MikeSlater
Politics • Spirituality/Belief • Culture
Separation of Church and State is a lie.
Politics by Faith, June 20, 2024
June 20, 2024

Don't let anyone get away with this misconception again. Thomas Jefferson did NOT mean that the church will have no influence in government. He meant that the government will have no control over the affairs of the church. We got it completely backward.


Welcome to Politics by Faith, brought to you by the Patriot Gold Group. Thanks for being here. So Louisiana just passed a law that says the Ten Commandments have to be posted in every single classroom in the state, including in colleges. And we'll have to just freak it out. So we did a segment on this on Breitbart News Daily.

I just want to present the whole segment to you here and please arm yourself with these facts and never let anyone, anyone ever get away with saying that separation of church and state was meant or intended to clear all Christian influence out of public life and even out of government life. That is so absurd and I'll hopefully fully and thoroughly debunk it right here. The very short of it. Separation of church and state. It was not meant to keep the church out of government. It was meant to keep the government out of church. Here's the full story about the separation

0:01:05
of church and state. I want to start off this hour with this though, Louisiana, first state country to mandate that the Ten Commandments be placed in every school classroom. Like it used to be. But I guess it was never mandated in the past. We just did it. Everyone just did it because we were a Christian nation.

0:01:33
Just as we were founded on. So here's what it says in Louisiana. A poster-sized display of the Ten Commandments in large easily readable font that's good you got to put the easy you know someone can like put it in Wingdings like there it is it's just in Wingdings easily readable comic sans in all public classrooms from kindergarten to state-funded universities this is

0:02:00
great so it's going to be sued into oblivion, of course. And the governor said, I can't wait to be sued. The posters, which will be paired with a four-paragraph context statement describing how the Ten Commandments were a prominent part of American public education for almost three centuries, must be placed in classrooms by the start of 2025. The posters can't be paid for with state funds.

0:02:23
So they're getting around one of the one of the arguments is gonna be made so I can only be paid for by donations so what what does each poster cost four dollars maybe like should be like 50 cents but knowing it's the government I'll chip in four bucks for for a poster the law also authorizes but does not require the display of other items in K through 12 schools including the Mayflower Compact, which was signed by the Pilgrims,

0:02:53
the Board of the Mayflower, often referred to as America's first constitution. That'd be fun to go over. We should talk about that one. The Declaration of Independence, Northwest Ordinance, which established a government in the Northwest Territory

0:03:03
in present-day Midwest, and created a pathway for admitting new states to the Union. So the court decided this issue back in 1980. And it was in Kentucky. The school was in Kentucky, it was a 5-4 decision that the Ten Commandments served no secular purpose and was only a religious resource and therefore

0:03:27
constituted a law respecting an establishment of religion. And it's high time we revisit that absurd decision, just like we've revisited many Supreme Court decisions over time. We're now at the 70th anniversary of Brown v. Board of Education so that's that's great so we can we can revisit Supreme Court decisions. They're not etched in stone. See what I did there? Zach that was a that was a Ten That's good.

0:03:59
I just want to make sure you caught it.

0:04:03
Are you not on our Raw Dog Comedy Channel? Take that, cut that, put that over on Raw Dog Comedy. Hey, you think this is funny? Check out Breitbart News Daily. Comedy like this. So listen, of course this is good.

0:04:27
If you, and of course this is nothing to freak out about, that's the other thing, if you walk into the House of Representatives, there are 23 marble reliefs of different figures all around the room of different people related to the development of law. And the first one, right over the door when you walk in, so you walk in, if you ever walk into the house of representatives chamber and look up look right behind you There's a relief of the main guy Moses

0:04:58
There he is that's the guy right there in the halls of Congress So obviously I'm for this and let me tell you why first about it's a first of all It's about high time that Christians go on the offense and stop being fooled into silence, stop being hoodwinked by this separation of church and state nonsense which everyone has backwards, I'll explain in just a minute. But Christians walked away from the public arena. We removed our religion and it was immediately replaced with many other pagan religions.

0:05:35
What do I mean pagan religions? I don't know exhibit a we're currently in the middle of pride month There's a pagan religion right there. You don't think that's a religion of course. It's a religion. We left they filled it in I'm against this law I'm against this law Because it doesn't also require the beatitudes be placed in every single classroom doesn't go nearly far enough. Ten Commandments, good start.

0:06:07
And don't come at me with this hypothetical, well, Slater, what if Buddhists want their dumb Buddha sayings on the wall? We don't live in a Buddhist nation. If the founders were Buddhist, then we could talk. If we were founded as a Buddhist nation, we'll have a

0:06:30
conversation. If we were living in Sri Lanka, then yes, I would expect a statue of a fat guy in every classroom. All right? But we don't. So that's a stupid hypothetical. What if the Buddhists? Now we got to let the Buddhists. No, you don't. Well, now you got to let the Satanists. No, you don't. You don't have to now do that.

0:06:50
Here's what the poster says. So hide your children.

0:06:52
Hide your children. I'm going to quote the Ten Commandments here.

0:06:54
Just so you know. Just so you know exactly what's in every... You know what we're talking about here, right?

0:06:57
You just hear...

0:06:58
So that the media, they don't tell you things.

0:07:00
They don't tell you the things. I've read all these articles and none of the articles have a link to what is actually put up on the wall. Right? They don't have any context. They don't have any story, they don't tell you the thing that you need to know. But hide your kids, I'm going to read the text. By the way, I saw a video of a mom, a cool mom, with maybe her, probably Johnny's,

0:07:30
probably four years old, old enough to know what he's doing, but young enough that they still think it's cute. And they were singing the Please Please Please song. Producer Zach, I know you're a big pop star. I got, who sings Please Please Please?

0:07:44
I'll have to look it up.

0:07:45
Sabrina Carpenter. There you go, Sabrina Carpenter. And that's like the big pop song right now. And the kids dropping F-bombs. And everyone thinks it's hilarious. So, that's great.

0:07:57
But come at someone with, come at that same person with the Ten Commandments and they're like whoa, whoa vulgar vulgar I got children in the car. All right The text shall read as follows the Ten Commandments I am the Lord thy God Thou shalt have no other gods before me thou shalt not make to thyself any graven images Thou shalt not take the name of the Lord thy God in vain

0:08:20
Remember the Sabbath day to keep it holy. Honor thy father and thy mother, that thy days may be long upon the land which the Lord thy God giveth thee. Thou shalt not kill, thou shalt not commit adultery, thou shalt not steal, thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbor, thou shalt not covet thy neighbor's house, thou shalt not covet thy neighbor's wife, nor his manservant, nor his maidservant, nor

0:08:48
his cattle, nor anything that is thy neighbors.

0:08:51
There you go.

0:08:52
It's got to be in every classroom in Louisiana. All right, I got, which by the way, that used to be in every classroom in America not that

0:08:58
long ago.

0:08:59
All right, I got two arguments. I was watching a debate the other day between Michael Knowles, who I like a lot, big fan of Michael Knowles, big Michael Knowles fan. I appreciate him very much. And there was a debate between him and this famous British atheist guy who I guess is becoming more and more popular. His name is Alex O'Connor.

0:09:23
I think. Yes, Alex O'Connor. Alright, so it's Michael Knowles and Alex O'Connor. And the question was, is America a Christian nation? Or was America founded as a Christian nation or something and this atheist guy brought up Thomas Jefferson and his separation of church and state and Michael Knowles who I love missed it totally missed it and I I don't make

0:09:52
this argument really much anymore because I think everyone's sick of hearing it but apparently we need to keep making it because I guess not everyone knows it. So I'm going to do it in full here. And I'm going to read it in full because we're adults. And it's serious exam and there's no commercials really. So we have plenty of time.

0:10:16
But I don't want to insult you. I think the media is insulting. Every time I read some article about how, oh you know, to make your reels more successful, they need to be quicker and faster. And it's like, particularly adult people can think, we can like read a thing and, no, no, cut to the chase. All right, so here's the back.

0:10:43
This is the story of separation of church and state. All right, everyone's got it backwards. Here's the story. There's a letter written by the Danbury, Connecticut Baptist Association. They were a religious sect that was persecuted by the Congregationalists at the time. They were the Puritans, basically. That were the majority in Connecticut. So Connecticut, the majority of people there

0:11:04
were Puritans. Yale was a Congregationalist seminary in 1701. So this is a Congregationalist state, Connecticut. But you got these Baptists who are there and the Baptists are like, hey, we were being persecuted here by our fellow Connecticutians. And so they wrote a letter, the Danbury Baptists wrote a letter to Thomas Jefferson, the new president, got this new president in here and these Baptists were worried that Thomas Jefferson, who's now in charge of the federal government was

0:11:42
going to impose religious laws and mandates on them or I should say laws and mandates on their religion they were worried that Thomas Jefferson was gonna come down and crack down on them well now we got it coming from all sides we got it coming from everyone here in Connecticut and now we're gonna get it in Washington as well. So they wrote a letter. They're very worried. They didn't want the state imposing on their religion. So here's the letter. I'll quote it in full. Dear sir,

0:12:13
among the many millions in America and Europe who rejoice in your election to office, that's a lot of a lot of this stuff in the beginning, but it's good. We embrace the first opportunity which we have enjoyed in our collective capacity since your inauguration to express our great satisfaction in your appointment to the Chief Magistrate of the United States. And though our mode of expression may be less courtly and pompous than what many others clothe their addresses with, we beg you, sir, to believe that none are more sincere.

0:12:45
Our sentiments are uniformly on the side of religious liberty, that religion is at all times the place and matter between God and individuals. That no man ought to suffer a name, person, or effects on account of his religious opinions. That the legitimate power of civil government extends no further than to punish the man who works ill to his neighbor. So we are... so by the way, they're not saying... the Danbury Baptists are not saying, there should be no religion. They're saying like, leave us alone.

0:13:17
We just want to be left alone. So we are sensible that the president of the United States is not a national legislator. And also sensible that the national government cannot destroy the laws of each state. We'll get to that in a minute.

0:13:30
But our hopes are strong that the sentiments of our beloved president, which have had such great, I have such genial effect already, like the radiant beams of the sun, will shine and prevail through all these states and all the world, till hierarchy and tyranny be destroyed from the earth. Sir, when we reflect on your past services and see a glow of philanthropy

0:13:51
and goodwill shining forth in the course of more than thirty years, we have reason to believe that America's God has raised you up to fill the chair of state out of that good which he bears to the millions which you preside over. May God strengthen you for the arduous task which providence and the voice of the people have called you to sustain and support you in your administration against all predetermined opposition of those who wish to rise in wealth and importance on the poverty and subjugation of the people.

0:14:18
And may the Lord preserve you safe from every evil and shall bring you at last to his heavenly kingdom through Jesus Christ our glorious mediator. Danbury Baptist. There you go. So they're saying, listen, don't impose any religious mandates on us, please. Don't make any laws mandating us. Religion should be between God and an individual. No, we don't want any national laws telling us what to do. Please don't get involved in the affairs of our religion. That's the letter.

0:14:52
And here's what Thomas Jefferson said. Gentlemen, the affectionate sentiments of esteem and approbation which you're so good as to express towards me on behalf of the Danbury Baptist Association gives me the highest satisfaction. My duties dictate a faithful and zealous pursuit of the interest of my constituents and in proportion as they are persuaded of my fidelity to those

0:15:16
duties, the discharge of them becomes more and more pleasing. Happy to be your President. Believing with you that religion is a matter which lies solely between man and his God, that he owes account to none other for his faith or his worship, that the legitimate powers of government reach actions only, and not opinions. I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared

0:15:42
that their legislature, the Congress, shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, thus building a wall of separation between church and state. Adhering to this expression of the supreme will of the nation, the Constitution, in behalf of the rights of conscience, I shall see with sincere satisfaction the progress of those sentiments which tend to restore to man all his natural rights.

0:16:11
Convinced he has no natural right in opposition to his social duties, I reciprocate your kind prayers for the protection and blessing of the common Father and Creator of man, and tender you for yourself and your religious association assurances of my high respect and esteem Thomas Jefferson. You with me? This is the Danbury Baptist saying, hey new president please don't impose on us any laws that interfere with our religion and this is Thomas Jefferson saying, hey Baptist in Connecticut don't worry about it. I will not get involved in the affairs of

0:16:44
your church in any way at all. You do your thing. There's a wall of separation between me and you. There's a wall of separation between me and you. There's a wall of separation between me, the federal government, and you, the individual and the organization. Don't worry about you being able to practice your religion. The Constitution says that the Congress shall make no law

0:17:03
creating a national religion for everyone to adhere to. Congress shall make no law establishing a religion. So don't worry about it. We're not going to tell you what you need to do in your church. You're free to practice however you wish. So don't worry about me. There's a wall separating the federal government from you. Got it? What was this exchange not? This exchange was not some atheist association saying,

0:17:39
Hey, Thomas Jefferson, make sure no Christians ever have anything to do with government at all in any way. And it was not Thomas Jefferson responding, You're right, we should have no religion in any government thing in any way whatsoever. That's not what it was. Separation of church and state means that, Excuse me, let me say it like this.

0:18:01
It has come to mean, people have misinterpreted, it has been spun backwards to mean, that the church should have nothing to do with the government. But Thomas Jefferson was promising that the state will have nothing to do with the affairs of the church. I'll say it again. 99% of people think that separates the church and state means that the church, that Christians,

0:18:27
Christians should have nothing to do with government. There should be no Christian displays in public spheres or, you know, no Ten Commandments in the classroom. That the church, that Christians should have nothing to do with government. But Thomas Jefferson was saying that to the church, don't worry, the government will have nothing to do with the affairs of you. You're free to do what you want to do how you want to do it

0:18:51
the congress shall make no law saying you can't you see the switcheroo it's an old switcheroo totally backwards and if thomas jefferson came back for ten seconds that would be my first question i'm like thomas jefferson what do you mean by separation of church and make it clear

0:19:09
he's like i already made it clear read the letter And if you need any more evidence than the actual text I just read, by the way, 99% of people think separation of church and state is in the Constitution or in the Declaration. It's not. It's that letter. It's just that one letter he wrote, which with the context couldn't be more clear.

0:19:33
But if you need any more evidence than what I just read, when the first, so the claim is that the government should have nothing to do with religion or that the religion should When the First Amendment was ratified, each colony or state at this point had their own official religion. So the issue wasn't that states shouldn't have their own official religion or that there shouldn't be an official religion. It was that the federal government can't come up with their own official religion and impose

0:20:09
that on all the states. Because the Anglicans in Virginia, that was the official religion in Virginia at the time, the Anglicans in Virginia didn't want the Puritans in Massachusetts to mandate that we're all Puritans now, sorry Anglicans we're a puritan country this is the official religion we're now the the congregationalist country and the Anglicans are like well hold on Virginia is an Anglican state you can't you

0:20:37
federal government that we all created you can't come in here and tell us what religion we have to do have to be see the difference there were already established churches official state religions in every state at the exact passing of our First Amendment. And notice there were no Hindu states. There were no Muslim states. So we can do this all day. I just picked a few of them. This is the Virginia Declaration of Rights, 1776, written by George Mason. All men are

0:21:09
equally entitled to the free exercise of religion according to the dictates of conscience, and that it is a mutual duty of all to practice Christian forbearance, love, and charity towards each other. So even in the Declaration of Rights, like, hey, you guys can do whatever you want, and obviously we're all going to be Christians. People are like, hey, you know, it's not all about you and you Christians. Look, they say you can do whatever you want to get they were all Christian we're no buddhists here

0:21:42
so virginia was an anglican state the official state religion like we are in angla it wasn't like oh just a majority of the more anglican none of the official state religion was we are anglican so was new york massachusetts is congregationalist this is chapter 6 article one of their state constitution any person chosen governor the ten governor senate representative and accepting the trust,

0:22:03
shall before he proceed to execute the duties of his or her office, of his place or office, make and subscribe the following declaration." All right, so here's what you gotta do. You want to be, you want to be governor of Massachusetts, here's what you gotta say. I, insert name here, do hereby, excuse me, do declare that I believe the Christian religion... That's in the Massachusetts Constitution from 1780.

0:22:28
So you have to vow. So hold on. If these same people who passed the First Amendment were supposed to believe that, oh, no religion in anything at all related to government, those exact same people passed the Massachusetts Constitution in 1780 and their oath of office was I, insert name here, do declare that I believe the Christian religion, those same people did both those things?

0:22:51
You with me? The same people who wrote the Massachusetts Constitution and also ratified the federal government first amendment? You think they meant, oh, we really meant no religion in government. Delaware had no official religion. Aha! No official religion. All right, well, Well, here's the Delaware State Constitution 1776, Article 22. Every person who shall be chosen a member of either house or appointed to any place or office of trust shall take the following oath.

0:23:20
You thought the Massachusetts one was tough. I, insert name here, do profess faith in God the Father and in Jesus Christ his only Son and in the Holy Ghost, one God, blessed forevermore. This is the state that had no official religion. This was your oath of office I profess faith in God the Father and Jesus Christ his only Son and in the Holy Ghost one God bless it forever more

0:23:44
and I do acknowledge the holy scriptures of the Old Testament and New Testament to be given by divine inspiration that's the opening oath of office if you want to hold any office any public office in Delaware in 1776 and beyond but that but that what they really meant was no religion in politics. That's what they really meant. What are you kidding me?

0:24:08
Like this debate, was America founded as a Christian nation? Like, okay. Like, what are you talking about? How could you possibly say no? All right, let me say this. Here are some opinions you can have.

0:24:24
Oh, wait, so you can't tell me what to think. Okay, here's some opinions that you can have. You can say, I wish we weren't founded as a Christian nation. I wish we weren't. Okay, you can have that opinion. You can have the opinion, it was bad that we were founded as a Christian nation. Okay? You can think that, you're wrong, but you can think that. I disagree, but you can think that. You can think it was bad. You can say, we shouldn't be a Christian nation today.

0:25:08
Okay? I'll debate that. But to have this debate, were we founded as a Christian nation? Yes, of course. What are you talking about? Now you can even say, it's irrelevant that we were founded as a Christian nation. But you can't really, because the justification that people are using to not hang the Ten Commandments

0:25:32
is the First Amendment. They'll say, oh, the First Amendment says you can't hang the Ten Commandments. Okay, let's talk about the guys who wrote the first amendment. Because look at all these other state constitutions they passed that require you to profess faith in our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ before you become lieutenant governor. Yeah, but they really wanted a separation. Connecticut

0:26:00
was a congregational state as you said New Hampshire's New Hampshire the student have New Hampshire Constitution 1784 Every individual has a natural and unalienable right to worship God according to the dictates of his own conscience and reason because you're free To do whatever you want Nevertheless no person shall be capable of being elected a senator who is not of the Protestant religion But they were really against they wanted a separation. The same people from New Hampshire who thought that we should have no religion in government

0:26:31
and you need to be a Protestant in order to be in the state senate. You see how ridiculous that is? For people to think that we weren't a Christian country. This is a good one, this is South Carolina. This is the state constitution that ratified 1778. There is one eternal God and a future state of rewards and punishment. God is publicly to be

0:26:52
worshipped. The Christian religion is the true religion. That the holy scriptures of the Old and New Testaments are divine inspiration and are the rule of faith and practice. And that it is lawful and the duty of every man being there unto called by those that govern to bear witness to that truth. Oh yeah, but we weren't we weren't a Christian nation. Even though it says in the South Carolina state constitution of 1778 that the Christian

0:27:19
religion is the one true religion and that God is to be publicly worshipped. But they didn't want any public worship. Look here's Thomas Jefferson. And the argument that I heard, and I don't want to put this guy on blast anymore, but the argument that I heard from this conservative, who I love, was, oh well that was just one guy. Or Thomas Jefferson wasn't the majority opinion.

0:27:42
Or we as a country didn't go that way. It's like, no, no, no. That's not what Thomas Jefferson meant. Theopsy meant exactly what all these other guys were saying. Let me do one more. Pennsylvania.

0:27:51
So people will often quote this last line. So this last line in this section of the Pennsylvania state constitution says, they were Quaker, of course, and no further or other religious test shall ever hereafter be required of any civil officer or magistrate in the state. So there's Pennsylvania saying no religious tests.

0:28:17
But they leave out the line before it. Section 10 Each representative, before they proceed to business, shall take the following oath. I do believe in one God, the Creator and Governor of the universe, the Rewarder of the good and Punisher of the wicked, and I do acknowledge the scriptures of the Old and New Testament to be given by divine inspiration." You have to make that oath and then no

0:28:42
further or other religious test shall ever be hereafter required. But except for that first one, that the Old and New Testaments are written by the Holy Spirit of divine inspiration. All right so that's enough. Knock it off with the are we a Christian nation or not. We were a million percent founded as one. Nothing could be more obvious. We of course have since lost our way and obviously we're under God's judgment now. There's plenty examples of that. Just go to your nearest college

0:29:16
campus and ask someone what a woman is. They won't even be able to tell you. There's a thousand other examples of how we've lost our way. You can think this is all bad. I wish this weren't the case. We shouldn't be like this anymore. Okay. You can think of those things. But this ridiculous, are we a Christian nation? Of nation. Of course we were and I would argue that the only way back to being a thriving country again is with a revival. Our founding fathers came out of the

0:29:47
Great Awakening, the first Great Awakening in this country. The second Great Awakening led to the end of slavery. We need a third and pronto. So is putting the Ten Commandments in every classroom against the Constitution? No, of course not. Is putting the Ten Commandments in every classroom going to fix all of our problems? No. Pretty good start.

0:30:17
We played the clip of Rosie O'Donnell earlier, talking about her transgender ten-year-old, who told her, said, Mommy, gender is infinite. And Rosie O'Donnell's like, where'd you learn that? And the 10 year old said, I just know it. Where do you think she learned it? She learned it in school.

0:30:34
So pick your religion.

0:30:35
You may wanna do this like,

0:30:37
namsy-pamsy, middle of the road,

like, oh, you know, I'm Christian or whatever, but maybe I don't want religion in the classroom. All right, pick one. There is one. There are religions in the classroom. So pick your religion. Do you want the trans gay pride flag in every classroom? Or do you want the Ten Commandments? Pick one. Which way, Western man? Pick one. Because we took the Ten Commandments


and it wasn't replaced with nothing if we're not a Christian nation what are we don't say nothing gotta be something you better pick one you don't pay his will you don't pay his will payments

 

community logo
Join the MikeSlater Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
0
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
Fox & Friends

We were on Fox & Friends talking about all of the train robberies in CA. It's so bad the train company says they may have to ride right THROUGH Los Angeles entirely and never slow down lol. What a joke this state it.

https://archive.org/details/FOXNEWSW_20220122_110000_FOX_and_Friends_Saturday/start/5640/end/5700

That link is a bit odd, I've attached a short video to get the gist.

In short, The rich get richer, the poor get the handouts and the middle class gets out of town.

This causes these progressive politicians to get even more entrenched.

We haven't hit rock bottom yet.

00:00:32
Boys to men, girls to women

How do you do it? Advice please!

Dean Abbott,
"Why contemporary relations between the sexes are so messed up. The problem starts with men because men lead, the masculine pursues and initiates, and problems always start at the level of leadership.

Most men aren't taught that a relationship with a woman means accepting responsibility. No one tells us that a woman represents not only pleasure, but obligation.
The fact that having a relationship with a woman means responsibility and obligation never enters many men's minds.

When these men enter into a relationship with a woman, they are overwhelmed by her needs, her feminine communication style, and her emotions.
Moreover, he unconsciously resents her for having needs at all since he has been conditioned to see her solely as a source of pleasure.
When her anger and disappointment over his irresponsibility gets intense enough, he splits in search of another woman.
He mistakenly believes the problem wasn't his attitude nor that it is a ...

00:07:55
Surly this will be kicked off twitter eventually
00:06:34
Morning Motivation, April 21, 2023

I found a way to easily transcribe the podcasts, so I will post them here first before they go out to iTunes and the rest.

Good morning. Welcome to The Morning Motivation, brought to you by Public Square and Patriot Gold Group. I'm grateful you're here. I was reading a sermon by the great Puritan preacher John Owen in the mid-1600s. I'm so fascinated by this time period, 1600s, early 1700s. We focus a lot on our founding fathers. I think that the Tea Party movement and just conservatism in general has focused a lot on the founding fathers, and that's amazing, but I'm very fascinated by our founding grandfathers or great-grandfathers, the people who created the culture that our founding fathers were raised in.

0:00:44
Isn't that a fascinating era? We got like 1776, like that's great, I love it, I want to know more, I don't know nearly enough. But what about the 1720s? What was going on there? Or the late 1600s? What was going on in America at that time? And you know, we've all heard of the Puritans, but you ...

Morning Motivation, April 21, 2023
Inflation and ANGER

I am angry and frustrated. With our Rulers. For getting us in this terrible economy. It doesn't have to be this way.

How could they never learn from past mistakes! This is ANCIENT history, stop printing money...yet, after COVID, we never printed more. Amazing.

Please leave a 5-star review on Itunes. We have a ton of momentum, this is about to break through! Thank you!

Also, I haven't done any lives anywhere becauase we're hosting a daily TV show "Road to Misterms" on thefirsttv.com, and it's taken all of my extra time. And my wife is giving birth any day now, so...it's been a lot around here. But after the midterms, time will free up.

Inflation and ANGER
Politics by Faith: Parkland and the Death Penalty

I've gone back and forth on the death penalty many times over the years. I've recently come down on the other side.

Should the Parkland murderer have gotten the death penalty or life in prison?

Please leave a review on iTunes! We need to get to 1k :-)
www.thefirsttv.com/mikeslater

Btw, we're getting the momentum we need, more downloads every day, THANK YOU!

Politics by Faith: Parkland and the Death Penalty

This is spot on Mike! We have become dehumanized! You can not read a persons real needs on a screen nor text! A job or passion offers human interaction and I pray these stay at home on our tax dollars find that truth. We have lost our way… People need hugs and love and someone to listen. If we do not have that face to face interaction we will become nothing more than those who can not deal with lives issues.
Our politicians need to stop thinking about themselves and their agenda and think of the country as a whole. My suggestion today is go out and make someone’s life a little better than it is and not with money! And if it is only leave a space better than you found it -imagine if everyone left every place better than they found it. If you did one thing to make another human beings life better and told them you loved them. If we did this every day- what a great world we would have again! Time to get back to this countries MOTTO… if you do not know the counties motto it is ...

Good morning @MikeSlater and all my fellow Slater Crusaders! I've been following Mike for years and after having MANY one way conversations with the radio or podcast, have finally joined the community here on locals.com. I can't wait for the chance to share thoughts and ideas with you all. Thank you Mike for creating this place. I hope we can help inform each other about our world and support growing our relationship and faith in Jesus.

Hi @Mike Slater! Are you coming back to locals? Haven’t seen any posts in some time.

Zohran Mamdani and Masquerading Light
Politics By Faith, june 30, 2025

Be careful of people and ideas who look like The Light, but it's all an act.

Welcome to Politics by Faith. Thank you for being here. One big beautiful bill. That is the main news of the day. I want to take a bit of that and also highlight something a bit different before I forget it.

We'll bring it all together.

Zoran Memdani may be the next mayor of New York City. This is the 33-year year old Muslim communist from Uganda. The latest mini controversy is that his team made a video of him talking about something where he's eating some rice dish with his hands. Like an animal.

Like they do in a foreign, perhaps third world country.

And it's all performative. like they do in a foreign, perhaps third world country.

And it's all performative. He's got the microphone on a shirt. Like he could have waited to eat and answer the question without, but he did on purpose. And also he knows how to use a fork and knife. There's other campaign pictures of him eating a burrito with a fork and knife, which is a food item

that you're supposed to eat with your hands. So he's doing them both backwards. But the point is, eating with the hands, it's all performative gesture. It's a game, it's an act to appeal to certain people to get attention as well.

And they knew what they were doing. They're like, here, eat this with your hands. They knew. Someone on Twitter said, His mother is a world famous Academy Award nominated Bollywood director worth tens of millions of dollars. His father is a chaired professor at Columbia. He is a perpetual theater kid who's pretending to be third world.

The great Rob Henderson said, rich kid eats rice with his hands. More performative modesty aimed at manipulating you into thinking he's just a regular guy like Castro and his fatigues or Mao and his peasant tunic always the same playbook with rich kid socialists It's also funny. It's a funny place that we're at in politics where we used to mock politicians because they were eating pizza the wrong way or are they they would look awkward when eating a hot dog at the State Fair and

Now we have politicians running for office who are eating rice with their hands. All right, but here's my main point here. I want to steal this from Cernovich. He said, in our inverted society, and indeed everything's backwards,

the demons look soft and non-threatening, and the angels look scary, which is biblical. Mamdani is on the cover of the New Yorker and he looks great. It's a nice photo shoot and smiling and it's all, it's all nice. Communism, but with a nice happy smile on it, soft and non-threatening. The demons look soft and non-threatening.

The angels look scary, which is biblical. And he's right. Satan is not what our pop culture portrays him to look like. I think it's actually an act of the devil to have him portrayed the way he is with red horns and a pitchfork and all that. But the Bible says that Satan disguises himself as an angel of light. Second Corinthians 11, 14. He's also the father of lies, John 8, 44. So of course he's going to approach us as something good and beautiful

and safe and easy and full of light. Now, to be clear, the Bible doesn't say that Satan is an angel of light, only that he masquerades as one. So that is how we will see Satan and his deeds as light. Light is good in the Bible. John 8, 44 says,

"'Whoever says he is in the light and hates his brother is still in darkness. Whoever loves his brother abides in the light, and in him there is no cause for stumbling." God created the light, 2nd Corinthians 6, 4, for God who said, let light shine out of darkness has shown in our hearts to give the light of the knowledge of the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ. It was Moses, wasn't

it? Who after he spoke with God on Mount Sinai, he came back down and his face was shining. Just light pouring off of his face. So light is good. So of course Satan is going to appear as the angel of light. Of course Satan is gonna say, come to me! I am the light! Which is why we have to be very careful. We have to stay close to God, stay close to his word. Psalm 119 says, your word God is a lamp to my feet and a light to my path. So how do you stay close to God and know that it's his light? You read the Bible. Your word, the Bible, is a lamp to our feet, lights our path.

Now on the flip side, which is also pretty interesting, God's angels are so terrifying that people fall to their knees. And every time the angel has to say, fear not. Now you've maybe seen this before on the internet. Some artists made biblically accurate angels Now, you may have seen this before on the internet.

Some artists made biblically accurate angels. You can search for that at your own caution here. These are artist composites of Ezekiel. Ezekiel 1, his vision of God and his throne. And Ezekiel goes into detail here. Let's see here. Each had four faces and each had four wings. Their hands of a man were under the wings on their four sides. Each had four faces and wings.

Their wings touched one another. Let's see. There's more craziness here. Each of the four had the face of a lion on the right side. Each of the four had the face of an ox on the left side. Each of the four had the face of an eagle. A little further down on Ezekiel. Here it is. This is about wheels. Here we go. The appearance of their workings was as it were a wheel in the middle of a wheel. When they moved, they went towards any one of four directions. They did not turn aside when they went. As for the rims, they

were so high. They were awesome. And the rims were full of eyes all around the four of them. So it's a circle full of eyes. When the living creatures went, the wheels went beside them. Goodness me. So, if you saw one of those, you wouldn't be like, oh, yay, look an angel. You would fall on your face and the angel would have to say, don't be afraid. Now, I don't know if that's what all angels look like. There's certain angels, I'm not an angel expert here, but the point is the inversion,

where Satan and demonic influences in this world come as light, and people are attracted to that, just like people are attracted to socialism, because it always looks good. I don't think it sounds good even. A lot of people say that, they'll be like,

oh, maybe communism sounds good, but it never works. I don't even think it sounds good. But some people still think that it is a light. Now, if I have to tie in the one big beautiful bill, which we'll do more on tomorrow, surely, it's just the deceitfulness of all of it.

The accounting, how they measure this, calculate that, move this around, change a word here or there. We'll do more on the radio show tomorrow of the Inflation Reduction Act, the green new scam stuff that's in it and taken out of it and then put back in it

and then a couple words changed here and there. So again, we'll do more of this tomorrow, but the house had in there that you will remove your solar subsidy if, unless something is in construction by a certain date. So this new wind or energy or solar project

has to be in construction by next year. But in construction only means 5% of the project. That's it. And that's in construction. So people are just gonna throw 5% into a project and then, oh, we're in, we're good.

And then they get four more years of subsidies. And the Senate did change it to, no, no, it's gotta be placed in service, which means it has to be done by the end of the year 2028. So a couple slight word changes here changes the whole game.

And the Senate's going back and forth on that whole thing. So we'll give you an update on what the Senate does with that tomorrow. But there's so much deceit in politics and that is one of the reasons why it's so chaotic and of course one of the reasons why there's so much anxiety around it as well. So much lying, so much deceit, so much ignorance, trying to control an entire country of 330 million Americans. Our founding fathers knew better. But free and

easy and entitlements and all this stuff, all these, this, this fake light seems so appealing and we've fallen for it for so long. Now people can't even imagine another way. We'll see how the one big beautiful bill does tonight. But my point is here, stay close to God so that we know when it is actually Satan masquerading as the angel of light and be aware of ideas and policies and philosophies that masquerade as truth as well. and be aware of ideas and policies and philosophies that masquerade as truth as well.

Mike Slater dot locals dot com. That's the website where we put the transcript up

 

Read full Article
Yo Daddy's Home
Politics By Faith, June 27, 2025

The head of NATO, sort of, in the middle of an analogy, called President Trump "Daddy". Every other president would have tried to spin it away, but Trump leaned in to it. 

Welcome to Politics by Faith. Thank you for being here. I want to talk about something that happened at the NATO conference the other day. So start at the beginning here. Trump was getting on Marine One at the White House and he was asked about Iran and Israel. This was right after the ceasefire was announced and they were still launching a couple more missiles at each other. And Trump's like, I'm angry at everyone, but they've been fighting And he was asked about Iran and Israel. This was right after the ceasefire was announced and they were still launching a couple more missiles at each other.

And Trump's like, I'm angry at everyone, but they've been fighting for thousands of years. They're so screwed up. They're so messed up. It's all they know. And he said, they don't know what the blank they're doing.

And he turned and he got on the helicopter. He gets on the helicopter, helicopter goes over to the Netherlands for the big NATO conference and he's sitting next to the head of NATO and a reporter asks him, hey man, you dropped the F-bomb the other day, you know, tell me about that. Here's what Trump said. I mean, we may do papers on it,

Marco. Maybe we're going to do papers. I don't even know if you need them. They're not going to be fighting each other. They've had it. They've had a big fight, like two kids in a school yard. You know, they fight like hell. You can't stop them. Let them fight for about two, three minutes. Then it's easier to stop them.

And then daddy has to sometimes use strong language.

You have to use strong language.

Every once in a while, you have to use a certain word.

I think that-

Okay, so people took that, some people in the media spun that as the head of NATO called Trump daddy. Now, he clearly didn't. He wasn't like, hey, Trump daddy. Trump was using an analogy of parenting with two kids and then he working with the analogy said, oh, well, you know, then daddy comes home.

All right, here we have, I kind of call them daddy, okay? So then Trump was asked about that later.

It's from Sky News. Mark Ritter, the NATO chief, who is your friend, he called you daddy earlier. Do you regard your NATO allies as kind of children?

No, he likes me. I think he likes me. If he doesn't, I'll let you know. I'll come back and I'll hit him hard. Okay. Do you he likes me. If he doesn't, I'll let you know. I'll come back and I'll hit him hard. Okay. He did. He did it very affectionate. He daddy, you're my daddy. Do

you have a God? You're okay. So Marco Rubio is in the background just busting up. Okay. So then the head of NATO was asked about calling him daddy.

Thank you. Deborah Haynes from Sky News. Same woman, same woman. She's obsessed with this. She's absolutely obsessed. Deborah Haynes from Sky News. Hello. The language that you have used when talking to Donald Trump has been notable because of its flattery. Today you called him daddy. You sent a text message.

Now, again, to be clear, he didn't. But you heard what happened.

To him that was gushing with praise. Is this the way that you feel you have to act when doing business with the US president through flattery and praise? Isn't it a bit demeaning and doesn't it make you look weak?

Ooh.

Okay. Let me pull up the text that she is referring to. So Trump the other day, screenshot it, a text that he, the head of NATO, said, Trump says, Mr. President, dear Donald, congratulations. And thank you for your decisive action in Iran. That was truly extraordinary and something no one else dared to do.

It makes us all safer. You're flying into another big success in the Hague this evening, the Netherlands. It was not easy, but we've got all of them signed on to 5%. We'll get to that in a minute. Don, you've driven us to a really, really important moment for American Europe and the world. You will choose something no American president in decades could get done. Europe is going to pay in a big way as they should, and it and see you at his majesty's dinner. I don't know, is that fawning? That flattery or like, hey, great job.

No, I don't think so. I think it's a bit of a question of taste, but I think he's a good friend. And when he is doing stuff, which is forcing us to, for example, when it comes to making more investments, would you ever think that this would be the result

of this summit if he would not have been elected president? Do you really think that seven or eight countries who said, yeah, somewhere in the 2030s we might meet the 2%? We've now all decided in the last four or five months to get to 2%. So doesn't he deserve some praise? And when it comes to Iran, the fact that he took this decisive action, very targeted, to make sure that Iran would not be able to get his hands on a nuclear capability. I think he deserves all the praise.

Okay. Now that leads up to this. Oh, should we talk about the 5%? Stop at the 5% quick. So when Trump's first term, he said, Hey, NATO countries, you all need to pay more. And the media said, oh, Trump's attacking NATO.

Well, no, he's not attacking NATO. He's saying he's saying countries need to spend more money, which strengthens NATO. Well, that was 2%. What Mark had a NATO is talking about is now the country's agreed to spend 5% of their GDP on defense. And that's what he's saying is that no one would have no country would have done that if it weren't for Trump. Trump strengthened NATO. Now, Spain is not playing along. So Trump said, I'm going to make them pay double tariffs.

He's like Spain. They think they're going to free ride through in NATO without paying more for defense. No, it's not going to happen. So you're just going to pay double tariffs to the United States. No more freeloading. That's what they're talking about there.

Now, here's what happened yesterday.

Saw this on Trump's Instagram.

After every trip he makes, they do like this hype reel video of him, you know, getting off Air Force One and all the things, right? Everywhere he goes, they put these out every week or so. And this is the one they put out yesterday.

♪ I just wanna get your attention.

You want to be all up in your head. I don't. It's kind of a weird song choice. I don't want to be my first choice. I don't some like weird kind of pop song thing, but okay, I will keep listening here. So the song is by Usher. It's called Daddy's Home.

And all the video is of him meeting with NATO leaders. Here's the NATO flag. Here's Pete Hagseth. Here's Marco Rubio. Here's Trump at the podium. So fit, just perfect. Every other president would have put their whole crisis team on this, send out press releases saying, Oh no, no, that's no we're gonna make our allies feel good no we're not daddy we're all equal members in a league of

nations Trump's team comes out and says I know you've been waiting for this loving all day. You know your daddy's home. Very good. Very good. Well done. Very funny. All right.

So what do we do with this? How do we turn this into a biblical segment? Well, God is your real daddy. No, I'm not going to, not going to do that. Not going to make that point. Abba means daddy.

I want to make a point about delight. This is fun. Right? Trump is having fun. You see him up there when he's having fun. It's fun to watch.

This whole administration is having fun. Hard work of course, but they're doing it all with a smile. The other day we did a segment on the origin of peace through strength. Where did that idea come from? It didn't come from Reagan. It came from the year 400. The other day we did a segment on the origin of peace through strength. Where did that idea come from? It didn't come from Reagan. It came from the year 400. There was a book called De Re Militaris written by Flavius Vigetius Renatus.

It's about Roman warfare and the line is, if you want peace then prepare for war. Then we did the origin of the line, speak softly but carry a big stick. That came from Teddy Roosevelt, 1901, Minnesota State Fair. It is a beautiful speech, highly recommend it. Just search for national duties, Teddy Roosevelt, 1901, and it'll pop up, it's a beautiful speech.

But where did the term happy warrior come from? It's another line that people associate with Reagan, right? The happy warrior, where did that come from? That came from a Wordsworth poem, William Wordsworth, that's gotta be the best name of a poet, right? He wrote a poem called Character of a Happy Warrior,

another beautiful read. But let me just go through, instead of making it poetic, I'll just give you a list here. A happy warrior has a generous spirit, noble ideals, an inner light, a sense of purpose, eager to learn, he has moral integrity,

turns adversity into advantage, can meet the worst that can befall the best and make it his own good. I would argue that's what Trump did with the whole daddy thing. Self-control, passionate, forgiving, resilient,

guided by reason, virtuous, honorable, faithful to duty, unselfish, courageous, serene in adversity, the line is, can meet the storm and keep his heart serene, loving, loyal, persevering, unwavering purpose. And who of course in world history has best exemplified all of these wonderful characteristics? That would be Jesus, every one of them.

For some reason right now, serene and adversity stands near the top of them all, but he is all of them. And we're called to show these as much as we possibly can as well. And when I think of the happy warrior, I want to put the emphasis on the happy part, but what does that mean? I like the word delight. And that reminds me of Psalm 37, four, delight yourself in the Lord. Have fun with these other things,

but delight yourself in the Lord. Trust in the Lord and do good. Dwell in the land and feed on his faithfulness. Delight yourself also in the Lord and he shall give you the desires of your heart. I just want to focus on the delight yourself

in the Lord part. Charles Spurgeon, he said, Believers who know Christ understand that delight and faith are so blessedly united that the powers of hell cannot separate them. Those who love God with all their heart find that his ways are pleasant ways and all his paths are peace. Proverbs 317. Such joy, such abundant delight, such overflowing blessedness. The saints discover in their Lord, so much so that

far from serving him out of obligation, they would still follow him even if the whole world put down his name as evil. We don't fear God because of any compulsion. Our faith is no shackle, our profession, no slavery. We are not dragged to holiness or driven to duty. No, our devotion is pleasure. Our hope is happiness, our duty, delight.

Have fun, happy warrior. Whatever it is you do, do it with all the great virtues from that Wordsworth poem. And throughout it all, delight yourself in the Lord. Mike Slater dot locals dot com transcript and commercial free if you want to listen over there and commercial free if you want to listen over there on the website Mike Slater dot locals dot com.

 

Read full Article
The Muslim, Communist Mayor of NYC
Politics By Faith, June 26, 2025

NYC might elect a Muslim, communist from Uganda as their next mayor. How is this possible? Because people want fast and free. We want something more.

Welcome to Politics by Faith. Thank you for being here. Been working on some thoughts here about the New York City mayor's race. Zohan Mamdani, 33-year-old Muslim communist from Uganda, who it's pretty likely will become the next mayor of New York City. Made a bunch of different arguments this morning, of course, how did this happen? I don't think it's immigrants, although that's

certainly part of it. You know, do you know what percentage of New York City is foreign born? It's 40%. So that's clearly part of it, but this is mostly homegrown. Uh, what got him across the finish line was progressive white women, rich, progressive white women. Mostly we'd talked about it for three hours today. So I can't do the whole thing. I'll just tell you what he stands for and what he's calling for. He's calling to end the NYPD, like totally defund the police, abolish prisons, abolish medical bills, abolish private health insurance,

ban all guns, legalized sex work, safe injection sites end cash bail, decriminalize drug possession, end all cooperation with ICE. He said taxation isn't theft, capitalism is. $65 million on transgender medical treatments, including on kids. I mean, it's like as crazy, crazy as you can get.

There's so much to be said here. I think my, well, I'll just make two quick points and then I'll get to the new stuff. This is the future of the Democratic Party. When the baby boomer generation passes on. The Clintons and Bloomberg

and all those establishment Democrats who have been around forever who endorsed Cuomo, they'll be gone and we will all this whole country will be left with Zohan dumb daddies, daddies all over the country. That's the future of the democratic party. It's the first point.

Second point. I don't want to cede any ground to communists in America. If, if we were talking about the capital of Uganda, electing a communist mayor, probably wouldn't talk about it, but it's New York city. This is in the United States of America. And I totally understand this desire to just let them, you know, they voted for these people, let them have it and they'll learn from their mistakes. But I don't agree with that anymore. We saw what happened when

we did that with college campuses. I thought that all the wackiness on college campuses would just stay in the bubble, but it doesn't stay in the bubble. Now all the craziness from the Ivy League schools is that every university and in K through 12 and med schools and law schools and teaching schools and every other institution across America doesn't just stay in the bubble and it won't just stay in New York, maybe start in New York, but it won't stay in New York. And I don't want to cede any ground

to communists. Let me move on to something new though. Nature does what's easiest. This is one of the reasons why evolution is so stupid. Because nature doesn't get better on its own. Nothing can't evolve up into an eye.

Right?

You can't have nothing and it just gets better because turning into an eye would be hard to do. And that's not how nature works. We were in the Grand Tetons a week or so ago. There's rivers everywhere. And they come from. We were in the Grand Tetons a week or so ago. There's rivers everywhere. And they come from the snow melt in the mountains.

And the rivers are fast. These are fast moving rivers and it just keeps coming. There's just an endless supply of water that's constantly rushing down the mountain. And you're in the river, these big huge rivers, you're like, where is this? This water just keeps coming and it goes all summer long, and the snow never melts away.

I mean, it's snow melt, so some is melting, but you look up in there, you're like, it's still there? And it's there all summer long. And we're on this, we're hiking around this lake. It's the most popular there's this huge waterfall. It's about a hundred feet tall. It's awesome.

And you're watching this waterfall and it comes, pours down, it's huge, pours down. And then it hits the side of this rock and it turns 90 degrees and it comes at you. It's so powerful. And at some point in the trip, it would just fascinated me and I'm living it

now that these rivers at one point in time, who forever ago first cut their way through the mountains, like the water's up top and it's got to get down and the water's gonna take the easiest path. And my point is once it makes its path, that's it. The path is set. It's not gonna change. Nothing naturally is going to move that waterfall to a new place or any of the rivers.

They're not going to change. There can be some erosion, of course, but it's not gonna be like, you know what's a better direction? Uphill and around the rivers. They're not going to change. There can be some erosion of course, but it's not going to be like, you know what's a better direction uphill and around the bend and that like that doesn't once the path is set, once it has its foothold, it's never going to give it up. And even if humans wanted to change, it would be a massive task for humans to come in and divert

that river to make a new waterfall or a different waterfall, even if we wanted to. My point is, this is why we can't let communists win elections anywhere. Because the devil gets a foothold. The river makes its groove. People keep voting certain ways. It's really hard, if not impossible, to change that path.

Nature does what's easiest, and so do people. This is why last week we talked about AI boyfriends and AI girlfriends, and I said that a majority of people will do this. If there's any kids listening now, you may want to hide their ears for a second. But a majority of people watch pornography pornography and it's the same principle it's selfish and easy once physical ones emotional but it's the same principle and

so it's communism it's easy the pitch is easy it is brilliant for Mamdani to call for free buses but he doesnani to call for free buses, but he doesn't just call for free buses or the elimination of bus fares. He doesn't call it, he calls it fast and free. Now it's not really free and someone's gotta pay for it.

Taxes, and of course it won't be fast. It's neither of those things, but the marketing is brilliant because it appeals to what people want. It appeals to people being selfish and easy, fast and free. This is what we want everything to be. We want everything to be fast and free.

And we have an entire political party and a massive cultural movement that provides people with all their heart's desires, whatever appeals to people's sinful nature. Fast and free, sometimes at a price. But, or at least a monetary price, there's always a real price, but we know that what's easy

is almost never what's best for the individual or what's best for society. Tonight for dinner, you know the easy thing is to just grab some ice cream from the freezer. That's the easy thing. But the better thing is to get some chicken and broccoli and cook it up and eat it. But that's harder.

We all know what the right thing is to do.

But the 99 cent tacos at Taco Bell, that's fast and pretty almost free. And it gets the job done. But does it? I mean, it'll satiate you in the moment, but long-term it destroys you. We all know that.

We know that the easy thing is rarely the right thing. Now we, unfortunately, as conservatives, we are members of a political party that advocate for hard things. We call upon people to engage in hard work and to strive. We call for virtue and accomplishing things.

The other party advocates for fast and free. Now I'd rather be on our team because our team when we accomplish what we stand for leads to greatness. But man, it's harder to win elections that way, isn't it? Here's the last analogy I wanna make

and then we'll get to the Bible. June 25th, 20, or excuse me, June 25th, 1929. President Herbert Hoover authorized the construction of the Hoover Dam. The Hoover Dam is a spectacular achievement, stunningly beautiful, stunningly beautiful in every way.

And it's full of art. The people who built this dam, who designed it and built it, they believed that they were building something that would last forever. I'd love one day, we can spend more time on this, but they built a celestial map on the site of the Hoover Dam

where, it's not ancient, where civilizations, thousands of years in the future from now, can read this map and figure out just by the stars, the positions of the stars and what's characterized on this map when this Hoover Dam was built.

Not using any words, but when the dam was built because they really believed that they were making this for something that would last forever, as forever as humans can build a thing, even without maintenance. I think they said it can last for a thousand years as humans can build a thing. Even without maintenance. I think they said it can last for a thousand years

without any maintenance on it even. Things spectacular, but it's beautiful too. It's built in this beautiful art deco theme. And it's an incredible engineering achievement that we're still celebrating today. We're still benefiting from today.

They finished it in five years, two years ahead of schedule. 21,000 people. It provides power today for 1.3 million homes. Water for Southern California, Arizona. So they built it fast, ahead of schedule, and it still works. People of California high-speed rail

can learn a lesson from here. But here's why I wanted to bring it up here. 100 people died making this thing. There's a big plaque at the Hoover Dam. And it says, they died. So there's this man, this art deco man

rising out of the water. And it says they died to make the desert bloom. The desert doesn't bloom on its own. It takes hard work to make it bloom. All good things. Now, of course, God does all of this, right?

God even, he made the concept of blooming and he made flowers and he made, right? So all this is God and God could do, of course, but our role on the earth is to participate in that creation and to create and make beautiful things too. And that can't be done without effort. The left promises fast and free, fast and free, everything fast and free, everything. It never works. Of course. Can't never can. Uh, like meaning the buses will never be like those won't work. It'll work when

it like getting elected. It'll work in that regard, but it'll never actually work in governance. But they promise fast and free, very appealing. We promise good, beautiful, and true. It's much more difficult, but obviously it's better. Satan's world is one of temptation. When people are selfish and want the easy way. I just this morning,

I kid you not just this morning, read Proverbs 28 and it says, better is the poor who walks in his integrity than one perverse in his ways, though he'd be rich. In his ways, like his own ways. Better to be poor and walk in his integrity than one perverse in his own ways, even though he be rich. This one stood out, again, this is Proverbs 28, 20. A faithful man will abound with blessings,

but he who hastens to be rich will not go unpunished. Hastens means quickly, but like you'll do anything to be rich will not go unpunished. Hastens means quickly, but you'll do anything to get rich. You'll cheat, you'll compromise, you'll do whatever it takes to get rich. I must be rich and nothing else matters. You will not go unpunished this life or the next, but the hasten, the fast, I want it now. Me, me, me now fast and free. Another one of Proverbs 28, a man with an evil eye hastens after riches and does not consider the poverty that

will come upon him. Fast and free. And just speaking to the how the good things the righteous is hard. It takes effort. It takes effort. 1st Corinthians 9. Do you not know, says Paul, do you not know that those who run in a race all run but one receives the prize run in such a way that you may obtain it. Go get it. And everyone who competes for the prize is temperate in all things. Now they do it to obtain a perishable crown but we for an

imperishable crown. See all these people competing in like the Olympics, they do it for a silly medal or crown, right? But we do it for one that lasts forever. Therefore I run in this way, not with uncertainty. Thus I fight not as one who beats the air, like silliness, but I discipline my body and bring it into subjection.

Lest when I've preached to others, I myself should become disqualified. They had like these, this athletic competitions in Corinth. So he's using their language, but run in a way that you could win it, train for it, be disciplined, just like the great athletes are.

But here's what's interesting. When he says, I, where is it? I discipline my body. We don't translate that quite right. The actual Greek means to beat black and blue, to smite so as to cause bruises and livid spots like a boxer beats his body, to be disciplined by hardships. It means to give a black eye. That's what he's talking about, discipline.

Why? To bring the body into submission. Meaning to make the body my slave. So with the temptations in the world, we act like our souls are slaves of the body, that the body's in charge, right? Our emotions drive our actions, our desires, our impulses, our cravings, our lusts. So much

of politics today is about feelings. Well, I feel this, I feel like that, I feel for these people, I feel, I feel, right? I feel all the time. I'm gonna cry, that person's crying, oh we better do what they want, they're crying. It's all about the feels, what feels good. Because for most people, our body, the flesh, is the master over our soul. So we do whatever the body says. But Paul here says, no, flip that around,

bring your body into subjection. Now that doesn't mean work on your six pack, although that's good too, but work against your lusts. Like your body's not in charge of your soul. Your soul with the Holy Spirit needs to be in charge of your body, meaning all the temptations around us,

all the promises of fast and free. Politically, this is a very difficult thing to do. It's definitely the uphill battle, but I believe it is the good one. And spiritually, it's the most important thing.

And Jesus took the ultimate beating and punishment for all of our sins, not just physically on the cross, but all the sins of the whole world on him as well. Mike Slater dot locals.com transcript commercial free on the website, Mike Slater dot locals dot com. Transcript commercial free on the website. Mike Slater dot locals.com transcript commercial free on the website, Mike Slater dot locals dot com. Transcript commercial free on the website. Mike Slater dot locals dot com.

 

Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals