Newsom is using his new podcast to try to rebrand as a centrist. I know you won't fall for this, but don't let anyone you know and love to fall for it either. In one exchange with Charlie Kirk, Newsom mentioned a certain book of the Bible that ridiculous people have "banned".
The family, we're about to hop on an airplane, go to our nation's capital, spend a couple days there, seeing the sights, going to the museums, all the rest. It'll be a lot of fun. If you have any suggestions on what we should do, we have no plans, other than, you know, we're just going to be in the mall. So we're just going to go here, there, yonder.
But if there's any place in that mall area that we have to go see, shoot me a note at slaterradio at gmail.com and try to throw it on the agenda. It's me and the wife and all four kids, two to six. So factor that into your suggestions. I want to talk a bit here about Gavin Newsom.
We did a lot on the show this morning, so I don't want to do too much here, although I don't know how much crossover there is. I'd be curious, I wish we could figure that out. How many people listen to this podcast, listen to SiriusXM, or my local show in San Diego.
I don't know how much crossover there is, I don't know how much I'm repeating a new audience or not. But very short, Gavin Newsom is running for president in 2028, he knows that he can't run on the far left like he's been governing and like Kamala Harris ran, so he's trying to make a new path for him
and the Democratic Party. In order to do that, and this is smart on his behalf here, right? He's a snake, very shrewd, you know, watch out for people like him. He's an absolute snake. He started this podcast called This is Gavin Newsom. And he's, he said he's only going to have MAGA Republicans on. And his first guest was Charlie Kirk. And Charlie Kirk did great, I didn't hear the whole thing yet. But what I've seen is Charlie Kirk did a wonderful job. But what Gavin is doing in these interviews is agreeing with these MAGA conservatives
so that he can come across as bucking his party and as a more moderate guy. That's the play. One of my jobs as someone who lived in California for 12 years under his reign is to make sure that everyone understands who he is and how he governed then. He has not changed. I'm all for change and I believe people can change,
and people can change their ideas and have different opinions on things. I've done that many times. But every time I do, I always have a pivot point. If you want to repent, then that's great, but what happened?
Why?
Tell me what happened, what'd you learn? When did you realize you were wrong and now you want to do what you think is right? Like, tell me what happened. Tell me the road to Damascus moment that occurred. And Newsom doesn't have that and he won't do that.
And if he does, then great, we can chat. But that's not what this is. This is a scheme. It's a trick. I would be, I would give some advice, some words of warning to any MAGA Republicans who to know that he's doing this to use you.
I'm not saying you shouldn't go on it,
and I don't know how I would navigate it,
but just know that the purpose of it is not to learn, not to understand, it's to use you to improve his image as a centrist. So do with that what you will. But what is the biblical, and we talked more about it on the show,
but that's enough politics. What is the biblical point to be made here today? This stood out to me. Oh, here's how you know Gavin's doing this. This clip I'm going to play here. In this exchange, I think it's pretty obvious
that Charlie Kirk got the upper hand here. I mean, if this is a debate and we're scoring points, I think Charlie won on points, no doubt. I don't even know if Gavin made any argument at all, actually, in this two-minute clip. So Charlie won, but you know how I found this clip? Gavin Newsom tweeted it out. In almost all the clips I see on the internet, Gavin Newsom's team put
together and then at the end of it put, like, hey, listen, this is Gavin Newsom. Why would he send this clip out? If anything, Gavin Newsom would delete this from the podcast. I'm sure no one ever saw it, but he didn't. He promoted it. So you would hear this and think that Gavin Newsom lost in here, in this exchange, but, but Gavin Newsom thought this was great. This is what he wants. It's like a prey or a rabbit. Yeah, they can go on. So here is, uh, here's this little two minute section.
How about the book ban stuff on a serious note, 4,240 books or titles,
libraries and schools are banned in 2023. Is that not as a conservative? Well, it depends. I mean, like, I think we can both agree pornography should not be taught to nine year old fair point. Okay, so that's a book. All right. Well, there were some other books. No, no, no, no, no. That was
a mom's for Liberty Bill O'Reilly's book. I don't know the story there. I'm just going to guess what happened. And I put money on this. People were banning my conservatives were saying, you can't put this porn in our kids school and then progressives came back and said oh we're banning books now fine I'm gonna ban Bill O'Reilly's book and that added to Gavin Newsom's list of 4,000 books that were banned I'm sure
that's what happened pretty contention timeout yeah like I agree in Bill O'Reilly the moms for Liberty movement that you made a big thing of was just no porn to 10 year olds yeah we agreed so those ban should be those books should be banned well okay so what we should do right now is every California school that has porn in their library should be kicked out. Does that include the Bible? Well I wouldn't say the Song of Solomon is porn. No, but I mean some have made that point. Is that a fair point? I don't
think that's fair at all. As a man of faith and I deeply admire that about you. He doesn't admire that about Charlie. No, I mean again the Song of Solomon is rather risque. No, it's very. But what we're talking about in these books is not just the words, it's also the images. And again, your audience can look at the images themselves. It's highly graphic. But again, what I...
It seems a banning binge.
I mean, at next level, sort of cancel culture. But why do you think moms are doing that? Do you think it's because they want to have mind control? Or do you think that they have come across incident of incident of highly provocative material? I love moms, but this moms, I mean, I've...
We don't have to get into Moms for Liberty.
It seems... You brought up the book band I mean deeply organized for a larger agenda but that's my humble opinion. But for example, let me just you know kind of complete the point is that it's easy to just call it kind of a book ban but when you actually have to read some of these books it will take your breath away of some of the stuff right you're like okay you know we're teaching a
tenor to put a condom on. I know I just have a problem with you know who the
hell is gonna decide that government I mean Doron DeSantis gonna say what I can read or say I mean that great the guy who shut down churches for years the guy who cut shut down there's a church in San Diego that has a preschool and That state went after this church and preschool for not forcing kids to wear masks and all this nonsense And shutting down churches John MacArthur's Church one of them among others This guy this guy's gonna come and do this whole like libertarian. Who's the government to say thing anything in the boardroom?
I'm on this is the exercise of politics, though. The exercise of politics is the highest form of community because it blends morality and sociability. So what we do is we have discussion and elections and we have boards and commissions, right? And we as a people say, okay, no porn for 10-year-olds.
Yeah. And that's politics, right?
Okay, so who got the upper hand in that? Back and forth, obviously. Charlie Kirk did, right? So why would Gavin Newsom tweet it out?
I think you know why.
Alright, so you got the biblical reference in there? Let's take it. Real quick, we don't need to do this now, but give a search for John MacArthur Gavin Newsom and it should pop up an open letter from John MacArthur Gavin Newsom. Because Gavin says, I deeply admire your faith. And I said, no, no, no, he does not.
Gavin Newsom's group put out a billboard all across the country in red states. And I'm looking at this billboard here, it says, Need an abortion? California's ready to help. Learn more at abortion.ca.gov.
And then underneath it, it says, Love your neighbor as yourself. There's no greater commandment than these. Mark 12 31. Put a little Bible scripture, a little verse in there, a Bible verse.
Throw some scripture in there to promote abortion. I believe that is what triggered John MacArthur to write this open letter to Gavin Newsom and it is worth your time to read that. But you're in there Gavin, try to I guess do this encounter of like oh is Song of Solomon porn? Use this as your encouragement to read Song of Solomon or Song of Songs. Song of Songs means it's the greatest of all the songs. It's love poetry. And I am super grateful that it
is in the Bible. It's about a man and a woman who have a desire for each other and they love each other. It would be a wonderful thing if everyone had a full understanding of this book of the Bible and had a full understanding of love as a gift from God. Now there's a lot here as well as a metaphor for Jesus and the church and there's a lot of Garden of Eden metaphor as well. But even if you just look at it on the surface, like this most basic understanding, it's a
collection of love poems and stories. If only young people today, you know, Gavin Newsom is like, oh, should that be banned from libraries like no Definitely not it should be in the library. It's like a major problem that it's not in libraries They're not in our hearts if only young people today and all people But young people had a biblical view of love and of physical desire. It's in there. It's in the Bible We'd be in a much better place
Hebrews 13 for it's not just in Song of Solomon Hebrews 13 forces marriage is to be held in honor among all and the marriage bed is to be undefiled for fornicators and adulterers. God will judge. In no way is this book inappropriate or too erotic, and I would argue that kids can handle love stories, especially one that is purely described in the Bible like this, but
kids should see love and what biblical love looks like give them that image give them that that clear standard song of Solomon is never crass do you want your kids are looking at today your kids do what kids are bombarded with today it's out of control the sexualization of kids is out of control it's one of the biggest problems in this country I would argue is the sexualization getting younger and younger.
But here you have a man and a woman, or let me just quote this, there's a man describing a woman with as beautiful of imagery as he could fathom. With choice fruits, henna and nard plants, nard and saffron, calamus and cinnamon,
with all the trees of frankincense, myrrh and aloes, along with all the finest spices, you are a garden spring, a well of fresh water. Oh no, compare that to like any rap song today or like, what are we talking about? That is, by the way, what the man was describing as a garden locked to suggest that what the American people are fed every single day has anything to do, any relation at all with how
the Bible presents love. It's absolutely asinine. There is no smut in the Bible, but it is all over us and the rest of our culture. It's actually a really good example of what we talked about yesterday.
I've heard this expression my whole life of we shouldn't teach kids what to think, we should teach them how to think. And it's amazing that the devil used that nice sounding line to really get a majority of adults to not teach their kids what to think. Isn't that something? Like really think about that.
Like of course you should teach your kids what to think. But then this expression came along, don't teach your kids what to think, teach them how to think. And we were all like, oh yeah, okay. I guess I won't teach them what to think anymore. And the devil's like, that was easy. One sentence, it doesn't even rhyme. This profound sentence I came up with, don't teach them what to think, teach them how to think. It doesn't even rhyme, but it still works. Unbelievable. Meanwhile, the Bible, Deuteronomy
6 says, you shall teach them diligently to your children, and shall talk of them when you sit in your house, when you walk by the way, when you lie down, when you rise. It means all the time. You shall bind them as a sign on your hand, and they shall be as frontlets between your eyes. It's like constantly we should be teaching the truth to our children. Instead, don't teach them what to think. Teach them how to think.
We're like, oh great. Meanwhile, you know what evil people did? They taught your kids what to think. If you don't teach your kids what to think about anything, including love and sex, then people who hate you will. So moral of the episode today, politically don't fall for what Gavin is selling for one second.
Please, I beg of you, don't fall for it. I know you won't, but don't let anyone else fall for it as he's running for president for 2028. And then also read Song of Songs. Read it. It's right there in the Bible. And let's all of us get a better connection with God's perspective on love. It's a beautiful gift. Mike Slater dot locals dot com transcript and commercial free on the website. Mike Slater dot locals dot com transcript and commercial free on the website. Mike Slater dot locals dot com.