MikeSlater
Politics • Spirituality/Belief • Culture
Separation of Church and State is a lie.
Politics by Faith, June 20, 2024
June 20, 2024

Don't let anyone get away with this misconception again. Thomas Jefferson did NOT mean that the church will have no influence in government. He meant that the government will have no control over the affairs of the church. We got it completely backward.


Welcome to Politics by Faith, brought to you by the Patriot Gold Group. Thanks for being here. So Louisiana just passed a law that says the Ten Commandments have to be posted in every single classroom in the state, including in colleges. And we'll have to just freak it out. So we did a segment on this on Breitbart News Daily.

I just want to present the whole segment to you here and please arm yourself with these facts and never let anyone, anyone ever get away with saying that separation of church and state was meant or intended to clear all Christian influence out of public life and even out of government life. That is so absurd and I'll hopefully fully and thoroughly debunk it right here. The very short of it. Separation of church and state. It was not meant to keep the church out of government. It was meant to keep the government out of church. Here's the full story about the separation

0:01:05
of church and state. I want to start off this hour with this though, Louisiana, first state country to mandate that the Ten Commandments be placed in every school classroom. Like it used to be. But I guess it was never mandated in the past. We just did it. Everyone just did it because we were a Christian nation.

0:01:33
Just as we were founded on. So here's what it says in Louisiana. A poster-sized display of the Ten Commandments in large easily readable font that's good you got to put the easy you know someone can like put it in Wingdings like there it is it's just in Wingdings easily readable comic sans in all public classrooms from kindergarten to state-funded universities this is

0:02:00
great so it's going to be sued into oblivion, of course. And the governor said, I can't wait to be sued. The posters, which will be paired with a four-paragraph context statement describing how the Ten Commandments were a prominent part of American public education for almost three centuries, must be placed in classrooms by the start of 2025. The posters can't be paid for with state funds.

0:02:23
So they're getting around one of the one of the arguments is gonna be made so I can only be paid for by donations so what what does each poster cost four dollars maybe like should be like 50 cents but knowing it's the government I'll chip in four bucks for for a poster the law also authorizes but does not require the display of other items in K through 12 schools including the Mayflower Compact, which was signed by the Pilgrims,

0:02:53
the Board of the Mayflower, often referred to as America's first constitution. That'd be fun to go over. We should talk about that one. The Declaration of Independence, Northwest Ordinance, which established a government in the Northwest Territory

0:03:03
in present-day Midwest, and created a pathway for admitting new states to the Union. So the court decided this issue back in 1980. And it was in Kentucky. The school was in Kentucky, it was a 5-4 decision that the Ten Commandments served no secular purpose and was only a religious resource and therefore

0:03:27
constituted a law respecting an establishment of religion. And it's high time we revisit that absurd decision, just like we've revisited many Supreme Court decisions over time. We're now at the 70th anniversary of Brown v. Board of Education so that's that's great so we can we can revisit Supreme Court decisions. They're not etched in stone. See what I did there? Zach that was a that was a Ten That's good.

0:03:59
I just want to make sure you caught it.

0:04:03
Are you not on our Raw Dog Comedy Channel? Take that, cut that, put that over on Raw Dog Comedy. Hey, you think this is funny? Check out Breitbart News Daily. Comedy like this. So listen, of course this is good.

0:04:27
If you, and of course this is nothing to freak out about, that's the other thing, if you walk into the House of Representatives, there are 23 marble reliefs of different figures all around the room of different people related to the development of law. And the first one, right over the door when you walk in, so you walk in, if you ever walk into the house of representatives chamber and look up look right behind you There's a relief of the main guy Moses

0:04:58
There he is that's the guy right there in the halls of Congress So obviously I'm for this and let me tell you why first about it's a first of all It's about high time that Christians go on the offense and stop being fooled into silence, stop being hoodwinked by this separation of church and state nonsense which everyone has backwards, I'll explain in just a minute. But Christians walked away from the public arena. We removed our religion and it was immediately replaced with many other pagan religions.

0:05:35
What do I mean pagan religions? I don't know exhibit a we're currently in the middle of pride month There's a pagan religion right there. You don't think that's a religion of course. It's a religion. We left they filled it in I'm against this law I'm against this law Because it doesn't also require the beatitudes be placed in every single classroom doesn't go nearly far enough. Ten Commandments, good start.

0:06:07
And don't come at me with this hypothetical, well, Slater, what if Buddhists want their dumb Buddha sayings on the wall? We don't live in a Buddhist nation. If the founders were Buddhist, then we could talk. If we were founded as a Buddhist nation, we'll have a

0:06:30
conversation. If we were living in Sri Lanka, then yes, I would expect a statue of a fat guy in every classroom. All right? But we don't. So that's a stupid hypothetical. What if the Buddhists? Now we got to let the Buddhists. No, you don't. Well, now you got to let the Satanists. No, you don't. You don't have to now do that.

0:06:50
Here's what the poster says. So hide your children.

0:06:52
Hide your children. I'm going to quote the Ten Commandments here.

0:06:54
Just so you know. Just so you know exactly what's in every... You know what we're talking about here, right?

0:06:57
You just hear...

0:06:58
So that the media, they don't tell you things.

0:07:00
They don't tell you the things. I've read all these articles and none of the articles have a link to what is actually put up on the wall. Right? They don't have any context. They don't have any story, they don't tell you the thing that you need to know. But hide your kids, I'm going to read the text. By the way, I saw a video of a mom, a cool mom, with maybe her, probably Johnny's,

0:07:30
probably four years old, old enough to know what he's doing, but young enough that they still think it's cute. And they were singing the Please Please Please song. Producer Zach, I know you're a big pop star. I got, who sings Please Please Please?

0:07:44
I'll have to look it up.

0:07:45
Sabrina Carpenter. There you go, Sabrina Carpenter. And that's like the big pop song right now. And the kids dropping F-bombs. And everyone thinks it's hilarious. So, that's great.

0:07:57
But come at someone with, come at that same person with the Ten Commandments and they're like whoa, whoa vulgar vulgar I got children in the car. All right The text shall read as follows the Ten Commandments I am the Lord thy God Thou shalt have no other gods before me thou shalt not make to thyself any graven images Thou shalt not take the name of the Lord thy God in vain

0:08:20
Remember the Sabbath day to keep it holy. Honor thy father and thy mother, that thy days may be long upon the land which the Lord thy God giveth thee. Thou shalt not kill, thou shalt not commit adultery, thou shalt not steal, thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbor, thou shalt not covet thy neighbor's house, thou shalt not covet thy neighbor's wife, nor his manservant, nor his maidservant, nor

0:08:48
his cattle, nor anything that is thy neighbors.

0:08:51
There you go.

0:08:52
It's got to be in every classroom in Louisiana. All right, I got, which by the way, that used to be in every classroom in America not that

0:08:58
long ago.

0:08:59
All right, I got two arguments. I was watching a debate the other day between Michael Knowles, who I like a lot, big fan of Michael Knowles, big Michael Knowles fan. I appreciate him very much. And there was a debate between him and this famous British atheist guy who I guess is becoming more and more popular. His name is Alex O'Connor.

0:09:23
I think. Yes, Alex O'Connor. Alright, so it's Michael Knowles and Alex O'Connor. And the question was, is America a Christian nation? Or was America founded as a Christian nation or something and this atheist guy brought up Thomas Jefferson and his separation of church and state and Michael Knowles who I love missed it totally missed it and I I don't make

0:09:52
this argument really much anymore because I think everyone's sick of hearing it but apparently we need to keep making it because I guess not everyone knows it. So I'm going to do it in full here. And I'm going to read it in full because we're adults. And it's serious exam and there's no commercials really. So we have plenty of time.

0:10:16
But I don't want to insult you. I think the media is insulting. Every time I read some article about how, oh you know, to make your reels more successful, they need to be quicker and faster. And it's like, particularly adult people can think, we can like read a thing and, no, no, cut to the chase. All right, so here's the back.

0:10:43
This is the story of separation of church and state. All right, everyone's got it backwards. Here's the story. There's a letter written by the Danbury, Connecticut Baptist Association. They were a religious sect that was persecuted by the Congregationalists at the time. They were the Puritans, basically. That were the majority in Connecticut. So Connecticut, the majority of people there

0:11:04
were Puritans. Yale was a Congregationalist seminary in 1701. So this is a Congregationalist state, Connecticut. But you got these Baptists who are there and the Baptists are like, hey, we were being persecuted here by our fellow Connecticutians. And so they wrote a letter, the Danbury Baptists wrote a letter to Thomas Jefferson, the new president, got this new president in here and these Baptists were worried that Thomas Jefferson, who's now in charge of the federal government was

0:11:42
going to impose religious laws and mandates on them or I should say laws and mandates on their religion they were worried that Thomas Jefferson was gonna come down and crack down on them well now we got it coming from all sides we got it coming from everyone here in Connecticut and now we're gonna get it in Washington as well. So they wrote a letter. They're very worried. They didn't want the state imposing on their religion. So here's the letter. I'll quote it in full. Dear sir,

0:12:13
among the many millions in America and Europe who rejoice in your election to office, that's a lot of a lot of this stuff in the beginning, but it's good. We embrace the first opportunity which we have enjoyed in our collective capacity since your inauguration to express our great satisfaction in your appointment to the Chief Magistrate of the United States. And though our mode of expression may be less courtly and pompous than what many others clothe their addresses with, we beg you, sir, to believe that none are more sincere.

0:12:45
Our sentiments are uniformly on the side of religious liberty, that religion is at all times the place and matter between God and individuals. That no man ought to suffer a name, person, or effects on account of his religious opinions. That the legitimate power of civil government extends no further than to punish the man who works ill to his neighbor. So we are... so by the way, they're not saying... the Danbury Baptists are not saying, there should be no religion. They're saying like, leave us alone.

0:13:17
We just want to be left alone. So we are sensible that the president of the United States is not a national legislator. And also sensible that the national government cannot destroy the laws of each state. We'll get to that in a minute.

0:13:30
But our hopes are strong that the sentiments of our beloved president, which have had such great, I have such genial effect already, like the radiant beams of the sun, will shine and prevail through all these states and all the world, till hierarchy and tyranny be destroyed from the earth. Sir, when we reflect on your past services and see a glow of philanthropy

0:13:51
and goodwill shining forth in the course of more than thirty years, we have reason to believe that America's God has raised you up to fill the chair of state out of that good which he bears to the millions which you preside over. May God strengthen you for the arduous task which providence and the voice of the people have called you to sustain and support you in your administration against all predetermined opposition of those who wish to rise in wealth and importance on the poverty and subjugation of the people.

0:14:18
And may the Lord preserve you safe from every evil and shall bring you at last to his heavenly kingdom through Jesus Christ our glorious mediator. Danbury Baptist. There you go. So they're saying, listen, don't impose any religious mandates on us, please. Don't make any laws mandating us. Religion should be between God and an individual. No, we don't want any national laws telling us what to do. Please don't get involved in the affairs of our religion. That's the letter.

0:14:52
And here's what Thomas Jefferson said. Gentlemen, the affectionate sentiments of esteem and approbation which you're so good as to express towards me on behalf of the Danbury Baptist Association gives me the highest satisfaction. My duties dictate a faithful and zealous pursuit of the interest of my constituents and in proportion as they are persuaded of my fidelity to those

0:15:16
duties, the discharge of them becomes more and more pleasing. Happy to be your President. Believing with you that religion is a matter which lies solely between man and his God, that he owes account to none other for his faith or his worship, that the legitimate powers of government reach actions only, and not opinions. I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared

0:15:42
that their legislature, the Congress, shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, thus building a wall of separation between church and state. Adhering to this expression of the supreme will of the nation, the Constitution, in behalf of the rights of conscience, I shall see with sincere satisfaction the progress of those sentiments which tend to restore to man all his natural rights.

0:16:11
Convinced he has no natural right in opposition to his social duties, I reciprocate your kind prayers for the protection and blessing of the common Father and Creator of man, and tender you for yourself and your religious association assurances of my high respect and esteem Thomas Jefferson. You with me? This is the Danbury Baptist saying, hey new president please don't impose on us any laws that interfere with our religion and this is Thomas Jefferson saying, hey Baptist in Connecticut don't worry about it. I will not get involved in the affairs of

0:16:44
your church in any way at all. You do your thing. There's a wall of separation between me and you. There's a wall of separation between me and you. There's a wall of separation between me, the federal government, and you, the individual and the organization. Don't worry about you being able to practice your religion. The Constitution says that the Congress shall make no law

0:17:03
creating a national religion for everyone to adhere to. Congress shall make no law establishing a religion. So don't worry about it. We're not going to tell you what you need to do in your church. You're free to practice however you wish. So don't worry about me. There's a wall separating the federal government from you. Got it? What was this exchange not? This exchange was not some atheist association saying,

0:17:39
Hey, Thomas Jefferson, make sure no Christians ever have anything to do with government at all in any way. And it was not Thomas Jefferson responding, You're right, we should have no religion in any government thing in any way whatsoever. That's not what it was. Separation of church and state means that, Excuse me, let me say it like this.

0:18:01
It has come to mean, people have misinterpreted, it has been spun backwards to mean, that the church should have nothing to do with the government. But Thomas Jefferson was promising that the state will have nothing to do with the affairs of the church. I'll say it again. 99% of people think that separates the church and state means that the church, that Christians,

0:18:27
Christians should have nothing to do with government. There should be no Christian displays in public spheres or, you know, no Ten Commandments in the classroom. That the church, that Christians should have nothing to do with government. But Thomas Jefferson was saying that to the church, don't worry, the government will have nothing to do with the affairs of you. You're free to do what you want to do how you want to do it

0:18:51
the congress shall make no law saying you can't you see the switcheroo it's an old switcheroo totally backwards and if thomas jefferson came back for ten seconds that would be my first question i'm like thomas jefferson what do you mean by separation of church and make it clear

0:19:09
he's like i already made it clear read the letter And if you need any more evidence than the actual text I just read, by the way, 99% of people think separation of church and state is in the Constitution or in the Declaration. It's not. It's that letter. It's just that one letter he wrote, which with the context couldn't be more clear.

0:19:33
But if you need any more evidence than what I just read, when the first, so the claim is that the government should have nothing to do with religion or that the religion should When the First Amendment was ratified, each colony or state at this point had their own official religion. So the issue wasn't that states shouldn't have their own official religion or that there shouldn't be an official religion. It was that the federal government can't come up with their own official religion and impose

0:20:09
that on all the states. Because the Anglicans in Virginia, that was the official religion in Virginia at the time, the Anglicans in Virginia didn't want the Puritans in Massachusetts to mandate that we're all Puritans now, sorry Anglicans we're a puritan country this is the official religion we're now the the congregationalist country and the Anglicans are like well hold on Virginia is an Anglican state you can't you

0:20:37
federal government that we all created you can't come in here and tell us what religion we have to do have to be see the difference there were already established churches official state religions in every state at the exact passing of our First Amendment. And notice there were no Hindu states. There were no Muslim states. So we can do this all day. I just picked a few of them. This is the Virginia Declaration of Rights, 1776, written by George Mason. All men are

0:21:09
equally entitled to the free exercise of religion according to the dictates of conscience, and that it is a mutual duty of all to practice Christian forbearance, love, and charity towards each other. So even in the Declaration of Rights, like, hey, you guys can do whatever you want, and obviously we're all going to be Christians. People are like, hey, you know, it's not all about you and you Christians. Look, they say you can do whatever you want to get they were all Christian we're no buddhists here

0:21:42
so virginia was an anglican state the official state religion like we are in angla it wasn't like oh just a majority of the more anglican none of the official state religion was we are anglican so was new york massachusetts is congregationalist this is chapter 6 article one of their state constitution any person chosen governor the ten governor senate representative and accepting the trust,

0:22:03
shall before he proceed to execute the duties of his or her office, of his place or office, make and subscribe the following declaration." All right, so here's what you gotta do. You want to be, you want to be governor of Massachusetts, here's what you gotta say. I, insert name here, do hereby, excuse me, do declare that I believe the Christian religion... That's in the Massachusetts Constitution from 1780.

0:22:28
So you have to vow. So hold on. If these same people who passed the First Amendment were supposed to believe that, oh, no religion in anything at all related to government, those exact same people passed the Massachusetts Constitution in 1780 and their oath of office was I, insert name here, do declare that I believe the Christian religion, those same people did both those things?

0:22:51
You with me? The same people who wrote the Massachusetts Constitution and also ratified the federal government first amendment? You think they meant, oh, we really meant no religion in government. Delaware had no official religion. Aha! No official religion. All right, well, Well, here's the Delaware State Constitution 1776, Article 22. Every person who shall be chosen a member of either house or appointed to any place or office of trust shall take the following oath.

0:23:20
You thought the Massachusetts one was tough. I, insert name here, do profess faith in God the Father and in Jesus Christ his only Son and in the Holy Ghost, one God, blessed forevermore. This is the state that had no official religion. This was your oath of office I profess faith in God the Father and Jesus Christ his only Son and in the Holy Ghost one God bless it forever more

0:23:44
and I do acknowledge the holy scriptures of the Old Testament and New Testament to be given by divine inspiration that's the opening oath of office if you want to hold any office any public office in Delaware in 1776 and beyond but that but that what they really meant was no religion in politics. That's what they really meant. What are you kidding me?

0:24:08
Like this debate, was America founded as a Christian nation? Like, okay. Like, what are you talking about? How could you possibly say no? All right, let me say this. Here are some opinions you can have.

0:24:24
Oh, wait, so you can't tell me what to think. Okay, here's some opinions that you can have. You can say, I wish we weren't founded as a Christian nation. I wish we weren't. Okay, you can have that opinion. You can have the opinion, it was bad that we were founded as a Christian nation. Okay? You can think that, you're wrong, but you can think that. I disagree, but you can think that. You can think it was bad. You can say, we shouldn't be a Christian nation today.

0:25:08
Okay? I'll debate that. But to have this debate, were we founded as a Christian nation? Yes, of course. What are you talking about? Now you can even say, it's irrelevant that we were founded as a Christian nation. But you can't really, because the justification that people are using to not hang the Ten Commandments

0:25:32
is the First Amendment. They'll say, oh, the First Amendment says you can't hang the Ten Commandments. Okay, let's talk about the guys who wrote the first amendment. Because look at all these other state constitutions they passed that require you to profess faith in our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ before you become lieutenant governor. Yeah, but they really wanted a separation. Connecticut

0:26:00
was a congregational state as you said New Hampshire's New Hampshire the student have New Hampshire Constitution 1784 Every individual has a natural and unalienable right to worship God according to the dictates of his own conscience and reason because you're free To do whatever you want Nevertheless no person shall be capable of being elected a senator who is not of the Protestant religion But they were really against they wanted a separation. The same people from New Hampshire who thought that we should have no religion in government

0:26:31
and you need to be a Protestant in order to be in the state senate. You see how ridiculous that is? For people to think that we weren't a Christian country. This is a good one, this is South Carolina. This is the state constitution that ratified 1778. There is one eternal God and a future state of rewards and punishment. God is publicly to be

0:26:52
worshipped. The Christian religion is the true religion. That the holy scriptures of the Old and New Testaments are divine inspiration and are the rule of faith and practice. And that it is lawful and the duty of every man being there unto called by those that govern to bear witness to that truth. Oh yeah, but we weren't we weren't a Christian nation. Even though it says in the South Carolina state constitution of 1778 that the Christian

0:27:19
religion is the one true religion and that God is to be publicly worshipped. But they didn't want any public worship. Look here's Thomas Jefferson. And the argument that I heard, and I don't want to put this guy on blast anymore, but the argument that I heard from this conservative, who I love, was, oh well that was just one guy. Or Thomas Jefferson wasn't the majority opinion.

0:27:42
Or we as a country didn't go that way. It's like, no, no, no. That's not what Thomas Jefferson meant. Theopsy meant exactly what all these other guys were saying. Let me do one more. Pennsylvania.

0:27:51
So people will often quote this last line. So this last line in this section of the Pennsylvania state constitution says, they were Quaker, of course, and no further or other religious test shall ever hereafter be required of any civil officer or magistrate in the state. So there's Pennsylvania saying no religious tests.

0:28:17
But they leave out the line before it. Section 10 Each representative, before they proceed to business, shall take the following oath. I do believe in one God, the Creator and Governor of the universe, the Rewarder of the good and Punisher of the wicked, and I do acknowledge the scriptures of the Old and New Testament to be given by divine inspiration." You have to make that oath and then no

0:28:42
further or other religious test shall ever be hereafter required. But except for that first one, that the Old and New Testaments are written by the Holy Spirit of divine inspiration. All right so that's enough. Knock it off with the are we a Christian nation or not. We were a million percent founded as one. Nothing could be more obvious. We of course have since lost our way and obviously we're under God's judgment now. There's plenty examples of that. Just go to your nearest college

0:29:16
campus and ask someone what a woman is. They won't even be able to tell you. There's a thousand other examples of how we've lost our way. You can think this is all bad. I wish this weren't the case. We shouldn't be like this anymore. Okay. You can think of those things. But this ridiculous, are we a Christian nation? Of nation. Of course we were and I would argue that the only way back to being a thriving country again is with a revival. Our founding fathers came out of the

0:29:47
Great Awakening, the first Great Awakening in this country. The second Great Awakening led to the end of slavery. We need a third and pronto. So is putting the Ten Commandments in every classroom against the Constitution? No, of course not. Is putting the Ten Commandments in every classroom going to fix all of our problems? No. Pretty good start.

0:30:17
We played the clip of Rosie O'Donnell earlier, talking about her transgender ten-year-old, who told her, said, Mommy, gender is infinite. And Rosie O'Donnell's like, where'd you learn that? And the 10 year old said, I just know it. Where do you think she learned it? She learned it in school.

0:30:34
So pick your religion.

0:30:35
You may wanna do this like,

0:30:37
namsy-pamsy, middle of the road,

like, oh, you know, I'm Christian or whatever, but maybe I don't want religion in the classroom. All right, pick one. There is one. There are religions in the classroom. So pick your religion. Do you want the trans gay pride flag in every classroom? Or do you want the Ten Commandments? Pick one. Which way, Western man? Pick one. Because we took the Ten Commandments


and it wasn't replaced with nothing if we're not a Christian nation what are we don't say nothing gotta be something you better pick one you don't pay his will you don't pay his will payments

 

community logo
Join the MikeSlater Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
0
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
Fox & Friends

We were on Fox & Friends talking about all of the train robberies in CA. It's so bad the train company says they may have to ride right THROUGH Los Angeles entirely and never slow down lol. What a joke this state it.

https://archive.org/details/FOXNEWSW_20220122_110000_FOX_and_Friends_Saturday/start/5640/end/5700

That link is a bit odd, I've attached a short video to get the gist.

In short, The rich get richer, the poor get the handouts and the middle class gets out of town.

This causes these progressive politicians to get even more entrenched.

We haven't hit rock bottom yet.

00:00:32
Boys to men, girls to women

How do you do it? Advice please!

Dean Abbott,
"Why contemporary relations between the sexes are so messed up. The problem starts with men because men lead, the masculine pursues and initiates, and problems always start at the level of leadership.

Most men aren't taught that a relationship with a woman means accepting responsibility. No one tells us that a woman represents not only pleasure, but obligation.
The fact that having a relationship with a woman means responsibility and obligation never enters many men's minds.

When these men enter into a relationship with a woman, they are overwhelmed by her needs, her feminine communication style, and her emotions.
Moreover, he unconsciously resents her for having needs at all since he has been conditioned to see her solely as a source of pleasure.
When her anger and disappointment over his irresponsibility gets intense enough, he splits in search of another woman.
He mistakenly believes the problem wasn't his attitude nor that it is a ...

00:07:55
Surly this will be kicked off twitter eventually
00:06:34
Morning Motivation, April 21, 2023

I found a way to easily transcribe the podcasts, so I will post them here first before they go out to iTunes and the rest.

Good morning. Welcome to The Morning Motivation, brought to you by Public Square and Patriot Gold Group. I'm grateful you're here. I was reading a sermon by the great Puritan preacher John Owen in the mid-1600s. I'm so fascinated by this time period, 1600s, early 1700s. We focus a lot on our founding fathers. I think that the Tea Party movement and just conservatism in general has focused a lot on the founding fathers, and that's amazing, but I'm very fascinated by our founding grandfathers or great-grandfathers, the people who created the culture that our founding fathers were raised in.

0:00:44
Isn't that a fascinating era? We got like 1776, like that's great, I love it, I want to know more, I don't know nearly enough. But what about the 1720s? What was going on there? Or the late 1600s? What was going on in America at that time? And you know, we've all heard of the Puritans, but you ...

Morning Motivation, April 21, 2023
Inflation and ANGER

I am angry and frustrated. With our Rulers. For getting us in this terrible economy. It doesn't have to be this way.

How could they never learn from past mistakes! This is ANCIENT history, stop printing money...yet, after COVID, we never printed more. Amazing.

Please leave a 5-star review on Itunes. We have a ton of momentum, this is about to break through! Thank you!

Also, I haven't done any lives anywhere becauase we're hosting a daily TV show "Road to Misterms" on thefirsttv.com, and it's taken all of my extra time. And my wife is giving birth any day now, so...it's been a lot around here. But after the midterms, time will free up.

Inflation and ANGER
Politics by Faith: Parkland and the Death Penalty

I've gone back and forth on the death penalty many times over the years. I've recently come down on the other side.

Should the Parkland murderer have gotten the death penalty or life in prison?

Please leave a review on iTunes! We need to get to 1k :-)
www.thefirsttv.com/mikeslater

Btw, we're getting the momentum we need, more downloads every day, THANK YOU!

Politics by Faith: Parkland and the Death Penalty
November 26, 2025

Baptized Brethren contest with each other AND against The Church, calling “Lord, Lord” (Mt 7:21-22, 25:11; Lk 6:46), in the Devil’s disunity, whilst the enemy has breached the Gates and is welcomed at and obliged at the most august Court. “Lord, Lord.”

Faith of our Fathers. Jer 6:16; Mal 3:6; Heb 13:7-9; Jam 1:17; Gal 1:6-12; Jude 3; 1 Pet 5:5

THE CODE OF CATHOLIC CHIVALRY

The knight receives as his law the knightly Code of Honor, which is the expression of his absolute fidelity to God:

I. The Knight battles for Christ and His Reign.
II. The Knight serves his Lady the Blessed Virgin Mary.
III. The Knight defends The Holy Church unto blood.
IV. The Knight maintains the Tradition of his Fathers.
V. The Knight fights for Justice, Christian Order and Peace.
VI. The Knight wages war without truce or mercy against the World and its Prince.
VII. The Knight honors and protects the poor, the weak and the needy.
VIII. The Knight despises money and the powers of this world.
IX. The Knight is humble, magnanimous ...

November 19, 2025

You were terse and dismissive in this morning's 7:25 Eastern time call with the Man with four step children applying for Naturalization from his Naturalized U.S. Wife of Philippine descent. You should be more considerate of history about America's relationship such as with the Philippine People, which is quite notable with intrinsic factors which should have favorable weight in consideration the Filipino propensity to immigrate and become American Citizens.

"The Resident Commissioner of the Philippines was a non-voting member of the U.S. House of Representatives from 1907 until the Philippines gained independence in 1946. This role was established under the Philippine Organic Act of 1902, allowing the Philippines to have representation in Congress, similar to current non-voting members from U.S. territories."

Don't be so apparently xenophobic and stop misrepresenting American (and Christian while you're at it) History in omission through culpable ignorance.

The Philippines, 1898–1946
...

post photo preview
November 11, 2025

Happy Veterans' Day.
Support our Troops. Before. During. After.

St. Martin, Bishop of Tours, Confessor, Soldier of the State, Soldier of Christ
November 11
https://www.bartleby.com/lit-hub/lives-of-the-saints/volume-xi-november/st-martin-bishop-of-tours-confessor

post photo preview
JD Vance and The Progressive Pagan Tone Police
Politics By Faith, June 19, 2026

Please subscribe to our youtube page!

I love when pagans criticize Christians for not being "Christian enough" or the right type of Christian that they would prefer. Obviously, don't listen to them, but what does the Bible say about the words we speak and the tone we should have?

Welcome to Politics by Faith. It's where we take the news of the day, we bring it to the Bible. The point of this is we need to walk away with some peace and perspective because there's new headlines every day and it's all very anxiety inducing, but Ecclesiastes says there's nothing new under the sun. So thanks for being here to get the true story. Story of the day, J . D. 

Vance making the rounds and doesn't like his tone. Got a mean tone. Got to watch that tone. The tone police are out. J . D. 

Vance is making the rounds because he's got a new book out. and he is also a great spokesperson for this administration. So where Trump can sometimes be maybe rough around the edges, Vance is smoother, more polished, if you will. I don't know if that's entirely true. I think Trump is pretty smooth and polished, too, in his own way. But maybe the biggest advantage that Trump, excuse me, that Vance has over Trump is he's not Trump. 

So as much as much TDS people have seething through their veins, pulsing constantly through their entire body and soul, they don't yet have the same hatred for J . D. Vance. They will, don't worry. But right now, there's no such thing as J . D . 

D . S. That's right. One day there will be. Aw, he's even worse than Trump because he actually believes what he's saying. That's what's gonna happen. 

But there's certain places where I would much rather have the president be. Like negotiating with Iran, for instance. Trump's great at these big press conferences. Obviously, he's the best at the rallies. But when it comes to one -on -one with adversaries, I choose Vance all day on that one. All day long, you put Vance in that battle. 

big press conferences, Trump with another world leader, you put Trump. Someone versus, you know, meet the press lady or whatever, you send JD on. No question. JD Vance did great with the Ladies in the View, for instance. We played the entire 25 minutes or so he was on on my radio show. My one critique, if I had to have, critique's not even quite right, a nitpick, is the women on The View, they would hit him with like 48 questions at one time, and he'd have to think in his brain, okay, I have 12 seconds to respond. 

How can I possibly combine all of these questions? How am I gonna be able to find a cohesive thread, coherent thread to your incoherent questions, and somehow come up with an answer that can best encompass everything that's been said here? with a 12 second response and a smile. So there's times when he would say, okay, um, let me say this. You can see his brain. I try to put the pieces together. 

That's my one critique. My goodness. He did as good as any human can do in that unenviable situation. But I want to pick out this moment from the New York times podcast. Russ Dothat as this guy's name or an unpronounced or sign. He's very upset that the administration is not nice enough with their tone. 

Here's what he said. We could have a longer argument about the economics, but I just want to let's let's stipulate that the Trump administration has in some way a kind of vision of rebuilding the working class that's connected to Christianity. Was that hard to say? Was that hard to say, Ross? I'm stipulate for the sake of argument. and the fact that you have not given us three hours to have this discussion, we're stipulating it. 

It also seems to me like the administration has distanced itself in different ways from some other sort of obvious expressions of Christian influence on politics, some of them more sort of liberal coded, some of them more conservative coded, right? Like, the administration has been more hostile than any prior Republican administration, to say nothing of Democrats, in the last 20 years to the way we do humanitarian aid. It has kept religious conservatives, pro -life organizations especially, at arm's length in a way that has led to a lot of criticism. And then, you know, let's be honest, the tone of the administration is not consistently a Christian tone. there is a tone of aggressive uncharity to people who aren't on board with the administration's policies. So I would describe those as three areas where the administration has felt functionally post -Christian to me. 

And I'm curious what you think. Well, so on the first point, well, sorry, the third point. You can work backward. So on the tone thing, This is it's it's very hard to rebut this because it's like fundamentally unfalsifiable because for every clip that you could show me of me or the president or some cabinet secretary saying something that in your view is unchristian i could show you another few clips of us doing something or saying something that is like very christian the nature of political communication in the era of mass media is that sometimes people are going to say jokes that are taken out of context sometimes people are going to say I'm not saying I make mistakes. I talk about this in the book a little. 

In my book, Communion, available where books are sold, I talk about the own mistakes that I've made as a Christian reader in America. There is an apology to childless cat ladies. We don't need to get sidetracked by that. Go on. But my point is, I'm not saying we're perfect because we're not. My point is that the tone argument is in some ways, I think, people see what they want to see. 

And I also think that tonal arguments are ways of, frankly, policing working class ways of communication and covering them in elite preferences. So let's talk about what's broken in this scenario here. So yes, the Bible, God, talks about the way we should speak. Proverbs 51, a soft answer. turns away wrath, but a harsh word stirs up anger. " President, we've talked about this before, his game theory approach to talking with people and negotiating, but just everything, he will always start positive. 

He'll start kind every time, always. He will always start with a soft answer and a soft response and a soft initiation, always. 1 Peter 3 .15 says, make a defense to anyone who asks you for a reason for the hope that is in you, yet do it with gentleness and respect. The fruits of the spirit. One of them is kindness. Another is gentleness. 

Also, we are told to speak boldly. Acts 4 .31 says, and when they had prayed, they were all filled with the Holy Spirit and continued to speak the word of God with boldness. " So what do we think boldness, what would boldness mean today? I bet based off of the New York Times editorial board, if they heard a preacher today speak with boldness, they might say, Oh, that tone makes me uncomfortable. That's not very inclusive sound. And we talked about this just the other day. 

The Bible says there is one way to get to heaven. Oh, that's. I don't like your tone. Paul speaks about boldly proclaiming the gospel. First Thessalonians 2 .2. But though we had already suffered, we had been shamefully treated at Philippi. 

As you know, we had boldness in our God to declare you the gospel of God in the midst of much conflict. How were they treated shamefully in Philippi? Or I should say, why? Is it because the people loved so much what they were saying and how they said it? No, that doesn't make any sense. They were treated shamefully, but what does that mean? 

Does that mean, uh, they, they, they preached the gospel boldly. And then people went on Twitter and said, I don't like your tone. No, they were stripped and beaten with rods, all without a trial, of course, then thrown into prison and placed in stocks while bleeding from the beating they just took. And they weren't treated this way because the people of Philippi liked what they were saying. And then all of a sudden, these are two different things. There's what's being said. 

And then there's how it's set. And. Progressive could make the argument, and it's not accurate, but they could make the argument that, oh, they don't mind what the administration's saying, they just don't like how it's set. No, that's you trying to get around. That's just a trick. They don't like what the administration is doing, and they're trying to tone police it as a way to seem like they're morally superior. 

So let's go over the four options though, right? I mean, there's four options. We can make like a chart of these four options. You have bad tone, mean words, good tone, nice words, bad tone, nice words, or good tone, mean words. So maybe this example work, we'll see how it goes. Bad tone, bad words. 

I hate you. Good tone, good word, nice word. Good tone, good, good, good. I love you. Well, let's mix it up. Bad tone, good words. 

I love you. I love you. That's almost like too passionate. How do you do it like hatred? I love you. Good tone, bad words. 

I hate you. The New York Times guy. thinks it's best that we say or do bad things, but in a nice way. That's like the Democrat way. Do bad things, but with a smile. Let's give a political example. 

Maybe this'll make more sense. So the Democrats, they were so nice when they opened up our borders to millions of illegal aliens, many of whom went on to murder and steal and destroy neighborhoods and take jobs and do terrible things. I just saw a story of, it was like 1 ,700 maybe illegal aliens who were arrested in I think like the Houston area. And they went through all their crimes, five murders, 170 burglaries, 78 sex offenses, like 50 against children, 40 domestic abuses, 500 DUIs. Just go down the list. But it was all done with a smile. 

It's so nice. And the poem on the statue says, it's great. The poor, tired, huddled masses. We were so kind when we did this. That's the binary. Bad things, but nicely. 

The Trump administration comes in and says, I actually think they'd said it quite nicely, but they say, you have to go. Oh, that's so mean. Your tone. But that's not even true what I'm saying here, because the real argument is it's the right people. And this is what J . D. 

brought up, right? J . D. after that, where the clip stopped, he said, let me just take a classic example. So the Biden administration had a very humane way of talking about immigration, about illegal immigration. It was very charitable. 

And some of the words that it offered to people who were coming into our country, I would say that it was not particularly charitable to the people who were living with the consequences of mass migration into our country. So at a certain level, what I think matters much more than perceived tone is actual conduct. " Well said, J .D. Vance. There was a similar moment on The View as well. So the questions from a bunch of them at the same time was, the first question from Whoopi was, what did black people do to this administration? that you treat them so terribly." And J . D. was like, what? 

And Whoopi said, she's like, what are you talking about? And they went around the table and they were all like, well, like erasing black history. And he's still like, what are you talking about? But it was all like a tone argument. They were all toned, like the ladies didn't like the tone of this administration or whatever. And J . 

D. says, all right, we've taken over the police department in D . C. , the law enforcement in D . as many murders. Last year, there were Last year, there were 42. 

This year, at the same time period, 20. And that's just murder. I mean, that's like all quality of life crimes are way down. People can go outside. Kids can walk to school. It's a safe city again. 

And it's a predominantly majority Black city. So these are Black people's lives that have improved. So you may not like that we removed a Black history overreach from the Black Lives Matter era. at the Smithsonian. We removed like a sign that was in the Smithsonian about Thomas Jefferson's slaves or something. Is that the most important thing or do you care about actual black lives in DC? 

So that's like, that's a, I think that's like a perfect example of content and tone. So the tone would be, Oh, you're erasing black history. Like, no, they're not. But like, even, but the content is, yeah, but we're saving black people's lives. Don't you care more about what's actually happening? All right, let me go to the Bible. 

So Jesus didn't always have a nice tone. We can't tell the tone really what Jesus was reading, right? But I can't imagine him having a great tone when in Matthew 23, Jesus says to the Pharisees, woe to you, hypocrites, for you shut the kingdom of heaven in people's faces, for you neither enter yourselves nor allow those who would enter to go in. I don't think he said that like politely or something. There's seven of those, by the way. Woes to you. 

Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites. For you are like whitewashed tombs, which outwardly appear beautiful, but within are full of dead people. bones and all uncleanliness. So you also outwardly appear righteous to others, but within you, you're full of hypocrisy and lawlessness. I don't think the people around were like, Oh, he's got such a nice tone. Listen to his tone. 

Wow. Or John 8 44, you are of your father, the devil, and your will is to do your father's desires. He was a murderer from the beginning. and does not stand in the truth because there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks out of his own character, for he is a liar and the father of lies. That's not very nice, Jesus. 

Revelation 2 .20, speaking about Jezebel. Behold, I will throw her onto a sickbed and those who commit adultery with her. I will throw into great tribulation unless they repent of her works. And I will strike her children dead. And all the churches will know that I am he who searched mind and heart. And I will give to each of you according to your works. 

Yikes. What is, what is Ross Dothat from the New York times? Think about that. Paul said in Galatians 1a, but even if we or an angel from heaven should preach to you a gospel contrary to the one we preach to you, let him be accursed. As we've said before. So now I say again, if anyone is preaching to you a gospel contrary to the one you receive, let him be accursed. 

The accursed in Greek is anathema. And the definition is devoted to the direst of woes. It's not very lovely sounding. Paul in Galatians 1a. Eric called the Galatians foolish. He calls people liar. 

He calls false preachers ungodly, wretched wanderers. Micah said that people hate good and love evil. That sounds judgmental. I think we need more of a strong tone from Christians. And I don't really care if Ross Dothat or whoever at the New York Times, they don't like it. We need strong tones when confronting hypocrisy, when guarding the truth, when protecting the church, when warning of judgment, and every time love requires it. 

True words and a strong tone is not bigoted. The truth demands nothing less. youtube . com slash at politics by faith. If you're listening to this on podcast, thank you. You can watch it as well on our YouTube channel, youtube . com. So if you could please subscribe, we've got youtube . com slash at politics by faith.

 

Read full Article
"One Of The Most Horrendous Failures In The History Of The Country"
Politics By Faith, June 17, 2026

The Rape Gang Inquiry report was released in England. It's more horrendous than anyone could imagine. They believe over 250,000 white British girls were trafficked in England. These crimes were committed by Muslim men, again, IN England. Every story they told of how this happened followed the same 3-step outline.

Welcome to Politics by Faith. This is where we take the news of the day and bring it to the Bible so we can walk away with peace and perspective. There's new headlines every day. What Ecclesiastes says is not the new under the sun. So thanks for being here to get the true story. And if you're listening to this on podcast, you can watch it on YouTube, youtube . 

com slash at politics by faith. Kids warning for the story of today, of the day to day. No kids allowed during this episode. If you do listen to the show with your kids, that means the world to me. I really want this to be a place that is wholesome and pure and something you can trust kids at least to be around. This episode is not that episode. So this is your official kids warning for today's episode. 

Give me a second to change the podcast away from this one. Story of the day today. Rape or gang rape inquiry report. Here's what happened. It's a British Congressman, essentially they're called member of parliament, Rupert Lowe. He's the lead of this effort. 

And they released a 219 page report outlining the horrors and scale of mostly Pakistani Muslims trafficking white British girls. The rape gang inquiry looked at the systemic targeting of overwhelmingly white British girls across the United Kingdom. The report says that the evidence put to the inquiry The evidence put to the inquiry confirms that this scandal constitutes one of the most horrendous failures in the history of the country. The scale of the crimes committed is staggering. Check this out. It has been previously established that at the very least, how many young girls do you think were trafficked inside of England? 

Like British girls trafficked within England? How many girls? What if I said 10 ,000? That'd be crazy. 250 ,000 young white girls have been subjected to repeated rape, gang rape, trafficking, torture, pregnancy, forced Islamic conversion, and obviously lifelong trauma. The report says the number, the actual number is probably higher. 

87 % of people convicted in these child sex exploitation cases had distinctively Muslim names. And those are just the ones convicted. Of the accused, it's 99 % Muslim. The report is tough to read. What's encouraging about it, if anything, is that this is the first time I've ever heard people not afraid to name the enemy. In this case, it's Muslim men, mostly Pakistani, but other cultural identities as well. 

All Muslim. The report says that the pattern was reinforced by eight theological and legal aspects of Islam. Talk about naming the enemy. These include the doctrine of Muslim superiority, drawn from Qur 'anic verses and the report goes through all the different verses of the Qur 'an. The gang members justification for their crimes can be found in the Islamic principles of loyalty and disavowal, the superiority of men over women, forced marriage combined with the absence of any fixed minimum age of consent, also the perception that a family sexuality is inherently dangerous. 

A system of sex slavery that authorizes sexual relations with non -Muslim captives. Also a religious sanctioned social hierarchy that subjugates conquered non -Muslims. Or in this case, British girls while in England. You take these Islamic aspects and you filter it through a clannish immigrant subculture The report says it provides religious justification that enabled the systemic rape and slaughter of white British girls. My goodness. So what's broken in this report? 

A lot, but I'll tell you what some, some initial thoughts I had after reading it. All of the stories they shared had the same outline as a three -step outline. First, the girls were the victims of abuse, neglect, and trauma at home. White British girls, abuse, neglect, and trauma at home. Second. Muslim gangs were ready to pounce. 

And three, the absolute failure of police, hospitals, all British institutions to do anything because they were scared that they would be called racist. It's the same outline, every story that they talk about. I'll give one example. Again, I encourage you to read the whole report. It's really tough, but it's really important to know what's happening. And it's important to know the full scale of this. 

I'm going to choose to go over just Chloe as the study here. It's not the worst story that they share. It's not the most brutal. It's the first one they share. So I'll just share Chloe just to get the outline out there. Chloe's parents divorced when she was young. 

She and her brother were in the custody of dad, which means her mom had major problems. Turns out she was homeless, but he was an alcoholic. Now she said life was generally secure with her dad, though, all things considered. But then dad died when she was 10. So then she went to go live with her mom and mom's new husband, who was also a pedophile, who, of course, abused her. Mom even caught the husband abusing her multiple times and did nothing, which might be the worst betrayal imaginable. 

One time this step dad or whatever was in the shower with her and mom walked in and then walked right out and she was 10 years old. This stepdad gave her alcohol and drugs to keep her quiet. She, of course, started running away, hanging out late at night with terrible people, unsupervised. So there's step one. And step two, that's where the Muslim men preyed on her and took her in, wooing her, treating her like an adult, whatever, all the grooming stuff. They filled that void that her own degenerate parents and people around her left. 

Her aunt and uncle were the only adults that she could confide in. And one time she went to them for help and her uncle raped her. So she's done. She's done. And she goes and she lives with all these Muslim men. She's 11 and she has passed around Pakistani men all through town and, and traffic through the taxi drivers in the city who were all Pakistani. 

So you see the two opening failures here. You have her parents and the adults around her, just total failure in every imaginable way. Then number two, there were the Pakistani Muslim men waiting to hunt her down. And then she had no help from the police or from the hospitals. And that's the third failure. The report says that around the age of 13, Chloe disclosed 

to social services that she was being sexually abused by gangs of Muslim men. In response, social services did not intervene, but rather talk to Chloe about contraception and sexual health. One social worker started regularly taking Chloe to a sexual health clinic where she was diagnosed with chlamydia in her throat, gonorrhea, genital warts, pelvic inflammatory disease, all the rest. At one point, a Pakistani man put a whiskey bottle up inside of her and then broke the bottle. And she went to the ER and the hospital did nothing to ask her, how did this happen? The hospital did nothing to ask her, how can we help you? 

How can we remove you from this obviously horrible situation you're in? They did nothing. When she was interviewed for this report, she was asked how many men abused her in this period of her life from the ages of 10 to 18. She said hundreds, hundreds and hundreds and hundreds. It's just one story. There's many, but again, the same outline every time. 

Broken home, then Pakistani Muslims. wading in the wings, and then the failure of the politically correct system to save any of these girls. I would argue that failure number one comes from a lack of Christianity and a lack of Christian culture. Of course, everyone sins and everyone makes mistakes, but the level of abandonment that these girls faced, then the taking advantage of that brokenness is where the Muslims came in and that's Islam. And again, they talked about eight parts of Islam in this report, naming the enemy. It's great. 

Muslim supremacy. Number two, an us versus them mindset. 3. Superiority and dominance of men over women. 4. The seclusion of women. 5. Forced marriage and no age of consent. 

Number six, female sexuality. Number seven, jihad and sex slavery. And number eight is an Islamic clan culture. And the report goes through each of those and quotes the Quran. We don't need to do it here, but again, I recommend that you read the full report just to know that we need to be reminded that this evil exists in the world. And it's not just in England or Pakistan. 

It's in our backyard in America as well. You just search for rape gang inquiry and it'll pop up. So let's bring the Bible in here. First, we're supposed to take care of widows and orphans. Instead, we become such a degenerate people that we make orphans, not just because parents die in a tragic accident, but because they're totally alcoholic, drugged up, whatever. We're making orphans. 

And then the state abandons them and the Muslims take them in as sex slaves in our own countries. Listen, when Job is talking about all the wicked things that God is allowing in this fallen world, he's venting. One of them, it's in verse, uh, sorry, chapter 24. Uh, and he just goes through this list of all these things like, God, like, how can you allow this? And in verse nine, he said, there are those who snatch the fatherless child from the breast and they take a pledge against the poor. What is that? 

This is back then when people who would take babies. So babies without fathers, but maybe the woman was in debt and they would take the baby as debt collateral as a young infant. And then do what with the baby? Who even knows? But the point is that Joe put this right in there, the list of extreme depravity. And Joe's upset that this goes on and goes unpunished. 

And it's going on today in the Western world too, if not worse. I'm recording this day on Pride Month. We're halfway through Pride Month. 1 Thessalonians 4 .3 says, it is God's will that you should be sanctified, that you should abstain from sexual immorality. There is so much sexual immorality. In phase one of this, where the parents fail, and then phase two, where the Muslim gangs take over, my goodness, it is the worst of sexual immorality, sexual depravity. 

Think, it's hard to say, right? But I think the worst would be pedophilia. Which leads me to Matthew 18 .6, if anyone causes one of these little ones, those who believe in me to stumble, it would be better for them to have a large millstone hung around their neck and be drowned in the depths of the sea. So if you think that sounds bad, if you think having a millstone tied around your neck and dropped overboard, if you think that sounds bad, you would prefer that than what you're gonna get. These people who are putting these young kids in a situation that is horrific, causing them to be in these places where sin is everywhere. Everyone involved in this failure, has put these children in these horrific situations, and a millstone should be placed around their necks, or they would prefer it than what's coming next in life or afterlife. 

They may get away with it here, but they won't in the end. A millstone, to be clear, was a giant stone with a rope through it, and the rope would be tied to a donkey, and the donkey would walk in a circle, and it would grind the grain. And these millstones would weigh hundreds of pounds. And apparently in Rome, they did this as a form of execution. They would tie this heavy rock like this and throw you overboard. And the Jews thought this was barbaric and awful. 

And here was Jesus. coming in saying, what's coming for you is even worse than that. In In a just society, we would do everything we could to stop this immediately. We'll see how the British people react. We'll see if political correctness, truly political correctness, we'll see if political correctness wins the day. And then we'll see if we decide to root this out in America as well. 

You want to talk about an 80 -20 issue in America that every political party, every political, everyone could get behind? You would think would be getting rid of this. But with so many oppressed peoples involved, Muslims, migrants, foreigners, I don't know if we will. Stay tuned on this one. YouTube . com slash at politics by faith. 

If you subscribe to our YouTube page, you're great. YouTube . com slash at politics by faith by the word.

Read full Article
Fight Night, Fighting Presidents and Fighting Prayer
Politics By Faith, June 15, 2026

The president hosted an incredible event in the White House. If you had the microphone for 30 seconds to talk to over 100 million people, what would you say?


Welcome to Politics by Faith. This is where we take the news of the day, we bring it to the Bible, so we can walk away with peace and perspective. There's new headlines every day and can all be very overwhelming, cause a lot of anxiety, but Ecclesiastes says there's nothing new under the sun. So thanks for being here to get the true story, story of the day, UFC fight night at the White House. Here's what happened. I didn't catch it live, but I've seen tons of clips of the pageantry of it all. 

Unbelievable. I, I, I've heard people use the word surreal to describe it. Just incredible. Let's just look at the production value alone. It wasn't just at the White House, which is what I was expecting. It was in the White House. 

It was totally immersive within the White House in every way. The main fight, the American guy, Gaethje, it started with him in the Oval Office looking at the Declaration of Independence up on the wall. And then he has this flag draped around his back and he walks out through the White House down the stairs into the Octagon. Oh, and then, by the way, beats the foreign undefeated champion for the America 250. The whole thing is ridiculous. And then he was asked at the end, he said, I mean, you were six to one odds. 

And he said, oh, man, the odds that our founding fathers faced were even worse and they still won. And here we are today in the greatest country in the world. What is happening is ridiculous. There was a scene of the opening national anthem sung by Zac Brown. He's in the octagon. Behind him is the Marine Corps marching band. 

Then the White House with the Blue Angels and the Thunderbirds flying over the White House all the same time. It looked AI, but it was very, very real. Just incredible optics. And I want to encourage the Freedom 250 people. Don't get me started on this. It's two different groups. 

America 250 was started 10 years ago by Congress. Biden appointed this woman, Rosie Rios, who is Mexican. She says, I'm Mexican more than American, and Mexicans in my blood, and California used to be part of Mexico. She's said all this stuff in Mexico before, so she doesn't love this country. She is sabotaging it. That's my unfounded claim, but look at the fruit. 

She is sabotaging the America 250. So when Trump won a year and a half ago, he came in, looked around and said, you guys got nothing planned, so he started a group called Freedom 250. has decided to lean on like UFC. They're doing the state fair coming up here where there's gonna be a big rodeo. They're doing the motocross. This is great. 

Big red state things that we are good at that the country loves. I haven't confirmed this, but I heard maybe 130 million people watched the UFC fight at the White House. 19 million watched the NBA finals. Like, what are we talking about here? Like lean into this stuff that works. You combine this incredible moment in the sports culture realm with the soccer win and just all the Europeans and people around the world in America loving America while they're here for the World Cup. 

Also a caller called in and a listener called in and told us about this golfer, this American golfer in Canada who's playing on this course. And I guess they have something called a rink hole where it's set up. They have like hockey boards, like the wall and a hockey rink. They have hockey boards all around it. So they call it the rink hole. So this American put on Someone in the audience had a Jack Hughes jersey. 

Jack Hughes was the American who got the game -winning goal in overtime to win the gold medal in the hockey game at the Olympics. So this golfer put on a Jack Hughes jersey in Canada, just want to remind you that, in Canada, and birdied the par 3. to resounding boos. As soon as he hit it, everyone started booing because it was a great shot, because he's in Canada. It's just been fun. Today's show was fun when we talked about all this stuff. 

It feels very golden era -y. A lot of fun, optics, fun moments in our life. There's a lot to say here about patriotism and the political winning that this is as well. Just a very quick point on that. The left, really since like the 60s, but certainly in the last six years, have really set themselves up as the people, the party, that don't like this country. We're defined by our sins. 

We have to apologize for them forever around the world and here at home. We have to teach our kids about how terrible we are. We were founded in 1690 because of slavery. America's evil and bad and awesome. And then Trump, you know, this last year, with so many amazing things that have happened, like going around the moon. We'll throw that in the mix too. 

There's been like really cool moments here. And because of the left's TDS, they've had to kind of be against it. There was an article in Salon about the World Cup. And the headline was something like, are Americans with as terrible as we've been? And are we allowed to be happy during the World Cup? Or are we allowed to root for America? 

It's like, what are you talking about? But they've humiliated, they've leaned so far into hating this country. And now that we are leaning so far into loving it, obscenely loving it, like to an extreme, that the left has humiliated themselves politically. And I think this is a great thing politically. Real quick, some people have said that having UFC is beneath the White House or something like that. Well, first of all, I mean, put it next to what Biden did to the White House with all the pride. 

stuff and the columns in front of the White House all in rainbow colors and topless transgender people. I mean, give me a break. So there's that. But I don't even think this is degrading the White House. Teddy Roosevelt had boxing matches in the White House. He boxed in them. 

He got punched in the face. He went partially blind in his left eye. He was boxing against some military aide of his who punched him right in the face. And then he decided, I don't know if I should be boxing anymore at the White House. It's not a great look for the president to have a black eye. Now, Teddy Roosevelt was kind of a different breed of man. 

That was a while ago, too. But even Lincoln, you know, they had the weigh -in at the Lincoln Memorial. And Lincoln, well, Lincoln's in the Wrestling Hall of Fame, not the WWE. like Greco -Roman wrestling hall of fame. He grew up in the frontier. Legend has it, he fought in 300 wrestling matches. 

And they called this rough and tumble wrestling, no holds barred, you do whatever, you gouge out eyes, hit below the belt, whatever. He was 6 '4", and Lincoln's huge. And the story is, and I'm sticking with it, that his record's 301. He lost one time to all Hank Thompson during the Blackhawk War in Illinois. He also was in a duel. Lincoln was the captain of his militia company and Lincoln was challenged to a duel. 

He was debating someone. I don't know what he said. I don't know if anyone knows what he said, but I don't know what he said. And the guy challenged him to a duel. And dueling, it was illegal in Illinois. So they had to go to this island in the Mississippi River. 

It's like a lawless island where people would go to have duels. So they met. And because Lincoln was challenged, he got to pick his weapon of choice. He chose the sword. So the men on the island, and I think the guy saw Lincoln enormous with a huge sword and he called a truce and he never spoke of it. The famous line is. 

a man asked him about it and asked if it was true that you were in a duel. And Lincoln said, I do not deny it, but if you desire my friendship, you will never mention it again. I share that because fighting at the White House isn't unprecedented and it's not bad to like fighting. in a sported context like this. And Trump, of course, has been a boxing fan with Atlantic City for many, many decades. All right, here's why I wanted to bring UFC up during our Politics by Faith episode here. 

My producer and I were talking, in my experience growing up, this is before I was a Christian, I would see these athletes thank God, like when they won the Super Bowl or something, and I would mock that and say like, oh, how ridiculous, like God cares about who won the Super Bowl. And if he helped you win the Super Bowl, what does that mean? God's not a Buffalo Bills fan or whatever. Like God hates the Bills and made them lose the Super Bowl. What about the players on the Bills who were praying to win at the Super Bowl? I just thought it was really silly to bring up God in scenarios like this. 

I feel differently now. I think you should bring up God all the time, win or lose. Philippians 4, 6 says, do not be anxious about anything, but in everything, By prayer and supplication, with Thanksgiving, let your requests be made known to God. But not if it's about a sporting event that you're participating in. No, like all of them. Let them all know. 

Let them all be made known to God. And if you don't get what you want, then no worries. It wasn't God's plan. That's why we played that clip of the Spencer Pratt from the Spencer Pratt campaign. It was one interview. I think it was in Fox. 

And he said, it's all God's plan. And if I win, then that's great. That's God's plan. If not, then that's great too. I get to go home and be with the kids more. I mean, Jesus says it quite explicitly. 

Mark 11, 24 says, therefore, I tell you, whatever you ask in prayer, believe that you received it and it will be yours. John 15, 7 says, if you abide in me and my words abide in you, ask whatever you wish and it will be done for you. Matthew 21, 22, whatever you ask in prayer, you will receive if you believe. Now, of course, God's not a genie. Doesn't mean like you wish for it and you get 10 wishes a year, 10 prayers a year that won't guaranteed come true. Like that's not how that works. 

But the Bible is very clear. You should make your requests known to God. Now, more than the outcome, it's about the process and it's about trusting him throughout whatever happens. Check out this fighter after one of the matches here. For everything, Donald White, Hunter, congratulations. It's a spectacular event. 

Thank you so much. I'm so happy. And I have a message. In John 3, verse 16, it says, For God so loved the world, that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish, but have eternal life. Jesus changed my life. Jesus saved my life. 

Jesus wants to save your life too. Give your life to Jesus. Thank you so much. In case we're not allowed to play that on YouTube, he said, John 3 .16. For God so loved the world, he gave his one and only son, so that you may not perish, but have eternal life. He said, God, or he said, Jesus has changed my life. 

He saved my life. You should make Jesus Lord of your life as well. So here's this man using his platform at this moment with 130 million people watching, whatever, to praise God and to worship God. That's awesome. And it's encouraging for people. I remember when I was just, I was like, 

the Bible. So I wasn't yet, uh, I wasn't yet baptized and I was driving down the street and, uh, this guy who I liked on the radio was on, he was mocking God and mocking religion. And I was still in this process of, of reading the Bible whenever. And I was like, yeah, maybe this is all pretty silly. This guy has a point. This is just kind of dumb. 

What if it is just all imaginary? Right. And send me down. Not a great place. And I think a lot of Chris, so they're vocal. The pagans are vocal. 

A lot of Christians are quiet, silent. Just kind of keep it to themselves. It's like, oh no, you should talk about it. Make it normal. Make it normal to talk about. Make it known. 

Because there's a lot of people who are studying the Bible right now or asking questions and thinking about it. And just you, just a little bit of encouragement here and there, a little bit like, oh, like this isn't weird, can do a lot of good. So get up there wherever, if you've got 130 million people watching you at a moment or one, get up there and worship God. We should be thanking God for the ability to do whatever we're doing. So it's not that you won the Superbowl. It's that you can play football or is that you can run or that you have a heart that beats. 

Anything good that happens is a blessing from God. A Christian at a UFC, and maybe he could give the same message if he lost. And that's a good test. If it's a good message, is what you're saying divorced from earthly outcome? Could you, could he have said the same thing if he won or lost? Yep. 

Let's go to the Bible, Matthew 7, 7, ask, and it will be given to you. Seek, and you will find. Knock, and it will be opened to you. For everyone who asks, receives. And the one who seeks, finds. And to the one who knocks, it will be opened. 

" Pretty amazing. Martin Lloyd -Jones, he said, I cannot imagine a better, more cheering or a more comforting state of mind. which to face all the uncertainties and hazards of our life in this world than the ones contained right here. There's nothing that could be more encouraging as we face life with all of its uncertainties and possibilities. Our future is unknown. In such a situation, this is the essence of the biblical message from beginning to end. 

This is the promise that comes to us. Ask and it will be given. Seek and you'll find. NACA will be open to you. In order that we might be quite certain about it, our Lord repeats it and puts it in an even stronger form. He says, for everyone that asks receives, and he that seeks finds, and to him that knocks, it shall be open. 

There's no doubt about it. It is certain. It is an absolute promise. What is more, it's a promise made by the Son of God Himself, speaking with all the fullness and authority of His Father. Again, God is not a genie. Thank God for that. 

He knows what's best for us. We can look back on life, especially things we wanted, things we prayed for that God didn't give us right away or at all. And we look back and we're like, Oh my goodness. Thank you God for not answering that prayer. Our job is to pray and whatever happens, worship him. Win, lose, high, low, young, old, happy, depressed, always be praising God because he's our father. 

He's our father in heaven. Quick preview. We're going to be doing a father's day TV special coming up in just a couple of days here. But what that means, what is a heavenly father? youtube . com slash at politics by faith. 

Thanks for listening to this wherever you're listening to it. You can watch as well on our YouTube page, youtube . com slash at politics by faith.

 

Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals