We can no longer rely on our European allies for global security. It is also true that any reworking of global leadership has to start with renewed faithfulness to God. In this episode, we talk about Jason’s courage in Acts 17 and what it means to stand firm when you don't know who to rely on.
Welcome to Politics by Faith.
Thanks for being here.
Got an email from yesterday's episode that we did about how God's hand was clearly protecting our service members during the operation in Venezuela. There's no question about it. Steve wrote me a note, Steve in Ohio. He said, I was thinking not long after the success of the mission to Gran Maduro was promulgated, how many prayers for God to be with the troops at the beginning of this mission were offered up? I bet more than a couple. Knowing this administration, knowing the secretary of war like we do.
I'm certain that that was true. I want today to provide one more broad overview of what's going on right now and what time we're living in. And then I want to bring in a biblical story of Jason that I think can drive all this home. One point, the big overall point I want to make is that, and maybe you've said this in your life as well, if you want something done right, you got to do it yourself. So what we outlined over the last couple of days is that we live in a post -Cold War era. where we've been told by academia that all empires are bad.
All of human history has only been about empires, more empires than we can count, more empires than we've ever heard of. Some have totally been forgotten. There'll be empires just listed in the Bible. Just like one little mention of it. That's it. You never hear about it ever again, even though there was like an empire for hundreds of years that existed.
I'm reading one book and it mentions an empire that existed that we know nothing.
We don't know anything about.
We have no evidence of it existing other than several different mentions of it in ancient texts. And it's a real thing, a real place, we don't even know where it was or what it's about or anything, right? It's only been empire. But after the Cold War, academia said, empire's bad. The problem was we were the only empire, therefore America bad.
So from like 1970s or so on, empire's bad, therefore America bad. So from that point forward, our country went on a decades long intentional weakening of America. We gave authority over the UN, which is just a cabal of our enemies. We outsourced more and more of our manufacturing, more of our power. We imported more and more of the third world here, right? So we're going to make ourselves weaker by exporting what is good, or not exporting, outsourcing what is good.
And we're going to bring in more of what is bad, more things that make us weak. And we were told diversity is our strength, of course, in that process. Everything that was done was done to make us weaker in the last just like 50 years. That's never been the case. I think the Panama canals, I know it's in the news too, but it's the perfect analogy. Everything in our history that we ever did was done to make us a player on the world stage, and the Panama Canal is such a perfect example.
We built it, we finished it in 1914. The point of it, other than, of course, the geopolitical significance and economic significance, but the other point of it was to show the world what we're made of. The fact that the French who built the Suez Canal, which was easy, flat and straight, thought that they could come and build the Panama Canal here and failed, and then we had the gumption, the bravado to think that we could come in and get it done, and we did. It was crazy.
