MikeSlater
Politics • Spirituality/Belief • Culture
What Happens When We Throw Away God: The Karmelo Anthony Murder Trial
Politics By Faith, September 8, 2026
June 07, 2026

We once had a God-fearing society. Then the pagans came in and threw God out of our culture, but thought they could keep all the good stuff. They were wrong. And one of those things that we lost was the ability to dispense justice through a jury system. Unfortunately, Pagan tribalism killed the jury system in America.

Welcome to Politics by Faith. It's where we take the news of the day, we bring it to the Bible so we can walk away with peace and perspective, live to fight another day in this fallen, broken world. There's new headlines every day, but Ecclesiastes says there's nothing new under the sun. Thanks for being here to get the true story. Thanks for subscribing to our YouTube page as well. If you're listening to this podcast form, you go to youtube . 

com slash at politics by faith and subscribe over there. The story of the day, the Carmelo Anthony trial. All right, we're about halfway through the trial right now. Here's what happened. Get caught up, get in front of things here. Here's the basics. 

Austin Metcalf. He was white. It's an important part of the story. He was 17 years old at a high school track meet in Frisco, Texas. Carmelo Anthony is black. He's from a different high school in that area. 

They were both at this track meet and there were thunderstorms, so the meet was delayed. For some reason, the black student, was in the white student's tent, the school tent area at this meet, right? And in the trial yesterday, two days ago, we found out from a witness that the black student, the black athlete was told to leave at least 15 times. Like, get out of here. This is not your school. Your school's tent is over there. 

We don't know why he was there. We don't know the motive behind why this interaction ever even took place at all in the first place. At one point, Carmelo Anthony said, touch me and see what happens. Metcalf then pushed him. Anthony then pulled out a knife and stabbed Metcalf in the chest, then ran away. Carmelo Anthony told police I was protecting myself. 

We also know he was quote crying hysterically when he was arrested. He told police he put his hands on me. I told him not to. And then he asked the officer if what he did could be considered self -defense. Carmelo is charged with murder as an adult. He was 17 when this happened. This was last year. 

This happened last, I want to say April. There is security camera footage of this. No one in the public has seen it yet. The jury has. They've now seen it. All right. 

Pun to do with this story. I want to talk about the most upfront, obvious surface level part of the whole thing. And that is the skin color of the people involved and of the jury and of the outrage that you're going to hear when the verdict is ultimately given. This is a woman who is outside the courtroom. in support of Carmelo Anthony. If evidence does come out that Carmelo was not in fact fighting for his life when he stabbed and killed Austin Metcalf, do you think that the black community will accept that? 

If evidence shows that he did not, no, we're going to stand by ours regardless. They stand by theirs. We're going to stand by ours regardless. I'm a mother first. I'm a black mother. Let me put that on there. 

I'm an African -American mother. So I have to put away my color first and step into the motherhood. Nobody wants to see their child slain. So I do want to send prayers to Officer Metcalf, their family. But at the end of the day, I got to think like, okay, what did you do to them or whatever to cause this to happen, the reaction? We got to start taking accountability for our kids. 

Because then again, if my kid, that's why it's a catch -22, if my kid was Carmelo and I feel like his back was up against the wall, I'm going to tell you something. up, better mine than yours. Better mine than yours. So either way it go, everybody loses. A black boy allegedly erred, and I say allegedly, heavy on the allegedly, allegedly erred at somebody. You see what I'm saying? 

So yeah, this is about race. Because if the shoe was on the other foot, they wouldn't give a damn. Who wouldn't give a damn? The, let me say this, let's say the community. So if Carmelo Anthony was the one stabbed and killed by Austin Metcalf. They wouldn't give a damn. 

George Floyd died of a fentanyl overdose and country. You can't have a jury system like this. There's been studies on this, plenty of analyses on this. There was a study that looked at trials with black and white defendants. So black and white defendants and then black and white people on the jury. and who voted guilty. 

So what they found in this analysis was if the juror is white, so a white juror, white defendant, the white juror says guilty 39 % of the time. If the defendant is black, so white juror, black defendant, the white person says guilty 32 % of the time. So about the same, but actually less. of but we'll call it the same, 39%, 32%. Okay. 

Then they looked at black jurors, black juror. If the defendant was white, the black juror found that white guy guilty 73 % of the time. If the defendant is also black, so black juror, black defendant, they only found that black defendant guilty 24 % of the time. That is a massive difference. So again, when it was a white juror, it didn't really matter if it was a white defendant or a black defendant, 39, 32, whatever, it was about the same. But if there was a black juror, massive difference. 

What did she say? We protect our own or something like that? That's tribalism. You can't have a jury system like that. You really can't have a jury system in a multi -ethnic society because the ethnicities become tribal. Now, in this particular trial with Carmel Anthony, Austin Metcalf is the person who was murdered, with Carmel Anthony, there are no black jurors at all. 

Because in the jury selection process, which might be the most important part of the entire trial, one prospective juror said, I don't, this is a quote, I don't know if I feel right putting a brother in jail, even if he murdered someone like that woman said, what if it came out that he wasn't acting in self -defense? Well, nah, I still wouldn't put it. And then like someone who was actually, that's just some crazy woman outside the trial, but even someone who was selected for jury was like, nah, I can't put a, I can't put a brother in jail unless he admitted it. So it doesn't matter what One of the OJ jurors admitted on camera that letting OJ off was payback for Rodney King. It did not matter one bit what was ever said in that trial. However long that trial lasted, trial of the century, it didn't matter at all what happened. 

It was already done. One of the jurors on the trial, as he walked out, threw the black power fist over at OJ, the whitest black guy ever, threw the black power fist at him. What? There was another major study done. This was done by the American National Election Studies, University of Chicago at Stanford. supported by the National Science Foundation. 

It's like maximum credibility in the study. This was done before and after the 2020 presidential election. So they asked a bunch of different questions, like 100 different questions. One of those set of questions was, they called it a feelings thermometer. So the question was, how would you rate different ethnicities based on zero to 100? So 50 to 100 means you have a favorable and warm regard towards this group. 

Zero to 50 means you don't have a favorable view towards this group, and you don't care much for that group. These are the words that they use. And they would ask you to rate, so let's say you're white. They'd say, all right, well, how do you feel about black people? How do you feel about Asian people? How do you feel about Hispanic people? 

And then if you're any of those other races, they would say, well, how do you feel about white people? So they asked white people first, right? And they said, well, then not first, but I'll do my analysis first. They said white people, right? So hey, white people, how do you feel about white people? Actually, they would ask white people how they feel about white people. 

So white people, how do you feel about white people? And white people are like, OK, I'm going to go around 70. And then, hey, how do you feel about black people? How do you feel about Hispanic people? How do you feel about Asian people? It was all around 70. 

How white people felt about white people? 75%. How white people felt about black people? 73%. That two point difference in America we call systemic racism. Two points. 

But they also asked Hispanic people. Hey, Hispanic people, how do you feel about Hispanic people? 85 % love Hispanic people. Hispanic people think Hispanic people are the bee's knees. Love, love Hispanic people. All right, Hispanic people, how do you feel about white people? 

65%. Pretty big spread. 20 points. Again, white people, two points. Two point spread between white and black. Two. 

And zero between white and Asian white and Hispanic. Zero. The same, same, same. White and black, two points. But Hispanic, between Hispanics and white, 20 points. Then they asked Asians. 

Hey Asians, how do you feel about Asians? 82%. Love. Asians, how do you feel about white people? 68. Pretty big spread. 

And then they asked black people. Hey black people, how do you feel about black people? 85%. Love black people. All right black people, how do you feel about white people? 60%. 

25 point difference. Biggest spread at all. All these other three groups of people had huge spreads between, if I may, my own kind and white people. For black and white, 25 points spread. Meanwhile, white people, a two point spread between black and white people. And we call that systemic racism. 

And we're lectured about it all the time. Back to the justice system. Hey, black juror, did this black 17 year old murder this white kid? No. Oh, well, here's security camera footage of it. Don't matter. 

Now, if Carmelo Anthony is found guilty, there will be mass outrage from the left. Black Lives Matter, the whole thing. And then the video will be released finally to the public a year later. And it won't matter. One iota. to any of those people. 

Truth doesn't. So as I'm recording this right now, the prosecution has rested their case. The defense picks it up next. The prosecution, the state, Metcalf's team, can then give a rebuttal. And then the defense gives a rebuttal to the rebuttal. And then it's up to the jury. 

And it's got to be unanimous. We'll keep you up to date. But let's go to the Bible now. I want to talk about justice. How does the Bible define justice? Justice is giving people what they are due. 

Now, when it comes to heaven and hell, you do not want what you are due because you are due hell. That's where Jesus comes in. Justice. There's a lot of different elements of justice. Let me just pick one for the sake of our time here. Justice is impartial. 

Deuteronomy 1 .17 says, you shall not show partiality in judgment. You shall hear the small and the great alike. You shall not fear man for the judgment is God's. Justice should be based, according to the Bible, based on the facts of the case. and the facts of the case alone. Now, partiality can go all sorts of ways, and you should go no way, only the way of the facts. 

The Bible says you can't judge against a person because they're poor or because they're rich, but you can't do it both ways, right? So someone may say, well, don't be mean against poor people. Well, you also can't go against rich people either just because they're rich, right? You can't judge a person guilty because they're black, but you also can't say they're innocent just because they're black. It had nothing to do with it. And you also can't judge someone guilty or innocent based off of a different case, like they did with OJ. 

Oh, what was the payback for Rodney King? The Bible speaks to this a lot, actually. Leviticus 19 .15, you must not pervert justice. We're going to get back to that word in a second. You must not show partiality to the poor or favoritism to the rich. You are to judge your neighbor fairly. 

Deuteronomy 10 .17, by the way, neighbor, your neighbor, not race. Your neighbor, Deuteronomy 10, 17, the Lord your God is God of gods and Lord of lords, the great, mighty, and awesome God. Let's get back to that in a second as well. Showing no partiality and accepting no bribe. If I could pick one story as if the biblical God talking is not enough here. 1 Samuel 8, 3, this sentence here, his sons, speaking of Samuel and his sons, however, did not walk in his ways, but turned aside after dishonest gain and took bribes and perverted justice. 

" There's the word again, perverted justice. The Bible a lot, Exodus 23 says, you shall not pervert the justice due to your needy brother in his dispute. Keep far from a false charge and do not kill the innocent or the righteous for I will not acquit the guilty. You shall not take a bribe for a bribe blinds the clear sided and subverts the cause of of the just. I want to get back to Samuel, Deuteronomy 16, 18 says, You shall appoint to yourself judges and officers in your towns, which the Lord your God has given you according to your tribes, and they shall judge the people with righteous judgment. You shall not distort justice. 

You shall not be partial, and you shall not take a bribe. There it is again, for a bribe blinds the eyes of the wise and perverts the words of the righteous. It's all throughout the Old Testament. So let's go back to Samuel. How terrible is it that Samuel's sons did not follow his way? They didn't follow dad's way. 

or their Heavenly Father. They turned aside. Turned aside is a verb that is translated 30 different ways in the Bible. Isn't that amazing? And it depends what noun you have next to it. So if you have the word tent next to this word, then it means to spread it, spread it out. 

If you have the word justice next to it, then it means to pervert it. Don't pervert justice. In the case I'm referring to, like what I'm talking about here, it's more denying it. Same thing, I guess, right? Now I'm not, well, I guess what's different is I'm also, I'm not saying the judge is taking bribes, but the jurors, They can't be motivated by anything other than the truth, whether it's taking a bribe, monetary bribe, or it's just deep seated racial resentment. The Bible has so many verses about taking bribes and just in general, lack of justice. 

It is clearly something that God hates. If we had, and this goes back to that scripture we shared of, you know, your God is the God of gods and the Lord of lords. If we had a jury of our peers, a system that we created full of Bible believing Christians, who were afraid of the wrath of God for perverting justice, when they are given the solemn responsibility of dispensing justice, of finding someone guilty or innocent, if we had a jury of peers who all agreed, all felt that same way, and all knew that God was watching, then a jury system can work, then a jury system is fair, and a jury system is good. But with the tribalism we have in America today, what's keeping people honest? Who cares? This is what happens when you throw God out of our culture. 

We lost so much more. Pagans thought they could throw God out and keep all the other good things that came from a God -fearing country. We had all this good stuff that happened from a God -fearing, biblical -minded country and culture. All these amazing things. We took it all for granted. The godless pagans came in, threw out God, and thought they could keep all the good stuff. 

And one of the good things they thought they could keep was a jury system. Who thought we were going to lose that? It's gone. Truth doesn't matter. You throw God out of our culture, you lose everything. I pray in this case, and all cases, for God -fearing justice. 

Please subscribe to our YouTube page. We're trying to grow there as much as we can, and one subscribe makes a big difference. It's free. Just click it. Hit the button. Subscribe. YouTube .

community logo
Join the MikeSlater Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
0
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
Fox & Friends

We were on Fox & Friends talking about all of the train robberies in CA. It's so bad the train company says they may have to ride right THROUGH Los Angeles entirely and never slow down lol. What a joke this state it.

https://archive.org/details/FOXNEWSW_20220122_110000_FOX_and_Friends_Saturday/start/5640/end/5700

That link is a bit odd, I've attached a short video to get the gist.

In short, The rich get richer, the poor get the handouts and the middle class gets out of town.

This causes these progressive politicians to get even more entrenched.

We haven't hit rock bottom yet.

00:00:32
Boys to men, girls to women

How do you do it? Advice please!

Dean Abbott,
"Why contemporary relations between the sexes are so messed up. The problem starts with men because men lead, the masculine pursues and initiates, and problems always start at the level of leadership.

Most men aren't taught that a relationship with a woman means accepting responsibility. No one tells us that a woman represents not only pleasure, but obligation.
The fact that having a relationship with a woman means responsibility and obligation never enters many men's minds.

When these men enter into a relationship with a woman, they are overwhelmed by her needs, her feminine communication style, and her emotions.
Moreover, he unconsciously resents her for having needs at all since he has been conditioned to see her solely as a source of pleasure.
When her anger and disappointment over his irresponsibility gets intense enough, he splits in search of another woman.
He mistakenly believes the problem wasn't his attitude nor that it is a ...

00:07:55
Surly this will be kicked off twitter eventually
00:06:34
Morning Motivation, April 21, 2023

I found a way to easily transcribe the podcasts, so I will post them here first before they go out to iTunes and the rest.

Good morning. Welcome to The Morning Motivation, brought to you by Public Square and Patriot Gold Group. I'm grateful you're here. I was reading a sermon by the great Puritan preacher John Owen in the mid-1600s. I'm so fascinated by this time period, 1600s, early 1700s. We focus a lot on our founding fathers. I think that the Tea Party movement and just conservatism in general has focused a lot on the founding fathers, and that's amazing, but I'm very fascinated by our founding grandfathers or great-grandfathers, the people who created the culture that our founding fathers were raised in.

0:00:44
Isn't that a fascinating era? We got like 1776, like that's great, I love it, I want to know more, I don't know nearly enough. But what about the 1720s? What was going on there? Or the late 1600s? What was going on in America at that time? And you know, we've all heard of the Puritans, but you ...

Morning Motivation, April 21, 2023
Inflation and ANGER

I am angry and frustrated. With our Rulers. For getting us in this terrible economy. It doesn't have to be this way.

How could they never learn from past mistakes! This is ANCIENT history, stop printing money...yet, after COVID, we never printed more. Amazing.

Please leave a 5-star review on Itunes. We have a ton of momentum, this is about to break through! Thank you!

Also, I haven't done any lives anywhere becauase we're hosting a daily TV show "Road to Misterms" on thefirsttv.com, and it's taken all of my extra time. And my wife is giving birth any day now, so...it's been a lot around here. But after the midterms, time will free up.

Inflation and ANGER
Politics by Faith: Parkland and the Death Penalty

I've gone back and forth on the death penalty many times over the years. I've recently come down on the other side.

Should the Parkland murderer have gotten the death penalty or life in prison?

Please leave a review on iTunes! We need to get to 1k :-)
www.thefirsttv.com/mikeslater

Btw, we're getting the momentum we need, more downloads every day, THANK YOU!

Politics by Faith: Parkland and the Death Penalty
November 26, 2025

Baptized Brethren contest with each other AND against The Church, calling “Lord, Lord” (Mt 7:21-22, 25:11; Lk 6:46), in the Devil’s disunity, whilst the enemy has breached the Gates and is welcomed at and obliged at the most august Court. “Lord, Lord.”

Faith of our Fathers. Jer 6:16; Mal 3:6; Heb 13:7-9; Jam 1:17; Gal 1:6-12; Jude 3; 1 Pet 5:5

THE CODE OF CATHOLIC CHIVALRY

The knight receives as his law the knightly Code of Honor, which is the expression of his absolute fidelity to God:

I. The Knight battles for Christ and His Reign.
II. The Knight serves his Lady the Blessed Virgin Mary.
III. The Knight defends The Holy Church unto blood.
IV. The Knight maintains the Tradition of his Fathers.
V. The Knight fights for Justice, Christian Order and Peace.
VI. The Knight wages war without truce or mercy against the World and its Prince.
VII. The Knight honors and protects the poor, the weak and the needy.
VIII. The Knight despises money and the powers of this world.
IX. The Knight is humble, magnanimous ...

November 19, 2025

You were terse and dismissive in this morning's 7:25 Eastern time call with the Man with four step children applying for Naturalization from his Naturalized U.S. Wife of Philippine descent. You should be more considerate of history about America's relationship such as with the Philippine People, which is quite notable with intrinsic factors which should have favorable weight in consideration the Filipino propensity to immigrate and become American Citizens.

"The Resident Commissioner of the Philippines was a non-voting member of the U.S. House of Representatives from 1907 until the Philippines gained independence in 1946. This role was established under the Philippine Organic Act of 1902, allowing the Philippines to have representation in Congress, similar to current non-voting members from U.S. territories."

Don't be so apparently xenophobic and stop misrepresenting American (and Christian while you're at it) History in omission through culpable ignorance.

The Philippines, 1898–1946
...

post photo preview
November 11, 2025

Happy Veterans' Day.
Support our Troops. Before. During. After.

St. Martin, Bishop of Tours, Confessor, Soldier of the State, Soldier of Christ
November 11
https://www.bartleby.com/lit-hub/lives-of-the-saints/volume-xi-november/st-martin-bishop-of-tours-confessor

post photo preview
JD Vance and The Progressive Pagan Tone Police
Politics By Faith, June 19, 2026

Please subscribe to our youtube page!

I love when pagans criticize Christians for not being "Christian enough" or the right type of Christian that they would prefer. Obviously, don't listen to them, but what does the Bible say about the words we speak and the tone we should have?

Welcome to Politics by Faith. It's where we take the news of the day, we bring it to the Bible. The point of this is we need to walk away with some peace and perspective because there's new headlines every day and it's all very anxiety inducing, but Ecclesiastes says there's nothing new under the sun. So thanks for being here to get the true story. Story of the day, J . D. 

Vance making the rounds and doesn't like his tone. Got a mean tone. Got to watch that tone. The tone police are out. J . D. 

Vance is making the rounds because he's got a new book out. and he is also a great spokesperson for this administration. So where Trump can sometimes be maybe rough around the edges, Vance is smoother, more polished, if you will. I don't know if that's entirely true. I think Trump is pretty smooth and polished, too, in his own way. But maybe the biggest advantage that Trump, excuse me, that Vance has over Trump is he's not Trump. 

So as much as much TDS people have seething through their veins, pulsing constantly through their entire body and soul, they don't yet have the same hatred for J . D. Vance. They will, don't worry. But right now, there's no such thing as J . D . 

D . S. That's right. One day there will be. Aw, he's even worse than Trump because he actually believes what he's saying. That's what's gonna happen. 

But there's certain places where I would much rather have the president be. Like negotiating with Iran, for instance. Trump's great at these big press conferences. Obviously, he's the best at the rallies. But when it comes to one -on -one with adversaries, I choose Vance all day on that one. All day long, you put Vance in that battle. 

big press conferences, Trump with another world leader, you put Trump. Someone versus, you know, meet the press lady or whatever, you send JD on. No question. JD Vance did great with the Ladies in the View, for instance. We played the entire 25 minutes or so he was on on my radio show. My one critique, if I had to have, critique's not even quite right, a nitpick, is the women on The View, they would hit him with like 48 questions at one time, and he'd have to think in his brain, okay, I have 12 seconds to respond. 

How can I possibly combine all of these questions? How am I gonna be able to find a cohesive thread, coherent thread to your incoherent questions, and somehow come up with an answer that can best encompass everything that's been said here? with a 12 second response and a smile. So there's times when he would say, okay, um, let me say this. You can see his brain. I try to put the pieces together. 

That's my one critique. My goodness. He did as good as any human can do in that unenviable situation. But I want to pick out this moment from the New York times podcast. Russ Dothat as this guy's name or an unpronounced or sign. He's very upset that the administration is not nice enough with their tone. 

Here's what he said. We could have a longer argument about the economics, but I just want to let's let's stipulate that the Trump administration has in some way a kind of vision of rebuilding the working class that's connected to Christianity. Was that hard to say? Was that hard to say, Ross? I'm stipulate for the sake of argument. and the fact that you have not given us three hours to have this discussion, we're stipulating it. 

It also seems to me like the administration has distanced itself in different ways from some other sort of obvious expressions of Christian influence on politics, some of them more sort of liberal coded, some of them more conservative coded, right? Like, the administration has been more hostile than any prior Republican administration, to say nothing of Democrats, in the last 20 years to the way we do humanitarian aid. It has kept religious conservatives, pro -life organizations especially, at arm's length in a way that has led to a lot of criticism. And then, you know, let's be honest, the tone of the administration is not consistently a Christian tone. there is a tone of aggressive uncharity to people who aren't on board with the administration's policies. So I would describe those as three areas where the administration has felt functionally post -Christian to me. 

And I'm curious what you think. Well, so on the first point, well, sorry, the third point. You can work backward. So on the tone thing, This is it's it's very hard to rebut this because it's like fundamentally unfalsifiable because for every clip that you could show me of me or the president or some cabinet secretary saying something that in your view is unchristian i could show you another few clips of us doing something or saying something that is like very christian the nature of political communication in the era of mass media is that sometimes people are going to say jokes that are taken out of context sometimes people are going to say I'm not saying I make mistakes. I talk about this in the book a little. 

In my book, Communion, available where books are sold, I talk about the own mistakes that I've made as a Christian reader in America. There is an apology to childless cat ladies. We don't need to get sidetracked by that. Go on. But my point is, I'm not saying we're perfect because we're not. My point is that the tone argument is in some ways, I think, people see what they want to see. 

And I also think that tonal arguments are ways of, frankly, policing working class ways of communication and covering them in elite preferences. So let's talk about what's broken in this scenario here. So yes, the Bible, God, talks about the way we should speak. Proverbs 51, a soft answer. turns away wrath, but a harsh word stirs up anger. " President, we've talked about this before, his game theory approach to talking with people and negotiating, but just everything, he will always start positive. 

He'll start kind every time, always. He will always start with a soft answer and a soft response and a soft initiation, always. 1 Peter 3 .15 says, make a defense to anyone who asks you for a reason for the hope that is in you, yet do it with gentleness and respect. The fruits of the spirit. One of them is kindness. Another is gentleness. 

Also, we are told to speak boldly. Acts 4 .31 says, and when they had prayed, they were all filled with the Holy Spirit and continued to speak the word of God with boldness. " So what do we think boldness, what would boldness mean today? I bet based off of the New York Times editorial board, if they heard a preacher today speak with boldness, they might say, Oh, that tone makes me uncomfortable. That's not very inclusive sound. And we talked about this just the other day. 

The Bible says there is one way to get to heaven. Oh, that's. I don't like your tone. Paul speaks about boldly proclaiming the gospel. First Thessalonians 2 .2. But though we had already suffered, we had been shamefully treated at Philippi. 

As you know, we had boldness in our God to declare you the gospel of God in the midst of much conflict. How were they treated shamefully in Philippi? Or I should say, why? Is it because the people loved so much what they were saying and how they said it? No, that doesn't make any sense. They were treated shamefully, but what does that mean? 

Does that mean, uh, they, they, they preached the gospel boldly. And then people went on Twitter and said, I don't like your tone. No, they were stripped and beaten with rods, all without a trial, of course, then thrown into prison and placed in stocks while bleeding from the beating they just took. And they weren't treated this way because the people of Philippi liked what they were saying. And then all of a sudden, these are two different things. There's what's being said. 

And then there's how it's set. And. Progressive could make the argument, and it's not accurate, but they could make the argument that, oh, they don't mind what the administration's saying, they just don't like how it's set. No, that's you trying to get around. That's just a trick. They don't like what the administration is doing, and they're trying to tone police it as a way to seem like they're morally superior. 

So let's go over the four options though, right? I mean, there's four options. We can make like a chart of these four options. You have bad tone, mean words, good tone, nice words, bad tone, nice words, or good tone, mean words. So maybe this example work, we'll see how it goes. Bad tone, bad words. 

I hate you. Good tone, good word, nice word. Good tone, good, good, good. I love you. Well, let's mix it up. Bad tone, good words. 

I love you. I love you. That's almost like too passionate. How do you do it like hatred? I love you. Good tone, bad words. 

I hate you. The New York Times guy. thinks it's best that we say or do bad things, but in a nice way. That's like the Democrat way. Do bad things, but with a smile. Let's give a political example. 

Maybe this'll make more sense. So the Democrats, they were so nice when they opened up our borders to millions of illegal aliens, many of whom went on to murder and steal and destroy neighborhoods and take jobs and do terrible things. I just saw a story of, it was like 1 ,700 maybe illegal aliens who were arrested in I think like the Houston area. And they went through all their crimes, five murders, 170 burglaries, 78 sex offenses, like 50 against children, 40 domestic abuses, 500 DUIs. Just go down the list. But it was all done with a smile. 

It's so nice. And the poem on the statue says, it's great. The poor, tired, huddled masses. We were so kind when we did this. That's the binary. Bad things, but nicely. 

The Trump administration comes in and says, I actually think they'd said it quite nicely, but they say, you have to go. Oh, that's so mean. Your tone. But that's not even true what I'm saying here, because the real argument is it's the right people. And this is what J . D. 

brought up, right? J . D. after that, where the clip stopped, he said, let me just take a classic example. So the Biden administration had a very humane way of talking about immigration, about illegal immigration. It was very charitable. 

And some of the words that it offered to people who were coming into our country, I would say that it was not particularly charitable to the people who were living with the consequences of mass migration into our country. So at a certain level, what I think matters much more than perceived tone is actual conduct. " Well said, J .D. Vance. There was a similar moment on The View as well. So the questions from a bunch of them at the same time was, the first question from Whoopi was, what did black people do to this administration? that you treat them so terribly." And J . D. was like, what? 

And Whoopi said, she's like, what are you talking about? And they went around the table and they were all like, well, like erasing black history. And he's still like, what are you talking about? But it was all like a tone argument. They were all toned, like the ladies didn't like the tone of this administration or whatever. And J . 

D. says, all right, we've taken over the police department in D . C. , the law enforcement in D . as many murders. Last year, there were Last year, there were 42. 

This year, at the same time period, 20. And that's just murder. I mean, that's like all quality of life crimes are way down. People can go outside. Kids can walk to school. It's a safe city again. 

And it's a predominantly majority Black city. So these are Black people's lives that have improved. So you may not like that we removed a Black history overreach from the Black Lives Matter era. at the Smithsonian. We removed like a sign that was in the Smithsonian about Thomas Jefferson's slaves or something. Is that the most important thing or do you care about actual black lives in DC? 

So that's like, that's a, I think that's like a perfect example of content and tone. So the tone would be, Oh, you're erasing black history. Like, no, they're not. But like, even, but the content is, yeah, but we're saving black people's lives. Don't you care more about what's actually happening? All right, let me go to the Bible. 

So Jesus didn't always have a nice tone. We can't tell the tone really what Jesus was reading, right? But I can't imagine him having a great tone when in Matthew 23, Jesus says to the Pharisees, woe to you, hypocrites, for you shut the kingdom of heaven in people's faces, for you neither enter yourselves nor allow those who would enter to go in. I don't think he said that like politely or something. There's seven of those, by the way. Woes to you. 

Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites. For you are like whitewashed tombs, which outwardly appear beautiful, but within are full of dead people. bones and all uncleanliness. So you also outwardly appear righteous to others, but within you, you're full of hypocrisy and lawlessness. I don't think the people around were like, Oh, he's got such a nice tone. Listen to his tone. 

Wow. Or John 8 44, you are of your father, the devil, and your will is to do your father's desires. He was a murderer from the beginning. and does not stand in the truth because there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks out of his own character, for he is a liar and the father of lies. That's not very nice, Jesus. 

Revelation 2 .20, speaking about Jezebel. Behold, I will throw her onto a sickbed and those who commit adultery with her. I will throw into great tribulation unless they repent of her works. And I will strike her children dead. And all the churches will know that I am he who searched mind and heart. And I will give to each of you according to your works. 

Yikes. What is, what is Ross Dothat from the New York times? Think about that. Paul said in Galatians 1a, but even if we or an angel from heaven should preach to you a gospel contrary to the one we preach to you, let him be accursed. As we've said before. So now I say again, if anyone is preaching to you a gospel contrary to the one you receive, let him be accursed. 

The accursed in Greek is anathema. And the definition is devoted to the direst of woes. It's not very lovely sounding. Paul in Galatians 1a. Eric called the Galatians foolish. He calls people liar. 

He calls false preachers ungodly, wretched wanderers. Micah said that people hate good and love evil. That sounds judgmental. I think we need more of a strong tone from Christians. And I don't really care if Ross Dothat or whoever at the New York Times, they don't like it. We need strong tones when confronting hypocrisy, when guarding the truth, when protecting the church, when warning of judgment, and every time love requires it. 

True words and a strong tone is not bigoted. The truth demands nothing less. youtube . com slash at politics by faith. If you're listening to this on podcast, thank you. You can watch it as well on our YouTube channel, youtube . com. So if you could please subscribe, we've got youtube . com slash at politics by faith.

 

Read full Article
"One Of The Most Horrendous Failures In The History Of The Country"
Politics By Faith, June 17, 2026

The Rape Gang Inquiry report was released in England. It's more horrendous than anyone could imagine. They believe over 250,000 white British girls were trafficked in England. These crimes were committed by Muslim men, again, IN England. Every story they told of how this happened followed the same 3-step outline.

Welcome to Politics by Faith. This is where we take the news of the day and bring it to the Bible so we can walk away with peace and perspective. There's new headlines every day. What Ecclesiastes says is not the new under the sun. So thanks for being here to get the true story. And if you're listening to this on podcast, you can watch it on YouTube, youtube . 

com slash at politics by faith. Kids warning for the story of today, of the day to day. No kids allowed during this episode. If you do listen to the show with your kids, that means the world to me. I really want this to be a place that is wholesome and pure and something you can trust kids at least to be around. This episode is not that episode. So this is your official kids warning for today's episode. 

Give me a second to change the podcast away from this one. Story of the day today. Rape or gang rape inquiry report. Here's what happened. It's a British Congressman, essentially they're called member of parliament, Rupert Lowe. He's the lead of this effort. 

And they released a 219 page report outlining the horrors and scale of mostly Pakistani Muslims trafficking white British girls. The rape gang inquiry looked at the systemic targeting of overwhelmingly white British girls across the United Kingdom. The report says that the evidence put to the inquiry The evidence put to the inquiry confirms that this scandal constitutes one of the most horrendous failures in the history of the country. The scale of the crimes committed is staggering. Check this out. It has been previously established that at the very least, how many young girls do you think were trafficked inside of England? 

Like British girls trafficked within England? How many girls? What if I said 10 ,000? That'd be crazy. 250 ,000 young white girls have been subjected to repeated rape, gang rape, trafficking, torture, pregnancy, forced Islamic conversion, and obviously lifelong trauma. The report says the number, the actual number is probably higher. 

87 % of people convicted in these child sex exploitation cases had distinctively Muslim names. And those are just the ones convicted. Of the accused, it's 99 % Muslim. The report is tough to read. What's encouraging about it, if anything, is that this is the first time I've ever heard people not afraid to name the enemy. In this case, it's Muslim men, mostly Pakistani, but other cultural identities as well. 

All Muslim. The report says that the pattern was reinforced by eight theological and legal aspects of Islam. Talk about naming the enemy. These include the doctrine of Muslim superiority, drawn from Qur 'anic verses and the report goes through all the different verses of the Qur 'an. The gang members justification for their crimes can be found in the Islamic principles of loyalty and disavowal, the superiority of men over women, forced marriage combined with the absence of any fixed minimum age of consent, also the perception that a family sexuality is inherently dangerous. 

A system of sex slavery that authorizes sexual relations with non -Muslim captives. Also a religious sanctioned social hierarchy that subjugates conquered non -Muslims. Or in this case, British girls while in England. You take these Islamic aspects and you filter it through a clannish immigrant subculture The report says it provides religious justification that enabled the systemic rape and slaughter of white British girls. My goodness. So what's broken in this report? 

A lot, but I'll tell you what some, some initial thoughts I had after reading it. All of the stories they shared had the same outline as a three -step outline. First, the girls were the victims of abuse, neglect, and trauma at home. White British girls, abuse, neglect, and trauma at home. Second. Muslim gangs were ready to pounce. 

And three, the absolute failure of police, hospitals, all British institutions to do anything because they were scared that they would be called racist. It's the same outline, every story that they talk about. I'll give one example. Again, I encourage you to read the whole report. It's really tough, but it's really important to know what's happening. And it's important to know the full scale of this. 

I'm going to choose to go over just Chloe as the study here. It's not the worst story that they share. It's not the most brutal. It's the first one they share. So I'll just share Chloe just to get the outline out there. Chloe's parents divorced when she was young. 

She and her brother were in the custody of dad, which means her mom had major problems. Turns out she was homeless, but he was an alcoholic. Now she said life was generally secure with her dad, though, all things considered. But then dad died when she was 10. So then she went to go live with her mom and mom's new husband, who was also a pedophile, who, of course, abused her. Mom even caught the husband abusing her multiple times and did nothing, which might be the worst betrayal imaginable. 

One time this step dad or whatever was in the shower with her and mom walked in and then walked right out and she was 10 years old. This stepdad gave her alcohol and drugs to keep her quiet. She, of course, started running away, hanging out late at night with terrible people, unsupervised. So there's step one. And step two, that's where the Muslim men preyed on her and took her in, wooing her, treating her like an adult, whatever, all the grooming stuff. They filled that void that her own degenerate parents and people around her left. 

Her aunt and uncle were the only adults that she could confide in. And one time she went to them for help and her uncle raped her. So she's done. She's done. And she goes and she lives with all these Muslim men. She's 11 and she has passed around Pakistani men all through town and, and traffic through the taxi drivers in the city who were all Pakistani. 

So you see the two opening failures here. You have her parents and the adults around her, just total failure in every imaginable way. Then number two, there were the Pakistani Muslim men waiting to hunt her down. And then she had no help from the police or from the hospitals. And that's the third failure. The report says that around the age of 13, Chloe disclosed 

to social services that she was being sexually abused by gangs of Muslim men. In response, social services did not intervene, but rather talk to Chloe about contraception and sexual health. One social worker started regularly taking Chloe to a sexual health clinic where she was diagnosed with chlamydia in her throat, gonorrhea, genital warts, pelvic inflammatory disease, all the rest. At one point, a Pakistani man put a whiskey bottle up inside of her and then broke the bottle. And she went to the ER and the hospital did nothing to ask her, how did this happen? The hospital did nothing to ask her, how can we help you? 

How can we remove you from this obviously horrible situation you're in? They did nothing. When she was interviewed for this report, she was asked how many men abused her in this period of her life from the ages of 10 to 18. She said hundreds, hundreds and hundreds and hundreds. It's just one story. There's many, but again, the same outline every time. 

Broken home, then Pakistani Muslims. wading in the wings, and then the failure of the politically correct system to save any of these girls. I would argue that failure number one comes from a lack of Christianity and a lack of Christian culture. Of course, everyone sins and everyone makes mistakes, but the level of abandonment that these girls faced, then the taking advantage of that brokenness is where the Muslims came in and that's Islam. And again, they talked about eight parts of Islam in this report, naming the enemy. It's great. 

Muslim supremacy. Number two, an us versus them mindset. 3. Superiority and dominance of men over women. 4. The seclusion of women. 5. Forced marriage and no age of consent. 

Number six, female sexuality. Number seven, jihad and sex slavery. And number eight is an Islamic clan culture. And the report goes through each of those and quotes the Quran. We don't need to do it here, but again, I recommend that you read the full report just to know that we need to be reminded that this evil exists in the world. And it's not just in England or Pakistan. 

It's in our backyard in America as well. You just search for rape gang inquiry and it'll pop up. So let's bring the Bible in here. First, we're supposed to take care of widows and orphans. Instead, we become such a degenerate people that we make orphans, not just because parents die in a tragic accident, but because they're totally alcoholic, drugged up, whatever. We're making orphans. 

And then the state abandons them and the Muslims take them in as sex slaves in our own countries. Listen, when Job is talking about all the wicked things that God is allowing in this fallen world, he's venting. One of them, it's in verse, uh, sorry, chapter 24. Uh, and he just goes through this list of all these things like, God, like, how can you allow this? And in verse nine, he said, there are those who snatch the fatherless child from the breast and they take a pledge against the poor. What is that? 

This is back then when people who would take babies. So babies without fathers, but maybe the woman was in debt and they would take the baby as debt collateral as a young infant. And then do what with the baby? Who even knows? But the point is that Joe put this right in there, the list of extreme depravity. And Joe's upset that this goes on and goes unpunished. 

And it's going on today in the Western world too, if not worse. I'm recording this day on Pride Month. We're halfway through Pride Month. 1 Thessalonians 4 .3 says, it is God's will that you should be sanctified, that you should abstain from sexual immorality. There is so much sexual immorality. In phase one of this, where the parents fail, and then phase two, where the Muslim gangs take over, my goodness, it is the worst of sexual immorality, sexual depravity. 

Think, it's hard to say, right? But I think the worst would be pedophilia. Which leads me to Matthew 18 .6, if anyone causes one of these little ones, those who believe in me to stumble, it would be better for them to have a large millstone hung around their neck and be drowned in the depths of the sea. So if you think that sounds bad, if you think having a millstone tied around your neck and dropped overboard, if you think that sounds bad, you would prefer that than what you're gonna get. These people who are putting these young kids in a situation that is horrific, causing them to be in these places where sin is everywhere. Everyone involved in this failure, has put these children in these horrific situations, and a millstone should be placed around their necks, or they would prefer it than what's coming next in life or afterlife. 

They may get away with it here, but they won't in the end. A millstone, to be clear, was a giant stone with a rope through it, and the rope would be tied to a donkey, and the donkey would walk in a circle, and it would grind the grain. And these millstones would weigh hundreds of pounds. And apparently in Rome, they did this as a form of execution. They would tie this heavy rock like this and throw you overboard. And the Jews thought this was barbaric and awful. 

And here was Jesus. coming in saying, what's coming for you is even worse than that. In In a just society, we would do everything we could to stop this immediately. We'll see how the British people react. We'll see if political correctness, truly political correctness, we'll see if political correctness wins the day. And then we'll see if we decide to root this out in America as well. 

You want to talk about an 80 -20 issue in America that every political party, every political, everyone could get behind? You would think would be getting rid of this. But with so many oppressed peoples involved, Muslims, migrants, foreigners, I don't know if we will. Stay tuned on this one. YouTube . com slash at politics by faith. 

If you subscribe to our YouTube page, you're great. YouTube . com slash at politics by faith by the word.

Read full Article
Fight Night, Fighting Presidents and Fighting Prayer
Politics By Faith, June 15, 2026

The president hosted an incredible event in the White House. If you had the microphone for 30 seconds to talk to over 100 million people, what would you say?


Welcome to Politics by Faith. This is where we take the news of the day, we bring it to the Bible, so we can walk away with peace and perspective. There's new headlines every day and can all be very overwhelming, cause a lot of anxiety, but Ecclesiastes says there's nothing new under the sun. So thanks for being here to get the true story, story of the day, UFC fight night at the White House. Here's what happened. I didn't catch it live, but I've seen tons of clips of the pageantry of it all. 

Unbelievable. I, I, I've heard people use the word surreal to describe it. Just incredible. Let's just look at the production value alone. It wasn't just at the White House, which is what I was expecting. It was in the White House. 

It was totally immersive within the White House in every way. The main fight, the American guy, Gaethje, it started with him in the Oval Office looking at the Declaration of Independence up on the wall. And then he has this flag draped around his back and he walks out through the White House down the stairs into the Octagon. Oh, and then, by the way, beats the foreign undefeated champion for the America 250. The whole thing is ridiculous. And then he was asked at the end, he said, I mean, you were six to one odds. 

And he said, oh, man, the odds that our founding fathers faced were even worse and they still won. And here we are today in the greatest country in the world. What is happening is ridiculous. There was a scene of the opening national anthem sung by Zac Brown. He's in the octagon. Behind him is the Marine Corps marching band. 

Then the White House with the Blue Angels and the Thunderbirds flying over the White House all the same time. It looked AI, but it was very, very real. Just incredible optics. And I want to encourage the Freedom 250 people. Don't get me started on this. It's two different groups. 

America 250 was started 10 years ago by Congress. Biden appointed this woman, Rosie Rios, who is Mexican. She says, I'm Mexican more than American, and Mexicans in my blood, and California used to be part of Mexico. She's said all this stuff in Mexico before, so she doesn't love this country. She is sabotaging it. That's my unfounded claim, but look at the fruit. 

She is sabotaging the America 250. So when Trump won a year and a half ago, he came in, looked around and said, you guys got nothing planned, so he started a group called Freedom 250. has decided to lean on like UFC. They're doing the state fair coming up here where there's gonna be a big rodeo. They're doing the motocross. This is great. 

Big red state things that we are good at that the country loves. I haven't confirmed this, but I heard maybe 130 million people watched the UFC fight at the White House. 19 million watched the NBA finals. Like, what are we talking about here? Like lean into this stuff that works. You combine this incredible moment in the sports culture realm with the soccer win and just all the Europeans and people around the world in America loving America while they're here for the World Cup. 

Also a caller called in and a listener called in and told us about this golfer, this American golfer in Canada who's playing on this course. And I guess they have something called a rink hole where it's set up. They have like hockey boards, like the wall and a hockey rink. They have hockey boards all around it. So they call it the rink hole. So this American put on Someone in the audience had a Jack Hughes jersey. 

Jack Hughes was the American who got the game -winning goal in overtime to win the gold medal in the hockey game at the Olympics. So this golfer put on a Jack Hughes jersey in Canada, just want to remind you that, in Canada, and birdied the par 3. to resounding boos. As soon as he hit it, everyone started booing because it was a great shot, because he's in Canada. It's just been fun. Today's show was fun when we talked about all this stuff. 

It feels very golden era -y. A lot of fun, optics, fun moments in our life. There's a lot to say here about patriotism and the political winning that this is as well. Just a very quick point on that. The left, really since like the 60s, but certainly in the last six years, have really set themselves up as the people, the party, that don't like this country. We're defined by our sins. 

We have to apologize for them forever around the world and here at home. We have to teach our kids about how terrible we are. We were founded in 1690 because of slavery. America's evil and bad and awesome. And then Trump, you know, this last year, with so many amazing things that have happened, like going around the moon. We'll throw that in the mix too. 

There's been like really cool moments here. And because of the left's TDS, they've had to kind of be against it. There was an article in Salon about the World Cup. And the headline was something like, are Americans with as terrible as we've been? And are we allowed to be happy during the World Cup? Or are we allowed to root for America? 

It's like, what are you talking about? But they've humiliated, they've leaned so far into hating this country. And now that we are leaning so far into loving it, obscenely loving it, like to an extreme, that the left has humiliated themselves politically. And I think this is a great thing politically. Real quick, some people have said that having UFC is beneath the White House or something like that. Well, first of all, I mean, put it next to what Biden did to the White House with all the pride. 

stuff and the columns in front of the White House all in rainbow colors and topless transgender people. I mean, give me a break. So there's that. But I don't even think this is degrading the White House. Teddy Roosevelt had boxing matches in the White House. He boxed in them. 

He got punched in the face. He went partially blind in his left eye. He was boxing against some military aide of his who punched him right in the face. And then he decided, I don't know if I should be boxing anymore at the White House. It's not a great look for the president to have a black eye. Now, Teddy Roosevelt was kind of a different breed of man. 

That was a while ago, too. But even Lincoln, you know, they had the weigh -in at the Lincoln Memorial. And Lincoln, well, Lincoln's in the Wrestling Hall of Fame, not the WWE. like Greco -Roman wrestling hall of fame. He grew up in the frontier. Legend has it, he fought in 300 wrestling matches. 

And they called this rough and tumble wrestling, no holds barred, you do whatever, you gouge out eyes, hit below the belt, whatever. He was 6 '4", and Lincoln's huge. And the story is, and I'm sticking with it, that his record's 301. He lost one time to all Hank Thompson during the Blackhawk War in Illinois. He also was in a duel. Lincoln was the captain of his militia company and Lincoln was challenged to a duel. 

He was debating someone. I don't know what he said. I don't know if anyone knows what he said, but I don't know what he said. And the guy challenged him to a duel. And dueling, it was illegal in Illinois. So they had to go to this island in the Mississippi River. 

It's like a lawless island where people would go to have duels. So they met. And because Lincoln was challenged, he got to pick his weapon of choice. He chose the sword. So the men on the island, and I think the guy saw Lincoln enormous with a huge sword and he called a truce and he never spoke of it. The famous line is. 

a man asked him about it and asked if it was true that you were in a duel. And Lincoln said, I do not deny it, but if you desire my friendship, you will never mention it again. I share that because fighting at the White House isn't unprecedented and it's not bad to like fighting. in a sported context like this. And Trump, of course, has been a boxing fan with Atlantic City for many, many decades. All right, here's why I wanted to bring UFC up during our Politics by Faith episode here. 

My producer and I were talking, in my experience growing up, this is before I was a Christian, I would see these athletes thank God, like when they won the Super Bowl or something, and I would mock that and say like, oh, how ridiculous, like God cares about who won the Super Bowl. And if he helped you win the Super Bowl, what does that mean? God's not a Buffalo Bills fan or whatever. Like God hates the Bills and made them lose the Super Bowl. What about the players on the Bills who were praying to win at the Super Bowl? I just thought it was really silly to bring up God in scenarios like this. 

I feel differently now. I think you should bring up God all the time, win or lose. Philippians 4, 6 says, do not be anxious about anything, but in everything, By prayer and supplication, with Thanksgiving, let your requests be made known to God. But not if it's about a sporting event that you're participating in. No, like all of them. Let them all know. 

Let them all be made known to God. And if you don't get what you want, then no worries. It wasn't God's plan. That's why we played that clip of the Spencer Pratt from the Spencer Pratt campaign. It was one interview. I think it was in Fox. 

And he said, it's all God's plan. And if I win, then that's great. That's God's plan. If not, then that's great too. I get to go home and be with the kids more. I mean, Jesus says it quite explicitly. 

Mark 11, 24 says, therefore, I tell you, whatever you ask in prayer, believe that you received it and it will be yours. John 15, 7 says, if you abide in me and my words abide in you, ask whatever you wish and it will be done for you. Matthew 21, 22, whatever you ask in prayer, you will receive if you believe. Now, of course, God's not a genie. Doesn't mean like you wish for it and you get 10 wishes a year, 10 prayers a year that won't guaranteed come true. Like that's not how that works. 

But the Bible is very clear. You should make your requests known to God. Now, more than the outcome, it's about the process and it's about trusting him throughout whatever happens. Check out this fighter after one of the matches here. For everything, Donald White, Hunter, congratulations. It's a spectacular event. 

Thank you so much. I'm so happy. And I have a message. In John 3, verse 16, it says, For God so loved the world, that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish, but have eternal life. Jesus changed my life. Jesus saved my life. 

Jesus wants to save your life too. Give your life to Jesus. Thank you so much. In case we're not allowed to play that on YouTube, he said, John 3 .16. For God so loved the world, he gave his one and only son, so that you may not perish, but have eternal life. He said, God, or he said, Jesus has changed my life. 

He saved my life. You should make Jesus Lord of your life as well. So here's this man using his platform at this moment with 130 million people watching, whatever, to praise God and to worship God. That's awesome. And it's encouraging for people. I remember when I was just, I was like, 

the Bible. So I wasn't yet, uh, I wasn't yet baptized and I was driving down the street and, uh, this guy who I liked on the radio was on, he was mocking God and mocking religion. And I was still in this process of, of reading the Bible whenever. And I was like, yeah, maybe this is all pretty silly. This guy has a point. This is just kind of dumb. 

What if it is just all imaginary? Right. And send me down. Not a great place. And I think a lot of Chris, so they're vocal. The pagans are vocal. 

A lot of Christians are quiet, silent. Just kind of keep it to themselves. It's like, oh no, you should talk about it. Make it normal. Make it normal to talk about. Make it known. 

Because there's a lot of people who are studying the Bible right now or asking questions and thinking about it. And just you, just a little bit of encouragement here and there, a little bit like, oh, like this isn't weird, can do a lot of good. So get up there wherever, if you've got 130 million people watching you at a moment or one, get up there and worship God. We should be thanking God for the ability to do whatever we're doing. So it's not that you won the Superbowl. It's that you can play football or is that you can run or that you have a heart that beats. 

Anything good that happens is a blessing from God. A Christian at a UFC, and maybe he could give the same message if he lost. And that's a good test. If it's a good message, is what you're saying divorced from earthly outcome? Could you, could he have said the same thing if he won or lost? Yep. 

Let's go to the Bible, Matthew 7, 7, ask, and it will be given to you. Seek, and you will find. Knock, and it will be opened to you. For everyone who asks, receives. And the one who seeks, finds. And to the one who knocks, it will be opened. 

" Pretty amazing. Martin Lloyd -Jones, he said, I cannot imagine a better, more cheering or a more comforting state of mind. which to face all the uncertainties and hazards of our life in this world than the ones contained right here. There's nothing that could be more encouraging as we face life with all of its uncertainties and possibilities. Our future is unknown. In such a situation, this is the essence of the biblical message from beginning to end. 

This is the promise that comes to us. Ask and it will be given. Seek and you'll find. NACA will be open to you. In order that we might be quite certain about it, our Lord repeats it and puts it in an even stronger form. He says, for everyone that asks receives, and he that seeks finds, and to him that knocks, it shall be open. 

There's no doubt about it. It is certain. It is an absolute promise. What is more, it's a promise made by the Son of God Himself, speaking with all the fullness and authority of His Father. Again, God is not a genie. Thank God for that. 

He knows what's best for us. We can look back on life, especially things we wanted, things we prayed for that God didn't give us right away or at all. And we look back and we're like, Oh my goodness. Thank you God for not answering that prayer. Our job is to pray and whatever happens, worship him. Win, lose, high, low, young, old, happy, depressed, always be praising God because he's our father. 

He's our father in heaven. Quick preview. We're going to be doing a father's day TV special coming up in just a couple of days here. But what that means, what is a heavenly father? youtube . com slash at politics by faith. 

Thanks for listening to this wherever you're listening to it. You can watch as well on our YouTube page, youtube . com slash at politics by faith.

 

Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals