MikeSlater
Politics • Spirituality/Belief • Culture
Charlie Kirk's Mentor, Dr. Frank Turek
Politics By Faith, November 13, 2025
November 13, 2025

15 years ago, before I was a Christian, my friend handed me a book by Dr. Frank Turek. I think about this book all the time. It turns out the author was Charlie Kirk's mentor and spoke at Berkeley the other day amidst the violence. Here is our interview with Dr. Turek on ontology, spistomology and theodicy.

Welcome to Politics by Faith. Thank you for being here with a special episode today. This morning on my Sirius XM radio show, Breitbart News Daily, had the honor of talking with a one Dr. Frank Turek, mentor of Charlie Kirk, standing right next to him when Charlie was assassinated on September 10th. And he spoke at Berkeley University the other day where there was all the riots and protests out front. Great honor to talk to this man who is very influential in my becoming a Christian. 

I had a militant atheist once at Michigan State ask me this question. He said, if there is a good God, why doesn't he stop all the evil in the world? And I said, sir, that is an excellent question. Maybe because if he did, he might start with you and me because we do evil every day. You ever notice we start complaining about evil. We always start complaining about somebody else doing it. 

It's like, hey, God, why don't you stop him? God, why don't you stop her? God, why don't you stop the shooter? God, why don't you stop Hitler? 

God, why don't you stop? 

Why do we never say, God, why don't you stop me? Ladies and gentlemen, if God were to stop evil at midnight tonight, would you still be alive at 1201? 

There you go. America is the greatest country in the world. Good morning. That is Dr. Frank Turek. He is the president of CrossExamined . org and the author of a book that my friend Paul gave to me right before I became a Christian. 

It's the most influential book, other than the Bible, of course. I didn't even know what apologetics was. The book's called I Don't Have Enough Faith to Be an Atheist, and I think about it all the time. It's the book I've given to the most people in my 15 years since it was first handed to me. You also happen to be Charlie Kirk's mentor. And that was a speech last night, or a couple nights ago, at Berkeley University. 

Dr. Turek, how are you, sir? 

Mike, I'm doing fine. But Antifa, want that event to go on, as you know. But God has a plan. More attention was brought to that event because of their crude, vile behavior. And that's one reason why we're having this conversation, I guess. 

Yeah, that's right. Did you feel the chaos? We saw it outside. 

Did you feel it? 

Oh, yeah. We were already inside before all that had begun. But it's amazing to me, the people who say they're fighting for inclusion, tolerance and diversity will not include you and will not tolerate you for holding a diverse view. I mean, if irony could kill, they'd be dead because they're doing exactly what they charge people on the right are doing. You know, I mean, they charge my friend Charlie Kirk with being a fascist because we all know, Mike, that a fascist tactic is to hand the microphone to your opponent and say, please make your case. I will listen. 

I mean, The people against Charlie Kirk are the fascists. The people that shot him or the guy that shot him is a fascist. It's crazy what the left does. They do exactly what they claim you're doing. You're not doing it. 

They are. 

Do these events feel different since Charlie was assassinated? 

Yes. This is the first event where we had mass protest. The other events, I guess I did four or five college events prior to this. They were all scheduled prior to Charlie. Tonight, I'll be at the University of Alabama, Lord willing. And then next Thursday, Boise State. 

But so far, other than this event, the college events have been mostly Christians and people sympathetic to TPUSA showing up. And it's been more cathartic than it has been adversarial. Although I will say everybody's been the room at Berkeley the other night was a supporter. The first guy claimed to be part of Antifa, and he asked Rob Schneider a question, and he was very disrespectful to Rob. And Rob got back to him with some sarcasm of his own, and then later shook his hand, because Rob was saying, You know, we're the peaceful ones in here. 

We're the ones that want to have a conversation. It's the people on your side who are outside of this venue right now, hurling bottles and and lighting off firecrackers and spitting on people. We want to have a conversation and you guys don't. Now, what's the way forward? Let's have a conversation. 

Yeah, that's great. What did you say when the Turning Point people said, hey, Frank, How about Berkeley? 

You want to go? 

Boise is one thing. 

Boise, great. 

Alabama, sure. You're going to go to Berkeley too. 

What was your first thought? 

Well, Charlie and I were talking about it months ago. I said, Charlie, if there's any campus I want to go with you to, it'd be Berkeley. He said, well, let's do it. So it was supposed to be me and Charlie the other night there. He's going to remain in glory, obviously, and did. 

So why did you want to go there? 

Oh, because it's the most liberal school in the country. I want to go into that. Those are the people I want to reach, you know, and the people around that area who are Christians, they need a lifeline. They need someone to come in and say, well, we're going to come into your area and speak, because typically you don't get that kind of speaker there. I mean, you remember, how long ago was this, Mike? Was it five or six years ago, six, seven years ago when Ben Shapiro went there? 

And they had to have 600 police officers protect him. Yeah. I mean, yeah. Yeah. Let's let's let's talk about how we're all. 

inclusive, tolerant, and diverse, but anybody that disagrees with us, we won't include and we won't tolerate. It's so hypocritical. Lightbulb you lit in my head, which was that people say there's no such thing as truth. Is that true? It's the same illogic right from the very jump for these people. 

What would you say your mission is? 

Are you there to encourage believers or convince the atheists more? 

Yes. How about both? My goal on a college campus is to encourage and equip the Christians and put a stone in the shoe of the skeptics. Look, you're not going to reach people like Antifa because they're totally closed off. And Jesus talked about this. He said, don't cast your pearls before swine because they will trample you to death. 

Now, you need to know who the swine are, who are the people that have their minds completely closed, may even have some sort of demonic activity going on. You're not going to reach them. Nobody's going to reach. They're not open. But there are people in the middle. And look, not everybody on the left agrees with Antifa. 

We can't be like the left and and paint everybody with a broad brush. If you have leftist political views, I hope you don't agree with Antifa on the method of achieving those views, right? 

But about a third of young people who are students think it's okay to use violence to oppose a political idea, whereas only about 3 % of very conservative students think that, and that's 3 % too many. But when you got a third of left -wing students saying violence is okay to advance or to oppose a political idea, we got a big problem here. 

Talking to Dr. Frank Turek, Charlie Kirk's mentor. How often do you think about September 10th? First thing I think about when I wake up is Charlie. Last thing I think about before I go to sleep is Charlie. I was there. It's going to take a while. 

It was just an awful stain on our country, an awful stain on our politics. But, on the other hand, Mike, it's also a demonstration that this world is fallen, that we're all fallen, that we all need a Savior, that evil is real, and if evil is real, that means good is real, because you can't have evil without good, and you can't have good without God. 

So this event actually shows God does exist, not that He doesn't, because it wouldn't even be evil unless God existed, and that's what I was talking about at Berkeley. You played that clip at the top of the show. 

Yeah. You weren't there. You were standing right next to him. Yeah, I mean, I was there because Charlie and I had spent the previous couple of days together, you know, talking about how to answer certain questions, particularly about the Christian faith, and even about Israel. People say, oh, he was waffling on Israel. No, he wasn't. 

I was in a meeting with him the day before he was murdered, talking about that, in fact, with three Israelis. So yeah, there's so much misinformation put out. And Candace Owens, unfortunately, is putting out a lot of it. She says she's asking questions, but she's insinuating that certain people are guilty when they're not. And that's just ethically wrong. I mean, my friend Mikey McCoy is getting death threats. 

I'm having people email me. 

You never know what can happen to you. 

You know, you ought to repent. Of what? You know, I mean, it's amazing. The ask questions. 

Didn't Charlie have a word for that? He had a phrase like the asking questions crowd or something like that. The just asking questions. It's okay to ask questions, it's not okay to insinuate people are guilty when you have no evidence. Okay? There's a difference between a possibility and evidence for a possibility. 

By the way, the same kind of thing happens when people talk about the resurrection. They'll say, oh, you know, somebody stole Jesus's body, or, you know, he swooned, or they went to the wrong tomb, and they come up with all these possibilities. All those things are possible, but you don't have any evidence for those. 

You need evidence to say, yeah, that's what we think happened. I mean, it's possible aliens took his body, Mike. 

But we don't have evidence for that. 

Yeah, but we do have evidence for a different thing. Of course, the truth. Yeah, he rose from the dead. Yeah. 

I asked earlier in the show, I asked if anyone has any questions for the email. And I got a couple of good ones here. This is from Dan. He said, what was Charlie like in the beginning stages of wanting to understand more and improve his wisdom or knowledge? Well, as I said at the memorial service, it can be hard to mentor somebody smarter than you. but not with Charlie Kirk because the only thing that exceeded his intellect was his humility. 

And the few things that I knew that he didn't, he wanted to know. So Charlie was the same always. He was always asking questions. He could learn from anybody because he knew he needed to learn from anybody. I mean, 31 years old, Mike. I mean, look at how accomplished he was at 31. 

Why was he accomplished at 31? Because he knew that he could learn from other people and he took the opportunity to do so. He wasn't a know -it -all. He was somebody that knew he didn't know everything, and wanted to learn so much so he could be a better ambassador for Christ. He wanted to do two things. 

He wanted to bring skeptics to Jesus, and he wanted to bring people on the left to the right, and also affirm people on the right to know that we ought to learn. conserve values, not just values, they're moral truths, they're not just my opinion, to conserve what we know is good, right, true, and beautiful. That's what conservatives are supposed to do, conserve what's right and beautiful. That's what we're supposed to do, and Charlie wanted to do that. Give me an example recently, or whatever, of the stone in the shoe. I love that idea. 

You just want to throw a little, just some little thing that sticks with someone. What has been a stone in the shoe lately that someone's come back to you with and been like, oh man, you got me, Dr. Turek. You got me. That was the stone and I couldn't let it go. Well, evil is a big stone in the shoe of unbelievers because they have no standard by which to even tell you what evil is. Because if there is no standard of good that we're obligated to obey, then evil itself doesn't really exist. 

It's just your opinion. It's just something you don't like. It's just a preference. But the only way there can be a standard that all humanity is obligated to obey is if there is a God whose nature is good and who has said that we needed to obey that nature, otherwise we were immoral or wrong or unjust. You see, in order to say something's unjust, you have to know what justice is. In order to know what – in order to say something's immoral, you have to know what morality is. 

In order to say someone's not right, you have to know what right is. But those things only exist in a theistic world. They don't exist in an atheistic world where we're all just moist robots dancing to our DNA, as Richard Dawkins put it. And so evil is a big stone in the shoe of non -believers. Evil doesn't disprove Christianity. Evil doesn't disprove God. 

In fact, Christianity is the answer to the problem of evil. There'd be no reason for Jesus to be evil. if evil didn't exist. That's why he came. So evil is a big stone in the shoe. What you mentioned earlier is a big stone in the shoe. 

When people say self -defeating things, you know, when they say there's no truth and you ask them, is that true? Or when they say you ought not judge and then you say to them, then why are you judging me for judging? You know, these are self -defeating statements. When they say there are no absolutes and you say, are you absolutely sure? When they say all truth is relative and you say, is that a relative truth? When they say you can't know anything and you say, then how can you know that? 

You see, there's so many illogical things uttered by people on the left that once you unveil the law of non -contradiction on them, they suddenly go – they get all befuddled, and you know what they wind up doing? They don't argue. They wind up emoting, and that's what Antifa does. They can't argue for their position. 

It's wrong. 

It's indefensible. 

So what do they do? They emote. That's all it is. It's just rage. Yeah. Dr. Frank Turek, crossexamine . 

org is the website. 

I want to talk about some of the curriculum that I've since been doing in a moment at the website. Crossexamine . 

org, buy his book, Don't Have Enough Faith to Be an Atheist. 

By the way, moist robots, are those your words or his words? 

Are those actual Dawkins words? 

Moist robots? Moist robots is my word. Okay, that's your assessment. Yeah. His phrase is dancing to our DNA. Okay. 

Yeah. So we're just like, Just like our chemicals in our brain and the DNA, either one of those are bleak. That's like a bleak worldview. That's so sad. But on the evil point, I'm channeling Bill Maher and people like Bill Maher. 

Two things he'll say. Let me get your first one. 

You say he's good. How can we know evil if we don't know good? 

and God is good? 

Okay. 

He's also corrupt and petty and vicious and cruel. 

What do you say to that? Yeah. I would ask by what standard? 

By what moral standard are you saying those things? My standard. I think it's bad to kill all this giant group of people, which God did. If there's no God, that's just your opinion. Okay. Why is that wrong? 

Because I say it's wrong. Can't I just say it's wrong? What's wrong with that? Yeah, it's just your subjective opinion. It's like saying, I like chocolate, vanilla, and you like, or I like chocolate ice cream and you like vanilla ice cream. Okay, it's just a preference. 

But he doesn't act like it's a preference. You see, he has to steal a standard from God in order to argue against him. That's another book I wrote called Stealing from God, like atheists need God to make their case, okay? You have to steal a standard to say God is immoral. 

Now it turns out when you read the Bible and you see God judging people for evil, that's really what's going on. 

And God has the right to take people out whenever He wants. Look, we don't have the right to do that, but if God wants certain people to be judged now and move from this life into the next life, that's up to Him. You know, if Christianity is true, people don't die, they just change location. They go from this life to the next life. That's up to God, not up to us. So, look, let me say something about Bill Maher. 

I've been on the show years ago, a few times. I think Bill Maher makes more sense than most pastors, many times. Say more. 

He will talk on these issues where pastors won't, like transgenderism. Maher's all over it. He's going, this is crazy. He said, when I was a kid, I wanted to be a pirate. 

Thank God nobody took me seriously and took me for eye removal and peg leg surgery. You know, I mean, Maher gets many things right, even though he's an atheist. He still has. the standard of good on his heart written there by God, as Paul says in Romans chapter 2, the Gentiles and I have the law of the world written on their hearts, so he gets many things right. He just has no way of justifying what right is unless God exists. What's the best atheist argument to that? 

The Sam Harris, what's the Sam Harris argument to what you just said? How do they steal man? Can you steal? Sam Harris's argument is, well, what's right is human flourishing. And we might agree with Sam. Right. 

But what he's confusing is a couple of things. First thing, he has no standard by which to say humans should flourish. He's smuggling in a moral law in order to say that. Right. Why human beings? Why not dolphins? 

Why not roaches? Why not? And which human beings? Why us and not the Nazis? You know, who should flourish? So he's smuggling a moral standard into a system And secondly, he's confusing two things that many atheists confuse. 

They might say something like, hey, Mike, I know right from wrong. I don't need your God. We're not talking about knowing right and wrong. That's epistemology. That's how you know something. 

We're talking about the standard of morality itself. 

Why does that exist? That's not epistemology. That's ontology. 

And they're confusing epistemology, how you know something, with ontology, the existence of the thing you know. You know, you can drive down the street and see the speed limit 70 miles an hour and deny there's a traffic authority, right? You can know the speed limit and still deny that there's a traffic authority, but there would be no speed limit to know unless there was a traffic authority. And that's the problem with atheists. They know right from wrong, but they deny the authority that establishes right and wrong, whose nature is right. and wrong, not wrong, but is right, is the standard of right, and any deviation from that would be what's wrong. 

Okay. 

All right. 

That's a brilliant job explaining that to me like I'm in 10th grade. Can you explain that too? Say everything you just said again, like I'm eight years old. 

Like you're eight years old. 

It might be wrong to punch your sister, okay, if mommy exists. 

But if mommy doesn't exist, it's just your sister's opinion against your opinion, right? In other words, there has to be an authority that establishes what good or right is. And so for you to say, or for someone to say it's wrong to punch your sister, there has to be a standard of good that says it's wrong to punch your sister. If it's just your opinion against your sister's opinion, that's just two opinions. It's a preference. Yes. 

Even if you ignore mommy, the example that we used in the, your homeschool curriculum for second to fifth graders that we did last night was literally, if your mom says clean your room and you ignore her, she still said it. Whether you, whether you pretended to, whether you, you still heard it. Like you can, you can pretend like you didn't, but you did and your room still needs to be cleaned. Yep. Yeah. You can, you can know something is wrong and not do it, obviously. 

But something wouldn't really be wrong unless there was a standard of right that you could define wrong by. Because you see, evil is not a thing in itself, it's a lack and a good thing. So evil is like cancer. If you take all the cancer out of a good body, you have a better body. What happens if you take all the body out of the cancer? You got nothing, doesn't exist. 

Or evil is like rust in a car. If you take all the rust out of a car, you have a better car, but if you take all the car out of the rust, you got a pinto. Now, you got something that doesn't exist, right? In other words, evil is a lack in a good thing. Evil is what we might call anti -creation. God creates good things. 

God created Charlie Kirk, and Tyler Robinson did evil by destroying the good thing that God had created. Now, Charlie Kirk still exists, but his body has been destroyed. He still exists, he's absent from the body present with the Lord, But the bad thing that was done was anti -creation. God creates good things and human beings degrade those good things, and that's what evil is. It's anti -creation. I got one more apologetist question. 

Bill Maher would ask this too. He calls all the stories comically stupid. Floating hands on walls, people turning into salt, all the animals on a boat. Come on, Frank. Talking donkeys. 

Yeah, well, the only reason he thinks that is because he's an anti -supernaturalist. 

He thinks that only natural things can occur, but what he's missing is that this whole natural world was created to begin with and is sustained right now. The natural laws that are governing the universe right now were put there by a lawgiver, and they're sustained by a lawgiver. And they're not even the greatest miracles in the Bible. The greatest miracle in the Bible is the first verse, in the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. If that verse is true, Mike, every other verse in the Bible is at least possible. And now even atheists are admitting the evidence for the first verse. 

They're admitting the universe had a beginning. Of course, they don't think it's God, but what else could it be? 

If space, time, and matter had a beginning out of nothing, whatever created the universe has to at least be spaceless, timeless, immaterial, powerful to create the universe out of nothing, personal in order to choose to create, and intelligent to have a mind to make a choice. 

So he's asked people, when you think about a spaceless, timeless, immaterial, powerful, personal, intelligent cause, who do you think of? God. That's what we call God, okay? So if Genesis 1 -1 is true, if even atheists are admitting the evidence for that verse, then every other verse in the Bible is at least possible. 

Of course it's crazy by natural laws, but we're not saying a natural law caused you know, a hand to write on the wall or Jesus to walk on water or rise from the dead. 

We're not we're not saying you need natural law to even recognize what a miracle is. You know, you wouldn't be able to recognize that hands don't normally write on walls, you know, without a without an arm. You know, you wouldn't normally recognize that a man walks on water unless natural laws existed. You know, you wouldn't recognize you couldn't determine what a miracle was or discover what a miracle was. unless you had these natural laws that did the same thing over and over again, because miracles are an exception to those things. 

Who made God? No one made God, because He is the unmade maker. You don't ask who created the uncreated creator. We just mentioned that God is timeless. If you're timeless, do you have a beginning? No. 

No, you don't have a beginning, you don't have a cause. He is the uncaused first cause. And there has to be an uncaused first cause, otherwise nothing would exist. So it's either the universe is something outside the universe, but all the evidence shows the universe had a beginning, therefore it must be something outside the universe that is the uncaused first cause. Dr. Frank Turk, let me again give the pitch for your book, one of your books, I Don't Have Enough Faith to Be an Atheist. 

There's a few more. But I also got to commend you and co -author on the curriculum. So since last time we talked, I immediately bought the second to fifth grade student workbook. And we've been going through it with the kids. We go through it sometimes in the morning or dinnertime or in bed and we just roll through it. It is phenomenal. 

It is so good. The kids are so tracking with it. Dr. Turk, it's like case study, perfect tracking. They'll read it and then they'll ask a question. And it's literally the next part of the thing. 

It's perfectly outlined. I cannot give it, it could not be better. the way it's written and how it's written and the flow of it and the building on top of it. It's just perfection. And every single person with a second to fifth grader, Johnny's Johnny's in kindergarten. He gets it. 

So you can go, you can go below kindergarten to fifth grade. I would say, get that one. I can't vouch for the sixth, eighth or high school. I'm sure it's just as good, but I can only give you the highest approval for everyone listening to get the, uh, at least the very first second to fifth grade, uh, curriculum. How did you guys develop? I think it's called. 

Yes, God, it's real. It's on our website. Cross examine .org. 

Just click on store. You'll find it. Yeah. 

Go get it. Everyone get, I'm not kidding. You got to get that. And then if you're an adult, Start with five copies of I Don't Have Enough Faith to Be an Atheist. 

Might as well get ten, because you'll read it and then you'll give out a bunch to everyone else. 

Dr. Turek, keep up the wonderful work. 

Are you slowing down? Are you going to stop at all? Getting tired? Getting old? Well, University of Alabama tonight, Boise State next week. We'll get a little break over Thanksgiving, but yeah, it's been tiring, but we got to move forward. 

Hearts are tender, Mike. That's what we're doing. Crossexamined . org, Dr. Frank Turek. Dr. Turek, thank you for your time today. Thank 

Thank you, Mike. Appreciate it, God bless. Crossexamined . org, and I don't have enough faith to be an atheist. I'm not exaggerating when I talk about the book. You buy 10 of them, just buy 10 of them, you'll hand them all out. 

And we've had a wonderful time. Truly, it's been a joy reading through his homeschool curriculum because the kids, I'm not, I'm not, whatever I said there is 100 % true. I'll be reading something and the kids will ask a question. And I'll do the best I can to answer it. And then it's the very next paragraph in the curriculum is explaining the question that they just asked. It's so logically and perfectly outlined. 

And the kids get it and they're excited about it. They're excited that they get it. It's really, really good. Crossexamine . org is the website. A lot of information there to click around on and get the resources you need to help you work. 

Mike Slater . locals . com for the transcript and no commercials.

 

community logo
Join the MikeSlater Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
0
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
Fox & Friends

We were on Fox & Friends talking about all of the train robberies in CA. It's so bad the train company says they may have to ride right THROUGH Los Angeles entirely and never slow down lol. What a joke this state it.

https://archive.org/details/FOXNEWSW_20220122_110000_FOX_and_Friends_Saturday/start/5640/end/5700

That link is a bit odd, I've attached a short video to get the gist.

In short, The rich get richer, the poor get the handouts and the middle class gets out of town.

This causes these progressive politicians to get even more entrenched.

We haven't hit rock bottom yet.

00:00:32
Boys to men, girls to women

How do you do it? Advice please!

Dean Abbott,
"Why contemporary relations between the sexes are so messed up. The problem starts with men because men lead, the masculine pursues and initiates, and problems always start at the level of leadership.

Most men aren't taught that a relationship with a woman means accepting responsibility. No one tells us that a woman represents not only pleasure, but obligation.
The fact that having a relationship with a woman means responsibility and obligation never enters many men's minds.

When these men enter into a relationship with a woman, they are overwhelmed by her needs, her feminine communication style, and her emotions.
Moreover, he unconsciously resents her for having needs at all since he has been conditioned to see her solely as a source of pleasure.
When her anger and disappointment over his irresponsibility gets intense enough, he splits in search of another woman.
He mistakenly believes the problem wasn't his attitude nor that it is a ...

00:07:55
Surly this will be kicked off twitter eventually
00:06:34
Morning Motivation, April 21, 2023

I found a way to easily transcribe the podcasts, so I will post them here first before they go out to iTunes and the rest.

Good morning. Welcome to The Morning Motivation, brought to you by Public Square and Patriot Gold Group. I'm grateful you're here. I was reading a sermon by the great Puritan preacher John Owen in the mid-1600s. I'm so fascinated by this time period, 1600s, early 1700s. We focus a lot on our founding fathers. I think that the Tea Party movement and just conservatism in general has focused a lot on the founding fathers, and that's amazing, but I'm very fascinated by our founding grandfathers or great-grandfathers, the people who created the culture that our founding fathers were raised in.

0:00:44
Isn't that a fascinating era? We got like 1776, like that's great, I love it, I want to know more, I don't know nearly enough. But what about the 1720s? What was going on there? Or the late 1600s? What was going on in America at that time? And you know, we've all heard of the Puritans, but you ...

Morning Motivation, April 21, 2023
Inflation and ANGER

I am angry and frustrated. With our Rulers. For getting us in this terrible economy. It doesn't have to be this way.

How could they never learn from past mistakes! This is ANCIENT history, stop printing money...yet, after COVID, we never printed more. Amazing.

Please leave a 5-star review on Itunes. We have a ton of momentum, this is about to break through! Thank you!

Also, I haven't done any lives anywhere becauase we're hosting a daily TV show "Road to Misterms" on thefirsttv.com, and it's taken all of my extra time. And my wife is giving birth any day now, so...it's been a lot around here. But after the midterms, time will free up.

Inflation and ANGER
Politics by Faith: Parkland and the Death Penalty

I've gone back and forth on the death penalty many times over the years. I've recently come down on the other side.

Should the Parkland murderer have gotten the death penalty or life in prison?

Please leave a review on iTunes! We need to get to 1k :-)
www.thefirsttv.com/mikeslater

Btw, we're getting the momentum we need, more downloads every day, THANK YOU!

Politics by Faith: Parkland and the Death Penalty
November 26, 2025

Baptized Brethren contest with each other AND against The Church, calling “Lord, Lord” (Mt 7:21-22, 25:11; Lk 6:46), in the Devil’s disunity, whilst the enemy has breached the Gates and is welcomed at and obliged at the most august Court. “Lord, Lord.”

Faith of our Fathers. Jer 6:16; Mal 3:6; Heb 13:7-9; Jam 1:17; Gal 1:6-12; Jude 3; 1 Pet 5:5

THE CODE OF CATHOLIC CHIVALRY

The knight receives as his law the knightly Code of Honor, which is the expression of his absolute fidelity to God:

I. The Knight battles for Christ and His Reign.
II. The Knight serves his Lady the Blessed Virgin Mary.
III. The Knight defends The Holy Church unto blood.
IV. The Knight maintains the Tradition of his Fathers.
V. The Knight fights for Justice, Christian Order and Peace.
VI. The Knight wages war without truce or mercy against the World and its Prince.
VII. The Knight honors and protects the poor, the weak and the needy.
VIII. The Knight despises money and the powers of this world.
IX. The Knight is humble, magnanimous ...

November 19, 2025

You were terse and dismissive in this morning's 7:25 Eastern time call with the Man with four step children applying for Naturalization from his Naturalized U.S. Wife of Philippine descent. You should be more considerate of history about America's relationship such as with the Philippine People, which is quite notable with intrinsic factors which should have favorable weight in consideration the Filipino propensity to immigrate and become American Citizens.

"The Resident Commissioner of the Philippines was a non-voting member of the U.S. House of Representatives from 1907 until the Philippines gained independence in 1946. This role was established under the Philippine Organic Act of 1902, allowing the Philippines to have representation in Congress, similar to current non-voting members from U.S. territories."

Don't be so apparently xenophobic and stop misrepresenting American (and Christian while you're at it) History in omission through culpable ignorance.

The Philippines, 1898–1946
...

post photo preview
November 11, 2025

Happy Veterans' Day.
Support our Troops. Before. During. After.

St. Martin, Bishop of Tours, Confessor, Soldier of the State, Soldier of Christ
November 11
https://www.bartleby.com/lit-hub/lives-of-the-saints/volume-xi-november/st-martin-bishop-of-tours-confessor

post photo preview
JD Vance and The Progressive Pagan Tone Police
Politics By Faith, June 19, 2026

Please subscribe to our youtube page!

I love when pagans criticize Christians for not being "Christian enough" or the right type of Christian that they would prefer. Obviously, don't listen to them, but what does the Bible say about the words we speak and the tone we should have?

Welcome to Politics by Faith. It's where we take the news of the day, we bring it to the Bible. The point of this is we need to walk away with some peace and perspective because there's new headlines every day and it's all very anxiety inducing, but Ecclesiastes says there's nothing new under the sun. So thanks for being here to get the true story. Story of the day, J . D. 

Vance making the rounds and doesn't like his tone. Got a mean tone. Got to watch that tone. The tone police are out. J . D. 

Vance is making the rounds because he's got a new book out. and he is also a great spokesperson for this administration. So where Trump can sometimes be maybe rough around the edges, Vance is smoother, more polished, if you will. I don't know if that's entirely true. I think Trump is pretty smooth and polished, too, in his own way. But maybe the biggest advantage that Trump, excuse me, that Vance has over Trump is he's not Trump. 

So as much as much TDS people have seething through their veins, pulsing constantly through their entire body and soul, they don't yet have the same hatred for J . D. Vance. They will, don't worry. But right now, there's no such thing as J . D . 

D . S. That's right. One day there will be. Aw, he's even worse than Trump because he actually believes what he's saying. That's what's gonna happen. 

But there's certain places where I would much rather have the president be. Like negotiating with Iran, for instance. Trump's great at these big press conferences. Obviously, he's the best at the rallies. But when it comes to one -on -one with adversaries, I choose Vance all day on that one. All day long, you put Vance in that battle. 

big press conferences, Trump with another world leader, you put Trump. Someone versus, you know, meet the press lady or whatever, you send JD on. No question. JD Vance did great with the Ladies in the View, for instance. We played the entire 25 minutes or so he was on on my radio show. My one critique, if I had to have, critique's not even quite right, a nitpick, is the women on The View, they would hit him with like 48 questions at one time, and he'd have to think in his brain, okay, I have 12 seconds to respond. 

How can I possibly combine all of these questions? How am I gonna be able to find a cohesive thread, coherent thread to your incoherent questions, and somehow come up with an answer that can best encompass everything that's been said here? with a 12 second response and a smile. So there's times when he would say, okay, um, let me say this. You can see his brain. I try to put the pieces together. 

That's my one critique. My goodness. He did as good as any human can do in that unenviable situation. But I want to pick out this moment from the New York times podcast. Russ Dothat as this guy's name or an unpronounced or sign. He's very upset that the administration is not nice enough with their tone. 

Here's what he said. We could have a longer argument about the economics, but I just want to let's let's stipulate that the Trump administration has in some way a kind of vision of rebuilding the working class that's connected to Christianity. Was that hard to say? Was that hard to say, Ross? I'm stipulate for the sake of argument. and the fact that you have not given us three hours to have this discussion, we're stipulating it. 

It also seems to me like the administration has distanced itself in different ways from some other sort of obvious expressions of Christian influence on politics, some of them more sort of liberal coded, some of them more conservative coded, right? Like, the administration has been more hostile than any prior Republican administration, to say nothing of Democrats, in the last 20 years to the way we do humanitarian aid. It has kept religious conservatives, pro -life organizations especially, at arm's length in a way that has led to a lot of criticism. And then, you know, let's be honest, the tone of the administration is not consistently a Christian tone. there is a tone of aggressive uncharity to people who aren't on board with the administration's policies. So I would describe those as three areas where the administration has felt functionally post -Christian to me. 

And I'm curious what you think. Well, so on the first point, well, sorry, the third point. You can work backward. So on the tone thing, This is it's it's very hard to rebut this because it's like fundamentally unfalsifiable because for every clip that you could show me of me or the president or some cabinet secretary saying something that in your view is unchristian i could show you another few clips of us doing something or saying something that is like very christian the nature of political communication in the era of mass media is that sometimes people are going to say jokes that are taken out of context sometimes people are going to say I'm not saying I make mistakes. I talk about this in the book a little. 

In my book, Communion, available where books are sold, I talk about the own mistakes that I've made as a Christian reader in America. There is an apology to childless cat ladies. We don't need to get sidetracked by that. Go on. But my point is, I'm not saying we're perfect because we're not. My point is that the tone argument is in some ways, I think, people see what they want to see. 

And I also think that tonal arguments are ways of, frankly, policing working class ways of communication and covering them in elite preferences. So let's talk about what's broken in this scenario here. So yes, the Bible, God, talks about the way we should speak. Proverbs 51, a soft answer. turns away wrath, but a harsh word stirs up anger. " President, we've talked about this before, his game theory approach to talking with people and negotiating, but just everything, he will always start positive. 

He'll start kind every time, always. He will always start with a soft answer and a soft response and a soft initiation, always. 1 Peter 3 .15 says, make a defense to anyone who asks you for a reason for the hope that is in you, yet do it with gentleness and respect. The fruits of the spirit. One of them is kindness. Another is gentleness. 

Also, we are told to speak boldly. Acts 4 .31 says, and when they had prayed, they were all filled with the Holy Spirit and continued to speak the word of God with boldness. " So what do we think boldness, what would boldness mean today? I bet based off of the New York Times editorial board, if they heard a preacher today speak with boldness, they might say, Oh, that tone makes me uncomfortable. That's not very inclusive sound. And we talked about this just the other day. 

The Bible says there is one way to get to heaven. Oh, that's. I don't like your tone. Paul speaks about boldly proclaiming the gospel. First Thessalonians 2 .2. But though we had already suffered, we had been shamefully treated at Philippi. 

As you know, we had boldness in our God to declare you the gospel of God in the midst of much conflict. How were they treated shamefully in Philippi? Or I should say, why? Is it because the people loved so much what they were saying and how they said it? No, that doesn't make any sense. They were treated shamefully, but what does that mean? 

Does that mean, uh, they, they, they preached the gospel boldly. And then people went on Twitter and said, I don't like your tone. No, they were stripped and beaten with rods, all without a trial, of course, then thrown into prison and placed in stocks while bleeding from the beating they just took. And they weren't treated this way because the people of Philippi liked what they were saying. And then all of a sudden, these are two different things. There's what's being said. 

And then there's how it's set. And. Progressive could make the argument, and it's not accurate, but they could make the argument that, oh, they don't mind what the administration's saying, they just don't like how it's set. No, that's you trying to get around. That's just a trick. They don't like what the administration is doing, and they're trying to tone police it as a way to seem like they're morally superior. 

So let's go over the four options though, right? I mean, there's four options. We can make like a chart of these four options. You have bad tone, mean words, good tone, nice words, bad tone, nice words, or good tone, mean words. So maybe this example work, we'll see how it goes. Bad tone, bad words. 

I hate you. Good tone, good word, nice word. Good tone, good, good, good. I love you. Well, let's mix it up. Bad tone, good words. 

I love you. I love you. That's almost like too passionate. How do you do it like hatred? I love you. Good tone, bad words. 

I hate you. The New York Times guy. thinks it's best that we say or do bad things, but in a nice way. That's like the Democrat way. Do bad things, but with a smile. Let's give a political example. 

Maybe this'll make more sense. So the Democrats, they were so nice when they opened up our borders to millions of illegal aliens, many of whom went on to murder and steal and destroy neighborhoods and take jobs and do terrible things. I just saw a story of, it was like 1 ,700 maybe illegal aliens who were arrested in I think like the Houston area. And they went through all their crimes, five murders, 170 burglaries, 78 sex offenses, like 50 against children, 40 domestic abuses, 500 DUIs. Just go down the list. But it was all done with a smile. 

It's so nice. And the poem on the statue says, it's great. The poor, tired, huddled masses. We were so kind when we did this. That's the binary. Bad things, but nicely. 

The Trump administration comes in and says, I actually think they'd said it quite nicely, but they say, you have to go. Oh, that's so mean. Your tone. But that's not even true what I'm saying here, because the real argument is it's the right people. And this is what J . D. 

brought up, right? J . D. after that, where the clip stopped, he said, let me just take a classic example. So the Biden administration had a very humane way of talking about immigration, about illegal immigration. It was very charitable. 

And some of the words that it offered to people who were coming into our country, I would say that it was not particularly charitable to the people who were living with the consequences of mass migration into our country. So at a certain level, what I think matters much more than perceived tone is actual conduct. " Well said, J .D. Vance. There was a similar moment on The View as well. So the questions from a bunch of them at the same time was, the first question from Whoopi was, what did black people do to this administration? that you treat them so terribly." And J . D. was like, what? 

And Whoopi said, she's like, what are you talking about? And they went around the table and they were all like, well, like erasing black history. And he's still like, what are you talking about? But it was all like a tone argument. They were all toned, like the ladies didn't like the tone of this administration or whatever. And J . 

D. says, all right, we've taken over the police department in D . C. , the law enforcement in D . as many murders. Last year, there were Last year, there were 42. 

This year, at the same time period, 20. And that's just murder. I mean, that's like all quality of life crimes are way down. People can go outside. Kids can walk to school. It's a safe city again. 

And it's a predominantly majority Black city. So these are Black people's lives that have improved. So you may not like that we removed a Black history overreach from the Black Lives Matter era. at the Smithsonian. We removed like a sign that was in the Smithsonian about Thomas Jefferson's slaves or something. Is that the most important thing or do you care about actual black lives in DC? 

So that's like, that's a, I think that's like a perfect example of content and tone. So the tone would be, Oh, you're erasing black history. Like, no, they're not. But like, even, but the content is, yeah, but we're saving black people's lives. Don't you care more about what's actually happening? All right, let me go to the Bible. 

So Jesus didn't always have a nice tone. We can't tell the tone really what Jesus was reading, right? But I can't imagine him having a great tone when in Matthew 23, Jesus says to the Pharisees, woe to you, hypocrites, for you shut the kingdom of heaven in people's faces, for you neither enter yourselves nor allow those who would enter to go in. I don't think he said that like politely or something. There's seven of those, by the way. Woes to you. 

Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites. For you are like whitewashed tombs, which outwardly appear beautiful, but within are full of dead people. bones and all uncleanliness. So you also outwardly appear righteous to others, but within you, you're full of hypocrisy and lawlessness. I don't think the people around were like, Oh, he's got such a nice tone. Listen to his tone. 

Wow. Or John 8 44, you are of your father, the devil, and your will is to do your father's desires. He was a murderer from the beginning. and does not stand in the truth because there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks out of his own character, for he is a liar and the father of lies. That's not very nice, Jesus. 

Revelation 2 .20, speaking about Jezebel. Behold, I will throw her onto a sickbed and those who commit adultery with her. I will throw into great tribulation unless they repent of her works. And I will strike her children dead. And all the churches will know that I am he who searched mind and heart. And I will give to each of you according to your works. 

Yikes. What is, what is Ross Dothat from the New York times? Think about that. Paul said in Galatians 1a, but even if we or an angel from heaven should preach to you a gospel contrary to the one we preach to you, let him be accursed. As we've said before. So now I say again, if anyone is preaching to you a gospel contrary to the one you receive, let him be accursed. 

The accursed in Greek is anathema. And the definition is devoted to the direst of woes. It's not very lovely sounding. Paul in Galatians 1a. Eric called the Galatians foolish. He calls people liar. 

He calls false preachers ungodly, wretched wanderers. Micah said that people hate good and love evil. That sounds judgmental. I think we need more of a strong tone from Christians. And I don't really care if Ross Dothat or whoever at the New York Times, they don't like it. We need strong tones when confronting hypocrisy, when guarding the truth, when protecting the church, when warning of judgment, and every time love requires it. 

True words and a strong tone is not bigoted. The truth demands nothing less. youtube . com slash at politics by faith. If you're listening to this on podcast, thank you. You can watch it as well on our YouTube channel, youtube . com. So if you could please subscribe, we've got youtube . com slash at politics by faith.

 

Read full Article
"One Of The Most Horrendous Failures In The History Of The Country"
Politics By Faith, June 17, 2026

The Rape Gang Inquiry report was released in England. It's more horrendous than anyone could imagine. They believe over 250,000 white British girls were trafficked in England. These crimes were committed by Muslim men, again, IN England. Every story they told of how this happened followed the same 3-step outline.

Welcome to Politics by Faith. This is where we take the news of the day and bring it to the Bible so we can walk away with peace and perspective. There's new headlines every day. What Ecclesiastes says is not the new under the sun. So thanks for being here to get the true story. And if you're listening to this on podcast, you can watch it on YouTube, youtube . 

com slash at politics by faith. Kids warning for the story of today, of the day to day. No kids allowed during this episode. If you do listen to the show with your kids, that means the world to me. I really want this to be a place that is wholesome and pure and something you can trust kids at least to be around. This episode is not that episode. So this is your official kids warning for today's episode. 

Give me a second to change the podcast away from this one. Story of the day today. Rape or gang rape inquiry report. Here's what happened. It's a British Congressman, essentially they're called member of parliament, Rupert Lowe. He's the lead of this effort. 

And they released a 219 page report outlining the horrors and scale of mostly Pakistani Muslims trafficking white British girls. The rape gang inquiry looked at the systemic targeting of overwhelmingly white British girls across the United Kingdom. The report says that the evidence put to the inquiry The evidence put to the inquiry confirms that this scandal constitutes one of the most horrendous failures in the history of the country. The scale of the crimes committed is staggering. Check this out. It has been previously established that at the very least, how many young girls do you think were trafficked inside of England? 

Like British girls trafficked within England? How many girls? What if I said 10 ,000? That'd be crazy. 250 ,000 young white girls have been subjected to repeated rape, gang rape, trafficking, torture, pregnancy, forced Islamic conversion, and obviously lifelong trauma. The report says the number, the actual number is probably higher. 

87 % of people convicted in these child sex exploitation cases had distinctively Muslim names. And those are just the ones convicted. Of the accused, it's 99 % Muslim. The report is tough to read. What's encouraging about it, if anything, is that this is the first time I've ever heard people not afraid to name the enemy. In this case, it's Muslim men, mostly Pakistani, but other cultural identities as well. 

All Muslim. The report says that the pattern was reinforced by eight theological and legal aspects of Islam. Talk about naming the enemy. These include the doctrine of Muslim superiority, drawn from Qur 'anic verses and the report goes through all the different verses of the Qur 'an. The gang members justification for their crimes can be found in the Islamic principles of loyalty and disavowal, the superiority of men over women, forced marriage combined with the absence of any fixed minimum age of consent, also the perception that a family sexuality is inherently dangerous. 

A system of sex slavery that authorizes sexual relations with non -Muslim captives. Also a religious sanctioned social hierarchy that subjugates conquered non -Muslims. Or in this case, British girls while in England. You take these Islamic aspects and you filter it through a clannish immigrant subculture The report says it provides religious justification that enabled the systemic rape and slaughter of white British girls. My goodness. So what's broken in this report? 

A lot, but I'll tell you what some, some initial thoughts I had after reading it. All of the stories they shared had the same outline as a three -step outline. First, the girls were the victims of abuse, neglect, and trauma at home. White British girls, abuse, neglect, and trauma at home. Second. Muslim gangs were ready to pounce. 

And three, the absolute failure of police, hospitals, all British institutions to do anything because they were scared that they would be called racist. It's the same outline, every story that they talk about. I'll give one example. Again, I encourage you to read the whole report. It's really tough, but it's really important to know what's happening. And it's important to know the full scale of this. 

I'm going to choose to go over just Chloe as the study here. It's not the worst story that they share. It's not the most brutal. It's the first one they share. So I'll just share Chloe just to get the outline out there. Chloe's parents divorced when she was young. 

She and her brother were in the custody of dad, which means her mom had major problems. Turns out she was homeless, but he was an alcoholic. Now she said life was generally secure with her dad, though, all things considered. But then dad died when she was 10. So then she went to go live with her mom and mom's new husband, who was also a pedophile, who, of course, abused her. Mom even caught the husband abusing her multiple times and did nothing, which might be the worst betrayal imaginable. 

One time this step dad or whatever was in the shower with her and mom walked in and then walked right out and she was 10 years old. This stepdad gave her alcohol and drugs to keep her quiet. She, of course, started running away, hanging out late at night with terrible people, unsupervised. So there's step one. And step two, that's where the Muslim men preyed on her and took her in, wooing her, treating her like an adult, whatever, all the grooming stuff. They filled that void that her own degenerate parents and people around her left. 

Her aunt and uncle were the only adults that she could confide in. And one time she went to them for help and her uncle raped her. So she's done. She's done. And she goes and she lives with all these Muslim men. She's 11 and she has passed around Pakistani men all through town and, and traffic through the taxi drivers in the city who were all Pakistani. 

So you see the two opening failures here. You have her parents and the adults around her, just total failure in every imaginable way. Then number two, there were the Pakistani Muslim men waiting to hunt her down. And then she had no help from the police or from the hospitals. And that's the third failure. The report says that around the age of 13, Chloe disclosed 

to social services that she was being sexually abused by gangs of Muslim men. In response, social services did not intervene, but rather talk to Chloe about contraception and sexual health. One social worker started regularly taking Chloe to a sexual health clinic where she was diagnosed with chlamydia in her throat, gonorrhea, genital warts, pelvic inflammatory disease, all the rest. At one point, a Pakistani man put a whiskey bottle up inside of her and then broke the bottle. And she went to the ER and the hospital did nothing to ask her, how did this happen? The hospital did nothing to ask her, how can we help you? 

How can we remove you from this obviously horrible situation you're in? They did nothing. When she was interviewed for this report, she was asked how many men abused her in this period of her life from the ages of 10 to 18. She said hundreds, hundreds and hundreds and hundreds. It's just one story. There's many, but again, the same outline every time. 

Broken home, then Pakistani Muslims. wading in the wings, and then the failure of the politically correct system to save any of these girls. I would argue that failure number one comes from a lack of Christianity and a lack of Christian culture. Of course, everyone sins and everyone makes mistakes, but the level of abandonment that these girls faced, then the taking advantage of that brokenness is where the Muslims came in and that's Islam. And again, they talked about eight parts of Islam in this report, naming the enemy. It's great. 

Muslim supremacy. Number two, an us versus them mindset. 3. Superiority and dominance of men over women. 4. The seclusion of women. 5. Forced marriage and no age of consent. 

Number six, female sexuality. Number seven, jihad and sex slavery. And number eight is an Islamic clan culture. And the report goes through each of those and quotes the Quran. We don't need to do it here, but again, I recommend that you read the full report just to know that we need to be reminded that this evil exists in the world. And it's not just in England or Pakistan. 

It's in our backyard in America as well. You just search for rape gang inquiry and it'll pop up. So let's bring the Bible in here. First, we're supposed to take care of widows and orphans. Instead, we become such a degenerate people that we make orphans, not just because parents die in a tragic accident, but because they're totally alcoholic, drugged up, whatever. We're making orphans. 

And then the state abandons them and the Muslims take them in as sex slaves in our own countries. Listen, when Job is talking about all the wicked things that God is allowing in this fallen world, he's venting. One of them, it's in verse, uh, sorry, chapter 24. Uh, and he just goes through this list of all these things like, God, like, how can you allow this? And in verse nine, he said, there are those who snatch the fatherless child from the breast and they take a pledge against the poor. What is that? 

This is back then when people who would take babies. So babies without fathers, but maybe the woman was in debt and they would take the baby as debt collateral as a young infant. And then do what with the baby? Who even knows? But the point is that Joe put this right in there, the list of extreme depravity. And Joe's upset that this goes on and goes unpunished. 

And it's going on today in the Western world too, if not worse. I'm recording this day on Pride Month. We're halfway through Pride Month. 1 Thessalonians 4 .3 says, it is God's will that you should be sanctified, that you should abstain from sexual immorality. There is so much sexual immorality. In phase one of this, where the parents fail, and then phase two, where the Muslim gangs take over, my goodness, it is the worst of sexual immorality, sexual depravity. 

Think, it's hard to say, right? But I think the worst would be pedophilia. Which leads me to Matthew 18 .6, if anyone causes one of these little ones, those who believe in me to stumble, it would be better for them to have a large millstone hung around their neck and be drowned in the depths of the sea. So if you think that sounds bad, if you think having a millstone tied around your neck and dropped overboard, if you think that sounds bad, you would prefer that than what you're gonna get. These people who are putting these young kids in a situation that is horrific, causing them to be in these places where sin is everywhere. Everyone involved in this failure, has put these children in these horrific situations, and a millstone should be placed around their necks, or they would prefer it than what's coming next in life or afterlife. 

They may get away with it here, but they won't in the end. A millstone, to be clear, was a giant stone with a rope through it, and the rope would be tied to a donkey, and the donkey would walk in a circle, and it would grind the grain. And these millstones would weigh hundreds of pounds. And apparently in Rome, they did this as a form of execution. They would tie this heavy rock like this and throw you overboard. And the Jews thought this was barbaric and awful. 

And here was Jesus. coming in saying, what's coming for you is even worse than that. In In a just society, we would do everything we could to stop this immediately. We'll see how the British people react. We'll see if political correctness, truly political correctness, we'll see if political correctness wins the day. And then we'll see if we decide to root this out in America as well. 

You want to talk about an 80 -20 issue in America that every political party, every political, everyone could get behind? You would think would be getting rid of this. But with so many oppressed peoples involved, Muslims, migrants, foreigners, I don't know if we will. Stay tuned on this one. YouTube . com slash at politics by faith. 

If you subscribe to our YouTube page, you're great. YouTube . com slash at politics by faith by the word.

Read full Article
Fight Night, Fighting Presidents and Fighting Prayer
Politics By Faith, June 15, 2026

The president hosted an incredible event in the White House. If you had the microphone for 30 seconds to talk to over 100 million people, what would you say?


Welcome to Politics by Faith. This is where we take the news of the day, we bring it to the Bible, so we can walk away with peace and perspective. There's new headlines every day and can all be very overwhelming, cause a lot of anxiety, but Ecclesiastes says there's nothing new under the sun. So thanks for being here to get the true story, story of the day, UFC fight night at the White House. Here's what happened. I didn't catch it live, but I've seen tons of clips of the pageantry of it all. 

Unbelievable. I, I, I've heard people use the word surreal to describe it. Just incredible. Let's just look at the production value alone. It wasn't just at the White House, which is what I was expecting. It was in the White House. 

It was totally immersive within the White House in every way. The main fight, the American guy, Gaethje, it started with him in the Oval Office looking at the Declaration of Independence up on the wall. And then he has this flag draped around his back and he walks out through the White House down the stairs into the Octagon. Oh, and then, by the way, beats the foreign undefeated champion for the America 250. The whole thing is ridiculous. And then he was asked at the end, he said, I mean, you were six to one odds. 

And he said, oh, man, the odds that our founding fathers faced were even worse and they still won. And here we are today in the greatest country in the world. What is happening is ridiculous. There was a scene of the opening national anthem sung by Zac Brown. He's in the octagon. Behind him is the Marine Corps marching band. 

Then the White House with the Blue Angels and the Thunderbirds flying over the White House all the same time. It looked AI, but it was very, very real. Just incredible optics. And I want to encourage the Freedom 250 people. Don't get me started on this. It's two different groups. 

America 250 was started 10 years ago by Congress. Biden appointed this woman, Rosie Rios, who is Mexican. She says, I'm Mexican more than American, and Mexicans in my blood, and California used to be part of Mexico. She's said all this stuff in Mexico before, so she doesn't love this country. She is sabotaging it. That's my unfounded claim, but look at the fruit. 

She is sabotaging the America 250. So when Trump won a year and a half ago, he came in, looked around and said, you guys got nothing planned, so he started a group called Freedom 250. has decided to lean on like UFC. They're doing the state fair coming up here where there's gonna be a big rodeo. They're doing the motocross. This is great. 

Big red state things that we are good at that the country loves. I haven't confirmed this, but I heard maybe 130 million people watched the UFC fight at the White House. 19 million watched the NBA finals. Like, what are we talking about here? Like lean into this stuff that works. You combine this incredible moment in the sports culture realm with the soccer win and just all the Europeans and people around the world in America loving America while they're here for the World Cup. 

Also a caller called in and a listener called in and told us about this golfer, this American golfer in Canada who's playing on this course. And I guess they have something called a rink hole where it's set up. They have like hockey boards, like the wall and a hockey rink. They have hockey boards all around it. So they call it the rink hole. So this American put on Someone in the audience had a Jack Hughes jersey. 

Jack Hughes was the American who got the game -winning goal in overtime to win the gold medal in the hockey game at the Olympics. So this golfer put on a Jack Hughes jersey in Canada, just want to remind you that, in Canada, and birdied the par 3. to resounding boos. As soon as he hit it, everyone started booing because it was a great shot, because he's in Canada. It's just been fun. Today's show was fun when we talked about all this stuff. 

It feels very golden era -y. A lot of fun, optics, fun moments in our life. There's a lot to say here about patriotism and the political winning that this is as well. Just a very quick point on that. The left, really since like the 60s, but certainly in the last six years, have really set themselves up as the people, the party, that don't like this country. We're defined by our sins. 

We have to apologize for them forever around the world and here at home. We have to teach our kids about how terrible we are. We were founded in 1690 because of slavery. America's evil and bad and awesome. And then Trump, you know, this last year, with so many amazing things that have happened, like going around the moon. We'll throw that in the mix too. 

There's been like really cool moments here. And because of the left's TDS, they've had to kind of be against it. There was an article in Salon about the World Cup. And the headline was something like, are Americans with as terrible as we've been? And are we allowed to be happy during the World Cup? Or are we allowed to root for America? 

It's like, what are you talking about? But they've humiliated, they've leaned so far into hating this country. And now that we are leaning so far into loving it, obscenely loving it, like to an extreme, that the left has humiliated themselves politically. And I think this is a great thing politically. Real quick, some people have said that having UFC is beneath the White House or something like that. Well, first of all, I mean, put it next to what Biden did to the White House with all the pride. 

stuff and the columns in front of the White House all in rainbow colors and topless transgender people. I mean, give me a break. So there's that. But I don't even think this is degrading the White House. Teddy Roosevelt had boxing matches in the White House. He boxed in them. 

He got punched in the face. He went partially blind in his left eye. He was boxing against some military aide of his who punched him right in the face. And then he decided, I don't know if I should be boxing anymore at the White House. It's not a great look for the president to have a black eye. Now, Teddy Roosevelt was kind of a different breed of man. 

That was a while ago, too. But even Lincoln, you know, they had the weigh -in at the Lincoln Memorial. And Lincoln, well, Lincoln's in the Wrestling Hall of Fame, not the WWE. like Greco -Roman wrestling hall of fame. He grew up in the frontier. Legend has it, he fought in 300 wrestling matches. 

And they called this rough and tumble wrestling, no holds barred, you do whatever, you gouge out eyes, hit below the belt, whatever. He was 6 '4", and Lincoln's huge. And the story is, and I'm sticking with it, that his record's 301. He lost one time to all Hank Thompson during the Blackhawk War in Illinois. He also was in a duel. Lincoln was the captain of his militia company and Lincoln was challenged to a duel. 

He was debating someone. I don't know what he said. I don't know if anyone knows what he said, but I don't know what he said. And the guy challenged him to a duel. And dueling, it was illegal in Illinois. So they had to go to this island in the Mississippi River. 

It's like a lawless island where people would go to have duels. So they met. And because Lincoln was challenged, he got to pick his weapon of choice. He chose the sword. So the men on the island, and I think the guy saw Lincoln enormous with a huge sword and he called a truce and he never spoke of it. The famous line is. 

a man asked him about it and asked if it was true that you were in a duel. And Lincoln said, I do not deny it, but if you desire my friendship, you will never mention it again. I share that because fighting at the White House isn't unprecedented and it's not bad to like fighting. in a sported context like this. And Trump, of course, has been a boxing fan with Atlantic City for many, many decades. All right, here's why I wanted to bring UFC up during our Politics by Faith episode here. 

My producer and I were talking, in my experience growing up, this is before I was a Christian, I would see these athletes thank God, like when they won the Super Bowl or something, and I would mock that and say like, oh, how ridiculous, like God cares about who won the Super Bowl. And if he helped you win the Super Bowl, what does that mean? God's not a Buffalo Bills fan or whatever. Like God hates the Bills and made them lose the Super Bowl. What about the players on the Bills who were praying to win at the Super Bowl? I just thought it was really silly to bring up God in scenarios like this. 

I feel differently now. I think you should bring up God all the time, win or lose. Philippians 4, 6 says, do not be anxious about anything, but in everything, By prayer and supplication, with Thanksgiving, let your requests be made known to God. But not if it's about a sporting event that you're participating in. No, like all of them. Let them all know. 

Let them all be made known to God. And if you don't get what you want, then no worries. It wasn't God's plan. That's why we played that clip of the Spencer Pratt from the Spencer Pratt campaign. It was one interview. I think it was in Fox. 

And he said, it's all God's plan. And if I win, then that's great. That's God's plan. If not, then that's great too. I get to go home and be with the kids more. I mean, Jesus says it quite explicitly. 

Mark 11, 24 says, therefore, I tell you, whatever you ask in prayer, believe that you received it and it will be yours. John 15, 7 says, if you abide in me and my words abide in you, ask whatever you wish and it will be done for you. Matthew 21, 22, whatever you ask in prayer, you will receive if you believe. Now, of course, God's not a genie. Doesn't mean like you wish for it and you get 10 wishes a year, 10 prayers a year that won't guaranteed come true. Like that's not how that works. 

But the Bible is very clear. You should make your requests known to God. Now, more than the outcome, it's about the process and it's about trusting him throughout whatever happens. Check out this fighter after one of the matches here. For everything, Donald White, Hunter, congratulations. It's a spectacular event. 

Thank you so much. I'm so happy. And I have a message. In John 3, verse 16, it says, For God so loved the world, that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish, but have eternal life. Jesus changed my life. Jesus saved my life. 

Jesus wants to save your life too. Give your life to Jesus. Thank you so much. In case we're not allowed to play that on YouTube, he said, John 3 .16. For God so loved the world, he gave his one and only son, so that you may not perish, but have eternal life. He said, God, or he said, Jesus has changed my life. 

He saved my life. You should make Jesus Lord of your life as well. So here's this man using his platform at this moment with 130 million people watching, whatever, to praise God and to worship God. That's awesome. And it's encouraging for people. I remember when I was just, I was like, 

the Bible. So I wasn't yet, uh, I wasn't yet baptized and I was driving down the street and, uh, this guy who I liked on the radio was on, he was mocking God and mocking religion. And I was still in this process of, of reading the Bible whenever. And I was like, yeah, maybe this is all pretty silly. This guy has a point. This is just kind of dumb. 

What if it is just all imaginary? Right. And send me down. Not a great place. And I think a lot of Chris, so they're vocal. The pagans are vocal. 

A lot of Christians are quiet, silent. Just kind of keep it to themselves. It's like, oh no, you should talk about it. Make it normal. Make it normal to talk about. Make it known. 

Because there's a lot of people who are studying the Bible right now or asking questions and thinking about it. And just you, just a little bit of encouragement here and there, a little bit like, oh, like this isn't weird, can do a lot of good. So get up there wherever, if you've got 130 million people watching you at a moment or one, get up there and worship God. We should be thanking God for the ability to do whatever we're doing. So it's not that you won the Superbowl. It's that you can play football or is that you can run or that you have a heart that beats. 

Anything good that happens is a blessing from God. A Christian at a UFC, and maybe he could give the same message if he lost. And that's a good test. If it's a good message, is what you're saying divorced from earthly outcome? Could you, could he have said the same thing if he won or lost? Yep. 

Let's go to the Bible, Matthew 7, 7, ask, and it will be given to you. Seek, and you will find. Knock, and it will be opened to you. For everyone who asks, receives. And the one who seeks, finds. And to the one who knocks, it will be opened. 

" Pretty amazing. Martin Lloyd -Jones, he said, I cannot imagine a better, more cheering or a more comforting state of mind. which to face all the uncertainties and hazards of our life in this world than the ones contained right here. There's nothing that could be more encouraging as we face life with all of its uncertainties and possibilities. Our future is unknown. In such a situation, this is the essence of the biblical message from beginning to end. 

This is the promise that comes to us. Ask and it will be given. Seek and you'll find. NACA will be open to you. In order that we might be quite certain about it, our Lord repeats it and puts it in an even stronger form. He says, for everyone that asks receives, and he that seeks finds, and to him that knocks, it shall be open. 

There's no doubt about it. It is certain. It is an absolute promise. What is more, it's a promise made by the Son of God Himself, speaking with all the fullness and authority of His Father. Again, God is not a genie. Thank God for that. 

He knows what's best for us. We can look back on life, especially things we wanted, things we prayed for that God didn't give us right away or at all. And we look back and we're like, Oh my goodness. Thank you God for not answering that prayer. Our job is to pray and whatever happens, worship him. Win, lose, high, low, young, old, happy, depressed, always be praising God because he's our father. 

He's our father in heaven. Quick preview. We're going to be doing a father's day TV special coming up in just a couple of days here. But what that means, what is a heavenly father? youtube . com slash at politics by faith. 

Thanks for listening to this wherever you're listening to it. You can watch as well on our YouTube page, youtube . com slash at politics by faith.

 

Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals